Work = on-prem hyperscaler. STEM & *Female* ⚽️ flag waver. Bleeding edge tech + spinning analogue. Opinions.mine != 4sale.

Manchester, England
Joined June 2015
Replying to @adilray
One day you think you're in the Rebel Alliance, the next day you've realised it's the Brownshirts.
10
Jan Vowhagan retweeted
The price of natural gas is the same all across Europe. That the UK's sky high electricity prices are 'because of the price of gas' is self-evidently untrue. Other countries pay the same gas prices but have much lower electricity prices. We must look elsewhere for the cause of our predicament Could it be our 'world-leading' renewables?
32
257
17
518
10,680
Jan Vowhagan retweeted
When Burnham tells you the AI revolution will bring jobs and prosperity, remember that’s misinformation. It won’t. Here’s a case study …. staggeringly profitable, Microsoft is offering redundancy to 26.9% of its entire workforce. That’s 60,000 people. It made $133.7 BILLION in profit last year and saved another $500 MILLION using AI in its call centres! And it’s told investors it expects double digit growth in revenue and profits next year, while its workforce will shrink further . The government is lying.
49
391
5
952
10,987
Jan Vowhagan retweeted
China consumed more coal in the last four years (2022–2025) than the entire world consumed throughout the 19th century.
82
1,008
163
5,412
174,123
Jan Vowhagan retweeted
Astounding Sunday Times investigation reveals new scandal in SNP’s Socialist Scotland: 800 NHS, central government, council and quango workers whose jobs no longer exist but remain on the public payroll because of the SNP’s ‘no public-sector redundancy’ policy. Estimated cost of paying people to do nothing: £27m a year. One NHS Highland worker has been receiving a full salary and benefits for 17 years despite not having a specific job. The health board refused to say what the worker had been doing for almost two decades and how much they had been paid. Likely cost to the taxpayer is expected to be far higher with several public bodies refusing to disclose salaries for hundreds of the workers awaiting redeployment.
372
2,095
170
6,371
280,344
My report makes six key recommendations: Fix the broken understanding of how the gas market works. Policymakers should recognise that British gas production is not sold on global markets at a global price. The GB gas market uses marginal pricing and additional domestic production displaces more expensive LNG imports, thereby reducing British gas prices. The report argues that claims that additional UK production cannot affect domestic prices are simply wrong. Increase UK Continental Shelf gas production. Domestic gas should be preferred to imports wherever possible. UKCS gas is both cheaper and cleaner than imported LNG and provides a secure source of supply directly connected to the British gas network. Reduce reliance on electricity imports. Britain is increasingly depending on electricity imports during periods of low domestic renewable generation. However, highly correlated weather patterns mean low wind generation in Britain can coincide with shortages elsewhere. The report warns that Norway and France cannot be assumed to provide unlimited electricity to their neighbours during periods of stress. Model gas and electricity security together. The gas grid transports far more energy than the electricity network. Electrifying heating will take decades while gas-fired generation will remain critical to electricity security for years to come. The report argues that planning should recognise the interdependencies of gas and electricity to a greater extent. Focus on cheap energy. Rapidly rising network costs are overtaking fuel costs as the main driver of energy bills. The report calls for tighter control of network expenditure and for the suspension of the Connect & Manage regime, arguing that consumers should not be required to fund expensive infrastructure whose output is frequently constrained or wasted. Treat energy security as national security. The government should subject energy policy to an explicit national-security test, prioritising resilience, diversity of supply, sufficient domestic energy capacity and the preservation of strategically important industrial capability alongside affordability and sustainability. watt-logic.com/wp-content/up…
52
500
31
1,330
21,931
🚨Sneaked out by OFGEM this morning, a warning for the first time EVER they cannot guarantee that demand will be met on a peak day in winter. Let’s be clear what that means. They cannot guarantee that homes will be warm, lights come on or industry function on a peak day this winter. And why? Because of an accelerated decline in domestic gas supply from the North Sea. So what is the solution? For British bill payers to pay more, to IMPORT more from Europe (specifically Belgium) to keep the lights on in Britain. Britain. A country with vast supplies of gas, untapped, deliberately due to Labour policy now going cap in hand to Europe and paying vast sums to import foreign gas. It is utterly outrageous. You couldn’t make it up. ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/f…
443
1,660
157
4,997
239,965
The IPPR has had taxpayer funding too (£285,500, 2020-24). And check out its other funders, including £725,001–£750,000 from George Soros’s Open Society Foundations: ippr.org/who-we-are/how-we-a…
The IPPR who produced this drivel are an "independent" registered charity funded by "charitable trusts, foundations, businesses, unions, voluntary sector organisations, local government, national government departments and individuals." We need a UK DOGE.
10
125
1
262
3,137
Jan Vowhagan retweeted
With Microsoft cancelling its data centre in Essex, one point is surely clear. For the British economy reducing energy costs is now a national emergency.
