Angelus iustitiae

🇪🇺 Since 2013, under the command of the U.N. General Assembly documents have been leaked where the European Commission (EU) is working on a draft of mass surveillance to its own citizens. All conspiracies, right? Spy agencies across Western Europe are working together on mass surveillance of Internet and phone traffic comparable to programmes run by their U.S. counterpart denounced by European governments, Britain’s Guardian newspaper reported on Saturday. The report is potentially embarrassing for governments, especially in Germany and France which have been the most vocal in protesting about U.S. mass surveillance of European communication networks revealed by Snowden since June. euroweeklynews.com/2013/11/0…

💨 Climate lies and AI: UN just unsettled the climate change “settled science” For years, the warnings were dire: radically change how we live, how we travel, and how we power our homes—or face climate catastrophe. Now, a major reassessment of one of the most extreme emissions scenarios is reopening the conversation. What happens to the countries that have already overhauled their energy policies around those earlier predictions?

🇫🇷 Planning to Visit Europe? A Preview of Your Paris Tour An AI creator reimagines Paris tourism by turning the City of Love into a chaotic scene of riots, fires, and destruction, while a cheerful tour guide proceeds as if everything is normal (reality becoming fiction, or vice versa?). Created by AI filmmaker Wytse Koetse, the satirical video exaggerates France’s recent protests into an absurd tourism commercial. Highly detailed visuals make the fictional chaos feel realistic and convincing. AI’s progress is striking: it transforms an unusual idea into a full cinematic commercial with realistic environments, dramatic scenes, and dark humor.

🤔 Perspective Doesn’t Change the Truth — It Completes It Two people can look at the exact same situation and walk away with completely different truths. That doesn’t always mean one of them is wrong. Sometimes they’re simply standing in different places. In this demonstration, two men face the same object and describe it in opposite ways — each one certain he’s right. Only when they switch sides does the realization land: What you see depends heavily on where you stand. That lesson doesn’t stay in this room. In business, relationships, arguments, and everyday life, we tend to treat our viewpoint as the full picture. Perspective has a quiet way of revealing what we couldn’t see before. You don’t have to abandon your own point of view to understand someone else’s. Sometimes you just have to be willing to move. Perspective doesn’t change the truth. It completes it.

🇺🇸🇪🇺 USA versus the EU: do I need to say more? #Tesla

👩‍💻 Giggle, for women Sall Grover went to court to establish what a woman is. She lost. Twice. At ARC 2026, she told her story. Grover built Giggle, a social networking app exclusively for women. In January 2022, fourteen weeks pregnant, she received an Australian Human Rights Commission complaint from a man who identifies as a woman and wanted access to the app. To settle, she was told she would have to let him on, admit all men who identify as women, attend sex and gender education classes, pay him $20,000, apologise, and moderate all content on the app so that men who identify as women would not be offended by what women were saying. She refused and went to federal court instead. The judge ruled that sex is changeable, found she had engaged in indirect discrimination, and ordered her to pay $10,000 in damages—in part because, during cross-examination, she briefly laughed at a satirical caricature of the complainant. People often ask if she regrets it. “No. It isn’t easier to submit to an ideology you know isn’t true. To give up your rights and watch society crumble under the weight of nonsense.”

💰 Digital Control Grid (Panopticon Prison) Catherine Austin Fitts warns that the digital control grid could be advancing faster than most people realize. She argues that the real threat may not stop with CBDCs. It could instead arrive through stablecoins, tokenized bank deposits, digital ID systems, AI, and programmable money. “This could become a digital slavery system,” Fitts told Michelle Makori. She added that we could be just a couple of years away.

💭 Katie Hopkins nails the real meaning of tolerance and inclusion. 👇

🕺The Difference Between a Good Man and a Good Guy Matthew McConaughey was born on November 4, 1969, in Texas. Academy Award-winning actor, author, and speaker, he is known less for charm than for a stubborn kind of clarity: he knows what he stands for, and what he will not. He has drawn a clean line between a good guy and a good man. A good guy gets along. He says yes easily, keeps the peace, and is rarely sure what he stands for or against. A good man has ideals. He will defend them, and he will oppose what contradicts them. When those beliefs are tested, McConaughey says, a good man is not a nice guy. Being one is harder for a reason. You will not always be the most popular person in the room. His own career became the proof. Early on, Hollywood kept handing him the same roles: the easygoing lead, the likable romantic, the good guy who never complicated the story. The work paid well and felt like a Saturday. It also boxed him in. Instead of taking the smoother road, he stepped away, turned down parts that did not match what he wanted to stand for, and waited for roles with more weight and conflict. That choice cost him time and certainty. It also reset his career. The later work—dramas, an Oscar, books, and talks—grew out of that refusal to stay agreeable. He has argued that real growth starts when you leave the comfort of being liked and trust a slower, stricter process: discipline, self-belief, and the willingness to lead when it would be easier to sit back. Through films, writing, and public conversation, he keeps returning to the same idea. Live on purpose. Meet the hard parts. Write your own story instead of performing the one that keeps everyone comfortable. His path is a reminder that the lasting version of success is not becoming the good guy everyone approves of. It is becoming the good man you can still respect when the approval is gone.

🇪🇺🇷🇺 The Russians are Coming! Are they really? Putin says he will not attack Europe. Lavrov says the same. Lithuania’s prime minister asked Rutte for the intelligence; the answer was none. The invasion date keeps moving; the bill does not. If the Russians are not coming, who exactly are we rearming against, and why is the continent going broke to fight a war it is not in?

