The guy with the mouth (@othergames) header
The guy with the mouth (@othergames) profile picture
Joined May 2009
Photo by The guy with the mouth (@othergames)Photo by The guy with the mouth (@othergames)Photo by The guy with the mouth (@othergames)Photo by The guy with the mouth (@othergames)Photo by The guy with the mouth (@othergames)Photo by The guy with the mouth (@othergames)Photo by The guy with the mouth (@othergames)Photo by The guy with the mouth (@othergames)
Anti-vaxxers in the hospital sure do owe a lot to Obamacare. You can bet insurance would have treated “refuses to protect themselves with one safe vaccination” as a pre-existing condition.
1
How was your day?
I will be attending President Trump’s Second Inauguration on January 20, 2021. Will you be there?
1
1
The guy with the mouth retweeted
25
109
16
476
#FuckTrump #MerryChrismas @realDonaldTrump May this the first of many Christmases spent alone. Next one #Impeachment and the next #inprison
1
The guy with the mouth retweeted
On this Christmas Eve, we’d like to acknowledge our partners at @LAPDHQ who have been working with us to protect Christmas since Hans Gruber’s 1988 attack on Nakatomi Plaza. #DetectiveJohnMclean #YesItsAChristmasMovie
487
9,176
1,260
25,228
The guy with the mouth retweeted
Replying to @ForAmerica @nbc @Macys
I know that what children see here is love...what breaks their innocence is seeing hate from their elders
1
4
105
The guy with the mouth retweeted
As my grandmother used to say — a hit dog will holler.
4,703
35,787
12,761
120,361
The guy with the mouth retweeted
The president is an unindicted co-conspirator in federal crimes and he has nominated someone to the Supreme Court who believes a sitting president should never be indicted. Retweet if you agree that Kavanaugh’s hearings should be delayed until these investigations are completed.
4,555
56,142
2,353
57,194
The guy with the mouth retweeted
In 100 briefings, Sarah Sanders has punted to Trump's personal lawyers at least 41 times. Obama's press secretaries did it zero times. Because Obama wasn't a criminal.
133
1,116
65
3,754
The guy with the mouth retweeted
"I think it's time to recognize that what we are watching in the Trump presidency is worse than Watergate," says Carl Bernstein cnn.it/2AALHxz
392
1,885
287
4,841
The guy with the mouth retweeted
Was Merrick Garland judged on his views, character, and opinions?
After meeting Judge Kavanaugh and reviewing his record, I have decided to support his nomination. No one will ever completely agree with a nominee (unless of course, you are the nominee). Each nominee however, must be judged on the totality of their views character and opinions.
188
3,227
137
12,177
The guy with the mouth retweeted
Just a reminder that someone stole George W. Bush's debate prep book (and videotapes!) and sent it to the Gore campaign and they immediately turned all the materials over to the FBI
477
15,893
718
60,773
The guy with the mouth retweeted
Don’t retweet this video I found where Trump says he has RUSSIAN BUSINESS PARTNERS. Could mess up his golf swing. Trump literally says “One of the great families in Russia is our partner.” He’s talking about Putin’s oligarch who set up Trump Tower meeting.
241
7,231
628
6,708
The guy with the mouth retweeted
Impeach.
1,714
14,149
848
79,684
It's important to remember they've never cared. They don't care now and they didn't care 20 years ago. All that matters is power, and the ends justify the means for them. teapaw.org/drvox/status/101638095…
What a sack of garbage this loser is. teapaw.org/cnnpolitics/status/101…
President Trump calls journalists "bad people" at a rally a week after a deadly newsroom shooting cnn.it/2KH17Fe
The guy with the mouth retweeted
'pore over' 🔍"to read or study very carefully" 'pour over' ☕️"to make expensive coffee" 'comb over' 💇‍♂️"to comb hair from the side of the head to cover the bald spot" merriam-webster.com/dictiona…
1,814
19,418
6,244
65,100
The guy with the mouth retweeted
FACT CHECK: the sources exist teapaw.org/realdonaldtrump/status…
The Washington Post is constantly quoting “anonymous sources” that do not exist. Rarely do they use the name of anyone because there is no one to give them the kind of negative quote that they are looking for. They are a disgrace to journalism but then again, so are many others!
45
148
11
622