53
154
11
1,311
36,176
Jan Vowhagan retweeted
Important News: @Ofgem’s just launched a ‘consultation’ about switching on the Market Stabilisation Charge as soon as November. It doesn’t sound a big deal, but it could be, it ain’t good for consumers and I don't want it to slip under the radar. In a nutshell, it means if wholesale energy prices drop sharply, the cheap fixes and switcher’s deals offered will be a lot more expensive, in order to protect energy firms’ profits. That’s because any firm taking on a new customer, including on a cheap fix or other specialist tariff, will have to pay compensation to that customer’s old supplier, if they switch. It's basically a form of switching penalty. While technically this is a consultation, it’s one of those where Ofgem has made up its mind, but is required to consult - it will almost certainly happen. Below is my ‘first look’ explainer on this... ------------------------ How it works (simplified to make it easy to understand): Ofgem decided to put this power back into suppliers’ licences in May, so it could switch it on quickly if needed, and now it is trying to do just that. It means if wholesale prices drop more than 10% below the level built into the Price Cap (and remember the January Price Cap is currently predicted to be 25% higher than now), and someone switches supplier from that or any tariff, the new firm must pay the old one 85% of the drop in wholesale rates beyond that 10%. So very roughly, say the wholesale energy in the Price Cap costs £1,000 (a made-up number, to keep it simple. This is about proportions, not exact amounts): - If prices drop to £900, there’s no Market Stabilisation Charge.\ - If prices drop to £800, you get the first £100 drop, but 85% of the next £100 (£85) goes to your old supplier. So almost certainly the new firm will make you pay the difference, meaning the tariff will be up to £85 more than it would otherwise have been (other factors could affect the amount, but this is a rough illustration) In other words, the new supplier can’t pass a chunk of the saving from lower wholesale rates on to you, because it has to hand much of it to your old supplier. Why Ofgem says it’s doing this Its argument is that the Price Cap requires suppliers buy energy in advance. If wholesale rates fall sharply and people leave in large numbers, those suppliers would be left out of pocket, and it doesn’t want suppliers who did the right thing by buying energy in advance to be penalised. My View I don’t like it. This is a ‘Market Stabilisation Charge’ but the supplier market is pretty stable, and I doubt we are at the domino risk of suppliers going bust in the way they did in the early twenties. A good few energy firms have made large profits since then, and protecting them over winter by effectively dampening competition because it’s ‘not their fault’ feels raw. After all we don’t take their profits off them when they make them ‘through no fault’. Until now, my hope had been that at some point the Middle East situation would de-escalate, wholesale rates would drop. While it would take months for that to feed into the Price Cap, other cheaper tariffs would be available to switch to. That would still happen, but the savings could be no-where near as good as otherwise. ------------ As noted, these are my provisional thoughts and this has only just come out. I will need to do more looking/thinking.
372
637
87
1,603
474,400
UK 🇬🇧 The Drax net zero con-trick - where a massive polluter has become a net zero manipulator. Yet more net zero environmental destruction masquerading as “saving the planet”. The Labour government is trying to force through an extension that would give Drax an estimated £1.8bn in taxpayer funded subsidies on top of the £11bn it has already received. Drax has burned an amount of wood equivalent to 300 million trees. Burning wood creates 18% more CO2 emissions than coal. And here’s the con trick: Drax is a sneaky way of exporting our CO2 emissions. We pay billions of pounds to cut down ancient forests in the US and Canada, ship the wood across the Atlantic in diesel tankers, then burn it in a Yorkshire-based power station. And here’s the kicker - the CO2 emissions tally is not counted against the country that burns it, but the country that grows it. So Drax emissions are counted against the countries who grow and export the wood for Drax - like Canada and USA…not UK who burn it. So the UK can reduce CO2 figures by importing the burning wood grown elsewhere. A gigantic net zero con-trick.
