hello there
United States
Joined March 2025
- Tweets511
- Following90
- Followers2.9K
- Likes895
Pinned Tweet
Acoustic analysis confirms shooter was near ground-level, ~70-90ft away — not a rooftop.
Crack–bang intervals across all recordings: 0.08–0.14s = 70–90 ft distance
(speed of sound @ 82°F = 1141 ft/s)
Closest audio clip shows total crack/bang overlap, impact clear = <100 ft
Smartski retweeted
The clarity in pattern and higher volume of audio waveforms from various videos of Charlie Kirk's assassination support the theory that the shooter was to CK's right and relatively close.
The official narrative places the shooter in a location that shows waveform patterns that are significantly less clear and lower in volume.
The second sound, which some theorize is the 'thump' in a 'crack-thump' pattern, is more simply explained as a microphone echo of the gunshot. This would explain why the second sound is unique to each video but matches the sound of the gunshot in that video.
"Acoustic gunshot signals exhibit significant variation according to the azimuth [horizontal distance]." - Tushar Routh and Robert Maher, Recording anechoic gunshot waveforms of several firearms at 500 kilohertz sampling rate
"According to the results, a decreasing of the volume, equivalent to the increasing of the distance, was remarked, as it was expected." - Nikolaos, Tsiatis E., Recording and Calculating Gunshot Sound—Change of the Volume in Reference to the Distance
Smartski retweeted
If .23 was truly the muzzle blast(bang), every recording would show that same gap, and they don't. That spike is an echo/reflection, or environmental transient, not the direct blast.
The top track shows a clear crack, with the bang rising around .05 and peaking ~.1
On the two closest recordings available(bottom 2), it's clear that the crack/bang are so tight they overlay, effectively sitting on top of each other
This is the first video I’ve seen from this angle…
You’re telling me the shot came from what would have been a rooftop directly behind these people, yet they’re crouching behind the railing?
These people would have been able to tell if it was from behind them, without a doubt.
I believe it’s actually one shot broken into parts: crack (0.00)→ reflected crack (~.05)→ bang(~.12), followed by further echos/reverberations(~.14). If it were two bullets, you’d see two full crack+bang pairs, not a thin HF spike followed by one LF boom.
Given the location this clip was recorded, it makes sense as it was in the corner of the courtyard essentially, and this is the only clip that truly has this much clear reverb/echo.
unavailable
Smartski retweeted
Questioning the events surrounding Charlie Kirk's tragic murder is NOT an act of disloyalty or cruelty, it is an important way of honoring Charlie's contributions by making sure that whoever was behind his murder is identified and brought to justice. I understand this entire discussion must be extremely painful for the Kirk family, but I hope that Erika and others know in their hearts that those of us who are asking these questions are doing so in good faith, not as an exercise in clickbait or hype, but in genuinely wanting to make sure that whoever took Charlie away from all of us doesn't get away with it! If Charlie's soul is looking at us right now, he must be screaming, "Find the real killer!" And that's exactly what we're trying to do, Charlie. Rest in peace. We owe it to him to keep asking questions until we get solid answers.
I didn’t pick an assumed location, caliber or a rifle, and work backwards. I used the method with the fewest assumptions: measure the crack/bang delay in every clip, convert Δt to distance using the speed of sound, and plot circles. Where they overlap is the only location consistent with all recordings.
The rooftop (~426 ft) would need ~0.37s crack/bang. None of the clips show anything close.
Different equations exist, but I chose the one that doesn’t require guessing bullet type/velocity. I also cross-checked every available source to rule out outliers/echos etc…
Hmmm let’s see
The internet has sleuthed that there was someone who moved the camera above Charlie’s head about 5 minutes after he was shot.
I was able to speak to that individual and see the footage and I’ll tell you what I saw— or more importantly, what I didn’t see.
youtube.com/live/aDlhjfW6hz8
