Be your own rescue
United States
Joined November 2017
- Tweets4.1K
- Following564
- Followers946
- Likes4.6K
Pinned Tweet
@WhiteHouse Just finish creating trump accounts for my 4 black children
Obama would never
That part
$NVDA: Let's say Jensen Huang slept with 10 different women...let's say 20. Does it change anything?
I thought the big deal was that he slept with a spy. Now consensual sex is an issue too? The coordinated effort to smear and attack an icon is an obvious ploy to take him out as head of $NVDA ... But by whom? I want an investigation into THAT!
1
47
Jonathan Green retweeted
[ Market Manifesto: Ep 30 ]
Slop Cash pays open-source contributors for work that gets merged, not work that gets submitted. The public round filled in under 15 minutes.
This week @mil_itia and @shawmakesmagic share their story, from NYC neighbors to building and growing @SlopCash.
Jonathan Green retweeted
first Slop Cash decision market is up 👀
Slop only counts merged work, so referrals would only count once the project you brought pays its contributors
no signup farming. results or nothing
and me and @shawmakesmagic can’t receive any of it. founders are excluded
The first Slop Cash decision market is open.
Should the treasury put 2,000,000 SLOP behind a referral program?
Referrers would get tokens only once a project they brought in pays its contributors. Slop’s founders are excluded.
Holders decide within 24h.
app.umia.finance/p/slop-cash…
Jonathan Green retweeted
New pool on @SlopCash: TOON Plugins, Claude Code plugins that let agents post, host git repos and pay per write on @toonprotocol
250 USDC/mo on Base for merged work. Vault’s still being set up, but I’m funding it myself.
Disclosure: I’m a TOON partner.
slop.cash/projects/toon-plug…
Jonathan Green retweeted
Paying for things online usually means a separate account for every service: a signup, an API key, a card on file.
An agent on TOON tops up once and pays apps across the network from that one balance.
One morning, from inside an agent’s rented box:
- Read a web page: 0.001 USDC
- Rented a machine to run Python: 0.0082 USDC
- Published a post: 0.001 USDC
Three apps. One balance. No signups.
Jonathan Green retweeted
Here is the flywheel almost nobody is paying attention to. Breaches aren’t rare events anymore. They’re the baseline. Nearly 2,000 breach sources this year have already exposed over 11 billion records, and U.S. victim notices hit 471 million in the first half of 2026 alone (already 60% above the entire previous year).
And the reason it keeps happening is structural. Any company storing a central record of what its users do is holding a target, and it takes one leaked credential, one insider, or one misconfiguration to spill all of it at once. A centralized VPN is that exact shape: a single pile of logs tying every user to everything they did, just waiting its turn.
So each breach pushes more people to realize the model itself is broken, and they start moving to decentralized privacy. That brings more traffic and real demand onto Anyone, rewards the operators running the relays, and funds a larger, stronger, more private network.
Every breach of the old world quietly builds the one replacing it. Anyone is for everyone.
2026 is officially the worst year for crypto hacks in history—and we still have two months left.
$8.7B stolen. 326 incidents. That's more than any previous full year combined. Here is what’s actually happening under the hood:
📈 Frequency is exploding
Historically, we saw 12–18 hacks/month. In 2026? We're averaging 32.6, peaking at 48 in August. Even million-dollar+ hacks have doubled (59 → 117).
💰 The sheer size is unprecedented
Feb 2025 (Bybit): $1.4B was the record.Oct 2026 (Binance): $6.4B just shattered it.We’ve had SEVEN $100M+ hacks this year, five in the last 100 days alone.
🎯 The attack surface has shifted
Smart contract bugs aren't the main vector anymore. The new weak links are people and infrastructure:
• Engineer's laptops (Binance)
• Hijacked RPC nodes (Kelp)
• Tricked multisig signers (Drift)
• Tampered hardware (Ledger, Coldcard)
Because Crypto is permissionless, it has become the ultimate live-fire testing ground for AI cyber warfare. The real question isn't whether we've reached the tipping point of these attacks. It's this: once AI finishes practicing on Web3, what happens when it turns its sights on real-world IT infrastructure? 🌍
Jonathan Green retweeted
Hypothetical: you give your agent 2 USDC and tell it to stay alive.
What does it buy first?
Jonathan Green retweeted
The next wave of demand hitting this network won’t be human at all, it’ll be machines, and Anyone is already built for it.
AI agents need private, programmatic egress and they can pay for it directly in $ANYONE with no app store, no account and no human anywhere in the loop. Running 24/7, whilst soaking up off-peak capacity that would otherwise sit idle ensures that every one of those payments deepens the anonymity set and makes everyone harder to single out.
This isn’t just theory, the plumbing is already being built in the open. The first piece of the TOON Protocol credentials package is live, the buyer’s half of the blind-signature system that lets someone pay for premium access and then prove that payment later without ever revealing who they are.
It blinds credential identifiers, unblinds the issuer’s signatures, and verifies them, all built on proven RSA blind-signature cryptography. That’s the exact mechanism that keeps payment and usage completely separate, shipping as real code right now.
Check out our public github here:
github.com/anyone-protocol/
Jonathan Green retweeted
Actors don’t sell tickets at the door.
Your app shouldn’t have to either. A TOON connector sits in front, checks that every request is paid, and lets it through.
Your app does the show. The connector works the box office.
Jonathan Green retweeted
Building on TOON, running a node, or just curious how ILP routes and x402 settles?
We’re in Discord, come say hi.
discord.gg/whPFHRTwBg
Jonathan Green retweeted
Slop attaches a budget to a repo. small projects use it to get eyes on their code, big ones use it as a filter, because it only pays on what a maintainer merges
had fun breaking it down with @ripchillpill and @R2D2zen
a tweet to a live product in hours. it's a golden era to build on robinhood
@mil_itia (@SlopCash) & @nftboi_ (@umia_finance)
CR2 ep 09 highlights w/ Chill PIll & R2D2
0:05 paid only for merges
1:20 anti-dump, anti-rug
2:30 futarchy explained
4:40 tweet to product in hours
She should be in prison
MeToo "pioneer" MIT scientist who drove a professor to the brink of su*cide with false r*pe allegations after he broke up with her, told him she wanted to feel like she was "gang r*ped."
Professor David Sabatini has been awarded $6M after his former colleague, Dr. Kristin Knouse, defamed him with completely false allegations.
The MeToo community praised Knouse when she came out with her allegations.
Sabatini's entire career was destroyed by the false allegations as his colleagues all rushed to defend the woman who lied about him.
He also tried taking his own life by hanging himself, according to the Daily Mail.
Newly released texts reveal that Knouse, 38, was the one who pursued Sabatini, 58, and it wasn't until he left her for another woman that she accused him of r*pe.
After the breakup, she texted a friend that he was going to get "Weinstein-ed out of science."
"My lawyers and I are out for blood... prison is what he should get," she said.
She praised how "hopelessly defeated, beyond the violence stage," he was after his career was ruined.
But text messages show that Knouse pursued him and sent him graphic texts.
"I can't wait to wake up tomorrow and feel like I've been gang r*ped," she said in one text message.
Knouse accused Sabatini of making her feel "scared" by his advances, but evidence showed that *she* aggressively pursued him.
When he decided to pursue a different scientist, Knouse ended his career with false accusations.
Sabatini's entire life was destroyed by the woke mob. They fired him from the Whitehead Institute and MIT, and erased his name from papers.
She purposely left key evidence and text messages out when handing over information to investigators that would have proved Sabatini was innocent.
She should never see the outside of a prison cell.
46