
Mathematician • High School #Math Teacher • #HumanizeMath • #ADHD • Thought follower • Bridge builder • People puzzler • Universal Humanizer
Massachusetts
Joined November 2009
- Tweets21.1K
- Following1.9K
- Followers6.5K
- Likes56.6K
Pinned Tweet
Normalize giving students problems they're not expected to immediately know how to solve.
#math #maths #mathed #iteachmath #MTBoS #thinkingclassroom
Matt Enlow retweeted
Steve Selvin, the creator of the Monty Hall paradox, has passed away at age 85.
If there aren’t three coffins at his funeral, he’s missed a huge opportunity.
Matt Enlow retweeted
Being a parent of a teenager in the modern digital environment means begging your kid to play Minecraft or do *something* even slightly less brain-rotting than watching short video content from Spotify, which is what they're started doing because you've blocked all YouTube content from the XBox devices at the router level and turned off the WiFi and limited the carrier data throughput after 9PM for their smart phones, which they legitimately need because that is how their coaches communicate with them about cheer routines or band practice
And if you dare to complain about how annoying it is to have this second job as an IT admin just to keep your kids from guzzling down the worlds shittiest content, half the internet calls you a bad parent for not locking them down more and the other half calls you a bad parent for being a content Nazi
My favorite Men Without Hats song
The Safety Parabola
Fire a cannon at the same speed at every angle and each shell draws its own parabola. Together they fill a region with a sharp edge: another parabola, y = v²/(2g) − g x²/(2v²). Every shell touches this curve exactly once and none crosses it. Anything outside it is completely safe. This is the safety parabola, first described by Evangelista Torricelli in the 1640s.
On flat ground the farthest shot is at 45°. Move the cannon to a 15 m cliff and the best angle drops to 40.4°, because the shell has more time to fall. The general answer is tan θ = v / √(v² + 2gh), and it needs no calculus once you see the envelope.
I would love for this to be true, but for precisely that reason it is setting off my BS detector.
When pressed, OP repeatedly just says “factchecker says it’s true” 🤨
Don’t let confirmation bias cloud your judgement.
The word is out about the Election Night Watch Party at the White House on Tuesday.
For weeks, Trump had been assured by Susie Wiles and his staff that all the polls were wrong, and that, once again, the Blue Wave would only be a ripple, if one even showed up at all. And the DOJ was ready to pounce on it if it did.
Trump, after all, was on the ballot. "Vote like I'm on the ballot,' he said, "Because I am."
He told every rally that. He said it on FOX. He had a 90% approval rate, he said. And $5000 checks for everybody. What could possibly go wrong?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
So the East Room was decked out with the finest crystal and china. Staffers thought it would be a fun "cheeky rebuke" to order in platters of finger food from Cheesecake Factory. Just to give a finger to Barack Obama, for his viral joke about Trump’s gaudy renovations to the White House.
EVERYONE showed up in their party clothes. His Staff. His Cabinet. Top GOP politicians. Donors.
But there was no Host or Hostess to greet them. Which was a little odd. The guests mingled among themselves, and waited to be formally welcomed and invited to sample the refreshments.
Where were Trump and Melania?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trump waited upstairs in his residence, in order to make a grand entrance to a standing ovation with cheers, once the happy results started pouring in.
And was Melania also waiting upstairs, to march in at his side?
Nope.
Melania was not at the White House at all. On election night, the most anticipated night in politics, with the rest of her husband's term on the line, Melania was somewhere else.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Finally at 8:00 the first election results came in. But during that entire first hour, not ONE Republican was named. It was only Democrat after Democrat, starting with Jon Ossoff.
Trump never came downstairs. At all.
Marco Rubio was the first to go missing, according to the Daily Mail. Then, one by one, the rest of the party goers slipped out the door.
Only two hours later, an enormous decision was called. Democrats had flipped the House of Representatives to their control. And in most cases, the Democrats won, not by slim majorities, but by double digits.
It was 10:00, and the East Room was empty. The party goers had gone to a nearby Washington bar to drown their sorrows. The Cheesecake Factory food lay untouched on the East Room tables.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
And Trump? He was upstairs watching the results on FOX News, and posting angrily on Truth Social.
He wasn't alone. No, Melania wasn't with him. But Natalie Harp was.
The Daily Mail reports that Susie Wiles, his Chief of Staff was upstairs as well. The one who had assured him day after day that Republicans would win.
By 11 pm, Trump stopped posting. “He’s watching Fox News barely uttering a word and paralyzed into silence,” a source close to the president told the Daily Mail.
“It’s very, very dark in the residence,” one senior official said of Trump’s mood. “It’s a dark scene.”
Another source said, “They were delusional right until the very end.”
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commentary by Glee Violette
1
260
Not the h-word I would have ended with, but 🤷🏼♂️ #iTeachMath
Hot take: This is not "mathematical reasoning."
#math problem 05-11-2026
Mathematical reasoning question from a high school-level test.
Matt Enlow retweeted
Something a middle-schooler emailed us about:
“A ‘combination lock’ should *technically* be called a ‘permutation lock,’ because the order of the numbers matters in permutations, but in combinations the order doesn’t matter.”
10/10, no notes.
Matt Enlow retweeted
How to be heterodox
1- Always wonder, "Am I wrong?" Be open to new evidence.
2- Steelman opposing views. (This is hard!)
3- Be nuanced in your own views. Black-and-white situations are uncommon.
4- Don't cut ties with political opponents! The other side is rarely evil. Critical here is separating leaders from regular folk. If you can't help but see Trump or Mamdani as evil, fine, but regular voters don't see what you see. They're doing their best with imperfect knowledge, so cut them some slack. Also, you might be wrong!
5- Be wary of knee-jerk contrarianism. Sometimes the mainstream is correct!
I've always found textbook exercises to be insufficient in improving understanding, so I've started whipping up some more "thoughtful" questions for Algebra II Honors. I'm particularly proud of this collection. Feel free to steal! #iTeachMath overleaf.com/project/6ae38b6…
Matt Enlow retweeted
If you haven’t read Amusing Ourselves to Death by Neil Postman, you don’t understand what your phone is doing to you. He wrote it in 1985, before the internet, and it is still the best book on the subject. Postman’s point is simple. Nobody has to ban books to make people stop thinking. You just have to give them something more fun to look at. Do that long enough and they lose the ability to pay attention to anything that isn’t entertaining. The news. Politics. Their own lives. He saw it happening with television. Now it is happening in your pocket, every day. Read it and you will finally understand why you can’t focus.
Matt Enlow retweeted
If someone posts a video and prefaces it with, “watch until the end,” skip it immediately.
Matt Enlow retweeted
From me @NRO, with a frightening warning to voters:
A List of Things Democrats Might Do If They Retake Power
nationalreview.com/corner/a-…
Do you provide review materials to your students before an upcoming test? To what extent do the questions therein resemble the questions on the test?
To what extent SHOULD they?
1
5
446
What is it with this guy and mathematicians emerging from caves and handing someone a slip of paper?
Math.
A mathematician emerges from a cave, hands you the paper below, and says: "Is it possible for a line to avoid passing through any locations where x and y are both rational)? The line may not be horizontal or vertical." What is your response?
1
4
453





