👠 When flags were haute couture — be proud of who you are. No labels. Naomi Campbell, Claudia Schiffer, Christy Turlington, and Nadja Auermann: the legendary finale of Chanel Fall/Winter 1994. In Paris, fall 1994, Karl Lagerfeld did not simply close a collection. He staged one of prêt-à-porter’s most theatrical images. At the height of the supermodel era, the runway became a world stage: the biggest faces in fashion walked out wrapped in the flags of their nations. Against reinvented tweed, grunge grit, and city-sharp attitude, the finale turned identity into spectacle. Nadja Auermann carried Germany with that architectural, almost imperial poise. Claudia Schiffer, Naomi Campbell, and Christy Turlington followed in a procession of power, glamour, and pop unity. Clothes receded. Presence took over. Lagerfeld’s point was unmistakable: fashion was no longer a Parisian secret. It was a global language — and the supermodel was the dialect everyone understood. This was more than a last walk. It was the decade’s verdict. These women did not merely wear the house. For one glittering minute, they were the house, the world, and the culture all at once — proud of who they were, unboxed, unapologetic. A pure snapshot of ’90s fashion history: flags as couture, fame as diplomacy, and supermodels as the last empire that needed no permission to exist.

🤕 The First Casualty of War Is Truth The next attack on Europe may be designed to fool you. It may be real and still designed to confuse you about who did it. The first version of an attack is often the weapon: false flag versus deniable sabotage. When the next incident hits, do not ask only “who benefits?” Ask what is actually known, what is still alleged, and what would change if the first culprit is wrong. The first casualty of war is the truth. The second is often patience. #Russia #Ukrain

🇳🇱🇮🇱 Criminalising Suitcases The Netherlands has turned a political campaign against Israeli activity beyond the 1967 lines into criminal customs law. This dangerous precedent treats ordinary travellers as enforcement targets in a territorial dispute and invites copycat rules that punish people for a product’s origin. The Netherlands now inspects luggage arriving from Israel for goods produced wholly or partly in West Bank settlements, East Jerusalem or the Golan Heights. The ban covers souvenirs, gifts and personal items, not just commercial imports. Intentional violations can carry up to six years in prison; unintentional ones up to a year, though prosecutors are expected to focus on deliberate or systematic cases rather than every tourist bottle of wine. Israel has given Dutch diplomats in Ramallah seven days to return their Israeli-issued credentials, after which the privileges expire. Israeli officials say passengers arriving from Israel are being stopped and their bags opened. If others copy this model, Israelis could face similar origin checks at more borders.

👟 Just Do It How did we go from Nike ads that celebrated drive, grit, and pushing past the limit to the kind of politicized, message-heavy campaigns we have seen more recently? Nike’s 2019 “Dream Crazier” spot, narrated by Serena Williams, became one of the brand’s most discussed campaigns around women in sport. It premiered during the Oscars and focused on a familiar double standard: female athletes being called “dramatic,” “emotional,” or “crazy” for showing the same intensity that is often praised in men. The ad featured high-profile athletes, including Williams herself, and argued that those labels should not be treated as insults. They should be used as fuel. The closing line captured the whole idea: if people want to call ambitious women crazy, show them what “crazy” can actually do. In other words, Nike took a common put-down and turned it into the campaign’s entire thesis.

🇪🇺 Politicians who want the war won’t fight it. Why should we?

🪖 Protests erupted in Germany; MSM froze. On Friday, 25 September 2026, organizers say 45,000 students walked out in over 100 German cities to strike against conscription. Why did we barely see the pictures on the big news channels? Does it not fit the story that we must “get ready”? MSM near-silence will not silence us. We do not agree to conscription. Von der Leyen, Merz, Macron, Sánchez, Burnham, Tusk, Rutte, Stubb, Kallas — they push this war. They will not enlist. They will not fight it. Why should we? The feeling of fighting for our countries was lost when they branded and criminalized us for wanting our countries to remain our own. We do not agree to die in a war that could and should be avoided — Russia and Ukraine are no exception — just to cover up their failures. You may skip the protests on TV. Information will still travel. That is why governments and MSM want social media under control. Have enough mothers lost their sons? Haven’t we had enough heartbreak? It’s the same old theme. We are not zombies.

🇪🇺 It’s Not Putin. It’s Your Own Government Covering Its Failures. We don’t have to worry about Putin. We have to worry about our own government. The biggest threat to us is not a foreign leader. It is the government we live under. It isn’t Putin taxing us for no good reason. It isn’t Putin arresting people over social media posts. It isn’t Putin allowing rape and criminal gangs to operate in the whole Europe with peculiar independence and almost no legal consequence. It isn’t Putin. It’s the government we pay for. It isn’t Putin telling us that the sacrifices our grandparents made in the Second World War, that our fathers made in the Falklands, that soldiers made in Afghanistan and Iraq, were for nothing. It isn’t Putin. It’s our leaders. And it doesn’t matter if the leader is a woman or a man, white or black, charismatic or dull. That’s irrelevant. The system keeps its control either way, no matter which puppet they place at the top.

🚘 Joe Rogan's reaction to Elon Musk's Cybertruck became one of the most talked-about moments on The Joe Rogan Experience. Rogan examined Tesla's futuristic electric pickup and its unusual design, technology, and engineering. The Cybertruck stood out for its bold stainless-steel exterior and unconventional design. Musk explained how it challenged traditional pickup truck expectations. Rogan discussed its features and the possibilities of electric vehicles with characteristic curiosity. The conversation highlighted engineering, creativity, and the future of transportation. Revolutionary or controversial, the Cybertruck is one of the most recognizable vehicles of the modern era. Musk's vision and Rogan's curiosity made it another memorable example of how JRE technology discussions capture global attention.