Andrew Finck Official account of Ancient History Criticisms on YouTube. Art historian investigating ancient sites. Please consider subscribing to my colleagues.
Kentucky, USA
Joined March 2020
- Tweets38.2K
- Following95
- Followers11K
- Likes107K
Ancient History Criticisms retweeted
Pay attention to what is being said here. Nubs are not evidence of “GeoPolymer”.
Why? - Because GeoPolymer wouldn’t leave geological veins across the box.
Another box from Kyzikos, Turkey. AI: "The faint grey and dark stripes running horizontally across this marble sarcophagus are natural geological veins inside the Proconnesian marble from which it was carved. These are not painted on, nor are they stains from weathering." #nubs
Ancient History Criticisms retweeted
Because it's shaped like a Shiva Linga (there's several shapes). The bigger the more holy, from what I can tell.
It's all performative theatrics for Indian normies. The real holy hallmarks are the nubs on their stone temples, they won't acknowledge it, but you can clearly see it
Ancient History Criticisms retweeted
I mean, hello?
There are secret occult groups associated with masonry. Literally called FREEmasonry. Free, given, proffered, supplanted. They built our reality. We live in their simulacrum.
Who's getting sued, imprisoned, killed for talking about Atlantis or Flat Earth? Nobody
Ancient History Criticisms retweeted
You just gave the subject more pause and consideration with that one tweet than all the rest of the alternative history researchers.
That's the problem, there's an elephant in the alternative history room, and all I see is everyone ignoring it.
Ancient History Criticisms retweeted
Do you believe these enormous 100 ton sarcophagus, sitting in the Serapeum of Saqqara in Egypt are made with geopolymer?
If so, please explain how the quartz veins run across the boxes.
Ancient History Criticisms retweeted
This map shows most of the locations where Nubs have been identified by @AHC_Channel @ziggydan1 @history_rev
Ancient History Criticisms retweeted
I can't entertain any bronze-age theories like "a ruler wanted to cover something up", because this isn't bronze-age evidence at all.
There's a huge disconnect, a massive abyssal gulf between how the sites were manufactured, and what is inferred by the iconography and artwork.
Ancient History Criticisms retweeted
The menhir of La Croterie in Chauvé (Loire-Atlantique) is 4.2m tall and 3.5m wide at the base of the broad face. A recumbent stone behind may have been a twin or may never have stood. Card by Chapeau in Nantes. #StandingStoneSunday.
Ancient History Criticisms retweeted
Ollataytambo. Transportation Of Megaliths And A Dark Past youtu.be/JYGzBqKE1xQ?si=xRYX… via @YouTube
Ancient History Criticisms retweeted
IF we are to believe Japanese historical accounts...
Which culture told the truth, if any? Which culture knew the truth and how would we know if they never told the public?
Ancient History Criticisms retweeted
The diagonally-repeating "L" shaped blocks are consistent as well.
Ancient History Criticisms retweeted
And it exhibits faux-joinery, just like Saqsaywaman. @OurHiddenPast
Ancient History Criticisms retweeted
Hameau du Menhir in Glomel (Côtes-d’Armor) is among the biggest menhirs in Bretagne standing 8.5m tall and measuring 4x1.5m at the base. Made of granite it is estimated to weigh at least 80 tons. Card by Le Cunf in Pontivy 1910 or earlier.