70
824
46
1,581
17,718
Jan Vowhagan retweeted
No seriously, someone needs to sort this mess out. We’re paying to generate electricity, paying NOT to generate it, and paying AGAIN to replace it. Actually we spent £505 MILLION in balancing costs in September alone! And the annual bill could reach £8 BILLION by 2030! this is not the future of cheap energy 🤡
154
1,650
108
3,305
47,993
Jan Vowhagan retweeted
Ok you have to laugh … the out of work immigrant population in Birmingham are complaining. “In Birmingham, our reporter interviewed a local man named Mohammad Khan. And he said: “Here it is hard to get a job. A lot of students come and pick up part-time jobs. They take over the housing. They work for a lower rate and they can speak English.” “ In a …how dare British students who speak English come here and take our jobs - sort of way 🤡 Full very funny article from the Telegraph
112
1,385
69
6,961
125,189
Jan Vowhagan retweeted
Looks like Burnham’s National Centre for Information Defence already has its first case…
78
1,137
35
5,206
66,111
Another week, another whiff of sulphur surrounding the Government’s handling of the official Islamophobia definition, repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility”. An FOI request from @NJTimothy revealed that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) had deleted all responses to the Working Group on Islamophobia that informed the definition. After the disclosure, the Free Speech Union threatened legal action unless the Ministry revealed who had been consulted during the drafting process. The definition has already been weaponised to silence legitimate criticism of Islam. Following a lengthy delay and an investigation by Will Garton, MHCLG’s top civil servant, the Ministry wrote to both Mr Timothy and the FSU. It admitted that the records were still held on its systems, but refused to show them to us. Did officials lose these important documents down the back of the sofa, or did they try to cover up the possibility that extremists had been allowed to influence a definition that has been weaponised against those who criticise, mock or debate Islam since its publication in March? The public deserves to know the truth. Read more from FSU Campaigns Officer @MaxHThompson 👇
57
1,008
24
2,932
20,429
Why are energy bills so high? Well this won't help.... @neso_energy spent £400,000 of OUR money on PR after the near blackout on 23 June when it was forced to cut exports to the Netherlands and allegedly breached multiple grid constraints while frequency sagged According to @thetimes, *NESO, which is government-owned, has disclosed that it agreed to spend £250,000 plus VAT with Burson and £85,806 plus VAT with iNHouse Communications to provide “strategic counsel and guidance” and “media support” in the wake of the incident. The agreements were signed after whistleblower allegations and scrutiny of Neso’s management of grid stability during the June heatwave." So first NESO does a bad job of keeping the grid stable, being forced into emergency actions Then whistleblowers claim the grid wasn't secure, constraints were breached and that the comms team was involved in operational decision-making, something which NESO admitted was true Instead of addressing the concerns it decided to spend £££ on a nothing-to-see-here PR campaign While issuing multiple previously unheard-of summer and autumn margin warnings, breaching interconnector trading limits, making big forecasting errors and having to undertake emergency actions again just this past evening Clearly it was money well spent 🙄 thetimes.com/uk/politics/art…
20
270
15
764
11,513
10
243
1
879
11,926
Why not create a path to ownership for car thieves instead of focusing only on incarceration?
Why not create a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants instead of focusing only on deportation? 🤔
102
507
19
8,415
78,562
Replying to @neso_energy
@neso_energy has another Electricity Margin Notice in place for today... Shortfall 1840 MW for 3pm to 11pm today This is an unusually wide timeframe covering far more than just the evening peak So what's going on? Wind is set to be low dipping to 1700 MW at 6pm Solar will peak at 6758 MW at 1pm, be at 5882 MW at 3pm and zero from 7pm Interconnectors are nominated to export the max capacity of 8756 MW between 12:30pm and 2pm. Imports and then nominated to fall to 6285 MW at 3pm, 435 MW at 5pm and then flip to exports reaching 1979 MW between 6:30pm and 7pm. Exports are then set to fall, with the cables flipping to imports of 528 MW between 8:30pm and 9pm before heading back to export mode with exports reaching 1282 MW at 10:30pm which is the last available time right now Demand is forecast at 33,203 MW at 3pm, peaking for the evening at 33,940 MW at 7:30pm and then falling to 25,843 MW by 11pm The grid will be tightest between 5:30pm and 8pm where NESO will need imports to meet demand As before I expect NESO will turn to intraday SO-SO trades on the interconnectors to resolve this. It has been consistently buying back up to the cap for quite a large part of the past day and since 5:30am this morning I expect this will continue but I also expect the cap of 1500 MW in any settlement period to be breached. Again @Miatsf @mgshanks @AndrewBowie_MP @ClaireCoutinho @ColinMoynihanUK @griffitha @HarrietCross_MP @drlukeevans @ashley7fox @TiceRichard @cmackinlay @mattwridley @DavidGHFrost @Iromg @AllisonPearson @MerrynSW @EdConwaySky @afneil @mattotele @jonathan_leake @julietsamuel @energygovuk
42
143
27
404
29,378
Jan Vowhagan retweeted
My sister's longtime dentist practice got bought out by a private equity-backed dental group four months ago. Same office. Same hygienists. Same chairs. Zero new equipment. Last week they sent the new fee schedule for anyone with insurance. A routine cleaning that used to run $120 is now billed at $310, with the group quietly dropping several insurance plans they used to accept. When patients asked why, the new regional manager gave a scripted line about "aligning with market standards." Private equity figured out the same trick everywhere. They're buying up the things you can't opt out of: dental, veterinary care, urgent care, hospice, because they know you can't just skip your kid's cavity or your dog's surgery. This isn't inflation. It's leveraged debt getting loaded onto places you have no choice but to keep paying.
514
3,208
264
12,132
1,032,851