Steven Strogatz (@stevenstrogatz) header
Steven Strogatz (@stevenstrogatz) profile picture

Mathematician, writer, Cornell professor. All cards on the table, face up, all the time.

Ithaca, NY
Joined May 2012
A free sample of BIG MATH (my new book with Alex Townsend) is now up on Amazon. Hope you like it! read.amazon.com/sample/03165…
15
31
287
28,701
Steven Strogatz retweeted
What will you discuss with family and friends over Thanksgiving? How about the pros and cons of IQ, RQ, and EQ? Order now and you'll be prepared to converse about it over the break.
🤖 Made with AI
14
22
4
265
20,352
Steven Strogatz retweeted
On this week’s The Joy of Why podcast, astrophysicist Shep Doeleman tells the inside story behind the first-ever image of a black hole — and why it was one around 55 million light years away rather than the one at the center of our own galaxy. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
1
7
31
7,063
How Do You Take a Picture of a Black Hole? Astrophysicist Shep Doeleman explains how capturing the first image of a black hole required a telescope the size of the world, and why the next goal is to create a movie. quantamagazine.org/how-do-yo…
3
12
1
64
5,404
This article in @Forbes -- by a radiologist with a mathematical background -- is really good. The curious example of fingernail "clubbing" as a correlate of more serious disease is super-interesting too. Thanks for sharing your expertise, Dr @PaulHsieh.
1
15
118
11,530
Steven Strogatz retweeted
"Early career researcher responses to AI in math" (by Anna Brandenberger, Hanna Mularczyk, Dora Woodruff): arxiv.org/abs/2610.40584 Abstract: "(…) However, the personal stakes are highest for early career researchers. (…)"
5
32
6
165
32,302
Steven Strogatz retweeted
Human understanding has brought us progress. That does not mean progress will always need human understanding. @stevenstrogatz presses this uncomfortable point in his conversation with @3blue1brown's Grant Sanderson. They imagine AI that does the whole of mathematics better: solving problems, asking questions, building theories and explaining the results. Lawyers should take the same thought experiment seriously. Suppose AI could also weigh competing interests more wisely and give better legal advice. The claim that human understanding produces better decisions would no longer be enough to defend it. But law binds people. A better answer does not, by itself, confer authority over them. Predicting my consent is not obtaining it. Understanding has a further purpose here: it allows people to examine the terms under which they live together and challenge the reasons offered for them. That opportunity should survive even when their objections do not improve the answer. The practical question is whether our institutions will make room for that participation. Giving people an explanation is only half the work. Their reasons must be heard too. Watch the video: youtube.com/watch?v=xUSznTR2… And my brief essay on the subject: jonashertner.com/writing/wha…
3
10
2,865
Steven Strogatz retweeted
Replying to @stevenstrogatz
@stevenstrogatz on rizz being in demand. Incidentally, if I had to sum up why talking with him is so consistently delightful in one word, rizz is not a bad choice!
In my recent conversation with Grant Sanderson on his podcast, I mentioned the value of "rizz" for aspiring mathematicians. Grant laughed at that and then Business Insider asked about it (businessinsider.com/cornell-…) so I'd like to say more about what I meant.
7
30
5
400
31,957
Steven Strogatz retweeted
3. Y finalmente, porque me pareció una gran oportunidad para experimentar mecanismos de evaluación en matemática en la era de IA. Les comparto la propuesta con los lineamientos de evaluación por si quieren chusmear y comentar! github.com/pgroisma/investig…
1
1
11
1,944
Steven Strogatz retweeted
Mañana es la gran final del Investigathon organizado por @somos_yhat. Desde nuestro grupo de investigación propusimos un tema para uno de los tracks. Estoy muy contento de que seamos parte de este evento por varias razones. 🧵
1
1
22
3,476
Steven Strogatz retweeted
Very honored to be featured in Scientific American. Thank you @KenOno691 @axiommathai for joining my journey to my holy grail and @lyndie_chiou for the great story!
2
7
2
28
6,835
Steven Strogatz retweeted
I had a great time talking to @nxthompson about my book The God Test on his podcast The Most Interesting Thing in AI. (To answer the obvious question: Yes, this does mean that my book on AI is the most interesting thing in AI.)
5
18
3,774
Steven Strogatz retweeted
😍
4
3
44
3,703
In my recent conversation with Grant Sanderson on his podcast, I mentioned the value of "rizz" for aspiring mathematicians. Grant laughed at that and then Business Insider asked about it (businessinsider.com/cornell-…) so I'd like to say more about what I meant.
7
24
3
212
45,601
I’m 67 years old. And maybe I’m using the concept of “rizz” incorrectly. I’ve heard my 24- and 26-year-old daughters use it, and I assumed it meant a kind of generalized charisma. What I was trying to say is that in the age of AI, mathematicians may need to lean into their unique human qualities -- their taste, their ability to make connections between different subjects or different parts of math, to find new applications, to persuade others that what they’re looking at is interesting. But I also mean something more personal. All the things you’ve gone through in your life, what you’ve sensed with your body, what you’ve felt emotionally -- what people nowadays call “lived experience” (a phrase I’m not fond of) -- combine to make you uniquely you. And that’s all part of your charisma. So are your speaking ability, your writing flair, even your grammatical mistakes, quirks, and idiosyncrasies. All those things that give a human touch may be in greater demand than ever. They’re all part of what I mean by “rizz.” And I mean all this in a purely intellectual sense, not a romantic one! I suspect this kind of "rizz" may become a more important quality for mathematicians than ever before, now that AI has become a great equalizer in technical problem-solving power.
12
17
2
148
9,448
To hear the discussion in context, start listening at around 4:00 (for AI as the great equalizer) up to around 8:20 (when we finish talking about mathematical "rizz"). youtu.be/xUSznTR2cwc
7
22
4,198