Aldous Huxley's Ghost™ retweeted
In free nations, we investigate crimes to see who is guilty of them.
In communist tyrannies, they investigate men to see what they can be punished for.
Aldous Huxley's Ghost™ retweeted
If, by the way, the same situation that just happened in Brazil had happened but with the parties switched -- if Bolsonaro had won last night's election and then a pro-Bolsonaro judge sent the Federal Police to seize Lula's passport and bar him from leaving the country -- every major western media outlet and liberal NGOs would be screaming about the authoritarian attack on Brazil's elections and the destruction of basic freedoms.
>be Lula
>get convicted of corruption
>get sentenced to 12 years
>get released by the STF on procedural errors
>never actually acquitted lmao
>beat Jair Bolsonaro in 2022
>Jair gets thrown into jail over an alleged coup attempt
>Congress votes to cut his sentence
>Lula vetoes it
>four years later, face his son
>during a debate, threaten to also lock him up if he loses the election
>election day
>former private lawyer, now STF judge, extends voting by 2 hours nationwide
>request came from Lula's own coalition
>win by 4 million votes in a runoff with no paper trail
>next day, Moraes orders the losing candidate to surrender his passports
>victory speech: "we're going to regulate social media"
>"democracy" lmao
>RIP Brazil
Aldous Huxley's Ghost™ retweeted
One day after Lula was declared the winner of Brazil's elections, his opponent -- Sen. Flavio Bolsonaro -- just had had his passport seized by the Federal Police.
Theose police were sent by notorious tyrant Judge Alexandre de Moraes. What a lovely democratic image.
New euphemism just dropped: "reckless visitors."
Reckless visitors are destroying Yellowstone's iconic thermal pools with trash trib.al/Y1FiFXN
Aldous Huxley's Ghost™ retweeted
Show us pictures of some of these “reckless visitors.” I have a hypothesis.
Reckless visitors are destroying Yellowstone's iconic thermal pools with trash trib.al/Y1FiFXN
Aldous Huxley's Ghost™ retweeted
Regardez bien ce qui s'est passé au Brésil dimanche.
Les bureaux de vote ferment. Le dépouillement commence. Et là, un seul juge de la Cour suprême décide de prolonger le vote de deux heures, dans tout le pays. Le tribunal électoral suspend le comptage en urgence. Selon la presse brésilienne, ses propres membres étaient contre.
Résultat : pour la première fois depuis le retour de la démocratie au Brésil, le candidat battu au premier tour remporte le second.
Peut-être que tout est propre. Mais quand les règles d'un scrutin changent pendant le scrutin, sur décision d'un homme que personne n'a élu, la confiance meurt. Et une démocratie sans confiance n'est plus qu'un décor de théâtre.
Maintenant, regardez qui applaudit.
Alex Soros : « Félicitations au Brésil pour avoir, une fois de plus, tenu tête à l'autoritarisme. »
Ursula von der Leyen : « La démocratie et le multilatéralisme ont gagné. »
Pedro Sánchez, à un mois de ses propres élections, annonce que « la remontée mondiale du progressisme » va arriver en Espagne.
Ils ne se cachent même plus. L'autoritarisme, c'est un peuple qui vote mal. La démocratie, c'est un juge qui garde les urnes ouvertes jusqu'à ce que le résultat soit le bon.
Ils ont compris une chose : le réel est contre eux. L'immigration, l'insécurité, le déclassement, la dette. Le réel est trop fort, trop violent, et sur le terrain des idées, ils ne gagnent plus. Alors le combat se déplace : les tribunaux, les procédures, les horaires, les inéligibilités.
En France, on connaît déjà la musique. On a déjà vu des juges décider de qui a le droit de se présenter.
Le Brésil n'est pas une exception. C'est un prototype. Il y a de fortes chances que ce scénario se rejoue partout en Occident, dans chaque pays où ils n'ont pas encore perdu.
Alors préparez-vous. Pas seulement à faire campagne : à protéger le scrutin. Des assesseurs dans chaque bureau. Des avocats prêts le soir même. Chaque règle connue par cœur. Chaque procès-verbal photographié.
Gagner ne suffira pas. Il faudra gagner avec une marge qu'aucun juge ne pourra effacer, et surveiller chaque urne jusqu'au dernier bulletin.
Le réel est de notre côté. Encore faut-il qu'on nous laisse le compter.
Bukele l’a dit clairement :
« Si vous n’impeachez pas les juges corrompus, vous NE POUVEZ PAS réformer le pays. Ils formeront un cartel (une dictature judiciaire) et bloqueront toutes les réformes. »
Le Brésil vient de le montrer en direct.
La France le pratique depuis des décennies, plus discrètement.
Le suffrage universel n’a de sens que si le dernier mot appartient aux élus, pas à un réseau de magistrats irrévocables qui interprètent les règles selon leurs intérêts.
Sans destitution réelle des juges politiques, les élections restent un théâtre.
Le cartel reste en place.
A bon entendeur.
Aldous Huxley's Ghost™ retweeted
You don't even have to go back 5 years. I presume these have morphed into NATIONALIZE STARLINK NOW accounts
Aldous Huxley's Ghost™ retweeted
If you gave Joseph Goebbels five years and half a billion dollars, he couldn't come up with something this racist.
I mean, I thought *I* was getting more racist by the day, but in one fell swoop, Netflix has surpassed me, literally without even trying.
I mean, just look at her face. At the shape of her skull. Actual chimpanzees don't look like that.
I think there's a lesson here. Things we worship, like things we despise, become stereotypes. They become reduced to what we hate, or worship, about them.
In this case, Netflix is venerating Africans with such passion and vehemence, that the African character they worship becomes, not an individual with individual traits as well as African traits, but a sort of avatar of African-ness, complete with exaggerated hoodrat behavior that Netflix no longer realizes is obnoxious to civilized people.
This was always the destination point. Because to today's standard gay race communist, Africans and other venerated races do not exist as individual people, but as symbols with which to signal what they deem anti-racism, and therefore virtue.
In this, they generalize more than the most vehement of racists, because even Joseph Goebbels understood that variations exist among races he considered almost universally subhuman. Goebbels would not be confused by the existence of Thomas Sowell. He would simply consider the exclusion of Thomas Sowell to be acceptable collateral damage.
To the gay race communists at Netflix, however, Africans are not people, and they are not people in a whole new way. They are simply vessels carrying a sort of quintessential African-ness, which is to worshiped in the abstract, for the purpose of status competition.
Their individualized traits do not serve this purpose, so when Netflix invents an African character to venerate, there are no such traits to be seen.
It's just hoodrat all the way down.
Aldous Huxley's Ghost™ retweeted
‘American Communist’ sounds as oxymoronic as ‘Democratic Socialist’ but they sure have hate and violence in the right order in 2026 🤢🤮:
Aldous Huxley's Ghost™ retweeted
Robert Reich in 2025: Trump is a fascist dictator for even suggesting that a company be taken over by the government and for telling a CEO what to do.
Robert Reich in 2026: SpaceX and Starlink must be taken over by the government.
Small man, giant fraud.
Somehow the same people who we're told are such a benefit to the United States are a huge burden to their own countries.
#BREAKING: Haiti says it's “overwhelmed” by illegals deported from the United States.
Socialists calling for nationalization of private enterprise goes back a long ways. At least back to the 1930s.
Aldous Huxley's Ghost™ retweeted
So in other words -- seize the means of production?
Those silly Bolsheviks are at it again....




































