
Creator of @jquery, Chief Software Architect at @khanacademy, Creator of https://xitter.cf/t.co/UcOO6CdK7c
- Tweets10.4K
- Following2.5K
- Followers233K
- Likes25.6K

ALT A view showing a Japanese print of kabuki actors. The print itself is annotated with boxes around faces, title, signatures, and the print itself. Next to it are classifications confirming that this is, in fact, a print, we're seeing the front of it, it's one sheet, it's unmounted, vertical, rectangular, very likely to be a Japanese print, and depicts kabuki actors show are playing famous warriors from history.

ALT Scatter chart titled "Comparing text extraction with gpt-6 and 5.6 luna." It plots the average of accuracy and completeness (0–10), graded by Claude Opus 5 on 47 Japanese print listings, against cost per 1,000 listings on a log scale. gpt-6-luna scores 8.1 at $0.20 with the original prompt and 8.3 at $0.24 with a tuned prompt, joined by a dashed line. gpt-5.6-luna scores 8.5 at $0.51 originally and 8.4 at $0.57 tuned. Both Luna models ran on OpenAI's flex tier. Other models: gemini-3.5-flash-lite 8.1 at $1.39, gemini-2.5-flash-lite 7.7 at $0.34, glm-5.3-flash 5.8 at $0.72, mimo-v2.6-flash 5.7 at $1.53, deepseek-v4.1-flash 5.5 at $2.79, and minimax-m3 4.5 at $0.73. The tuned gpt-6-luna nearly matches gpt-5.6-luna at under half the cost.

ALT Table titled "Luna vs. Jev: Japanese Print Metadata Extraction" comparing GPT-5.6 Luna with Jev on three decisions. Which artist is this? Luna: 6 wrong, $0.29 per 1k, 1.1 s. Jev: 2 wrong, $0.04 per 1k, 0.28 s. Is this translation actually Japanese? Luna: 0 of 60 Chinese or untranslated answers caught. Jev: 60 of 60 caught. Medium and format of the object: Luna 8 wrong of 124. Jev 0 wrong, abstains on 14.











