Crypto_is_freedom

🔺 The potential downside of this proposal * Short economic focus. It incentivises stakers to make short term economic decisions, preferring working or soon-to-be-working subnets over subnets that are still building. As truly innovative AI models take time to develop, you may wonder if these projects will receive the funds necessary to deliver their product(s). 
* In line with this: it incentivises creating ‘easy products’ over groundbreaking/complex products. Bittensor is the sum of the quality of its subnets. Therefore, will it be the sum of easy products or of groundbreaking AI products? This is a crucial question as it will determine if it will deliver its mission. * If stakers (i.e. whales) don’t have a minimum APY they can count on, they may lose interest in the project, leading to more fluctuations and a lower value of $TAO

 🔺 Thoughts to improve this proposal (@opentensor) 
* Creating a minimum funding delegation for each subnet, enough to progress but too little to become a fat goose. 
* Create a minimum staking APY range (generic spread over the 32 subnets?) for those that don’t want to change their delegations every now and then. As this will retain and attract whales. 
* Make a calendar to share all subnet milestones to boost their transparency and visibility 
* Create a (public or community driven) selection round for new project teams wanting to enter a future vacant subnet, to boost their visibility and select groundbreaking AI projects. In short, I’m a great proponent of this proposal. In my view it will be a necessary alteration to ramp up Bittensor!