Krista Stephens (@ATweetThing) header
Krista Stephens (@ATweetThing) profile picture

My innominate voice echoing in air space as hundreds of millions of people talk at once. 🗣️ Words have the power to help, heal, harm, humiliate, & humble” 💙

Joined August 2011
Photo by Krista Stephens (@ATweetThing)Photo by Krista Stephens (@ATweetThing)Photo by Krista Stephens (@ATweetThing)Photo by Krista Stephens (@ATweetThing)Photo by Krista Stephens (@ATweetThing)Photo by Krista Stephens (@ATweetThing)Photo by Krista Stephens (@ATweetThing)Photo by Krista Stephens (@ATweetThing)Photo by Krista Stephens (@ATweetThing)Photo by Krista Stephens (@ATweetThing)
Always gentle, always kind, always loved. 🥰 Eternally in our heats… ♾️
1
1
18
8,813
Bernie has been right about everything all the time this whole damn time. Listen to @SenSanders
Instead of building more AI data centers, which 66% of Americans oppose, I have a better idea. Let’s build 7 million affordable homes & apartments. Let’s build more hospitals, schools & childcare centers. Let’s create an economy that works for all, not just the top 1 percent.
9
❌ WIDESPREAD VOTER FRAUD— FOUR QUESTIONS Election Claims Fact Check: chatgpt.com/s/t_6ae77c92e550… 🗳️ Bottom line The evidence supports three factual conclusions: Trump lost the certified 2020 election; isolated instances of illegal noncitizen voting have occurred, but are statistically insignificant; and verified audits and prosecutions have not established the alleged nationwide scale of tens or hundreds of thousands of illegal ballots. Fact-checked answers: Noncitizen voting in U.S. elections 🗳️ 1. In what year did the narrative become a persistent, multiyear national political issue? 🗳️ 2020, with an important historical distinction. Donald Trump publicly promoted claims of millions of illegal votes after the 2016 election. Following his 2020 defeat, allegations of widespread election fraud continued through subsequent election cycles, with noncitizen voting becoming an especially prominent recurring claim during the 2024 campaign. Therefore, 2016 marks the earlier national prominence; 2020 marks the post-election escalation; and 2024 marks another major resurgence. 🗳️ 2. Is Donald Trump’s 2020 presidential election loss an established, legally certified fact? 🗳️ Yes. Joe Biden 306 Electoral votes / Donald Trump 232 Electoral votes Certified results recorded by the National Archives. Biden also won the national popular vote by approximately 7.05 million votes. Biden’s victory was legally certified, and audits, recounts, and litigation did not establish fraud sufficient to overturn the result. 🗳️ 3. Does empirical evidence support widespread noncitizen voting involving tens or hundreds of thousands of ballots? 🗳️ No verified evidence establishes that claim. Actual state audit findings include: Investigation/Documented findings: Georgia, 2024 ▫️20 noncitizens registered; 9 had voted in previous elections Nevada, 2016 ▫️100 noncitizens registered; 3 voted Brennan Center, 2016 Approximately 30 suspected incidents among 23.5 million ballots examined These findings establish that noncitizen voting occurs, but do not establish a nationwide problem involving tens or hundreds of thousands of illegal ballots. 🗳️ 4. What is the exact nationwide conviction count over the past six years, and how does it compare with total ballots? 🗳️ An exact, comprehensive nationwide count for November 2020–November 2026 is not established by the available records. Two particularly useful documented findings are: 100 cases: The Heritage Foundation’s database included approximately 100 documented cases of noncitizen voting from 1982 through 2025, according to Brookings. These are not necessarily all convictions, and the database is not a complete nationwide census. 14 convictions or guilty pleas: ProPublica’s August 14, 2026 investigation identified 14 such outcomes in a particular federal enforcement initiative through May 2026. This is not the total across all federal and state jurisdictions over six years. For scale, approximately 424 million ballots were cast in the 2020 presidential, 2022 House, and 2024 general elections combined. Illustrative mathematical comparison: Hypothetical documented cases * 100 Cases per million ballots * 0.236 Percentage of ballots * 0.000024% 🗳️ Bottom line The evidence supports three factual conclusions: Trump lost the certified 2020 election; isolated instances of illegal noncitizen voting have occurred, but are statistically insignificant; and verified audits and prosecutions have not established the alleged nationwide scale of tens or hundreds of thousands of illegal ballots.
1
1
2
210
A narrative in search of evidence. Always. More ℹ️: teapaw.org/atweetthing/status/211… 🔎 for Voter Fraud
🤖 Made with AI
❌ WIDESPREAD VOTER FRAUD— FOUR QUESTIONS Election Claims Fact Check: chatgpt.com/s/t_6ae77c92e550… 🗳️ Bottom line The evidence supports three factual conclusions: Trump lost the certified 2020 election; isolated instances of illegal noncitizen voting have occurred, but are statistically insignificant; and verified audits and prosecutions have not established the alleged nationwide scale of tens or hundreds of thousands of illegal ballots. Fact-checked answers: Noncitizen voting in U.S. elections 🗳️ 1. In what year did the narrative become a persistent, multiyear national political issue? 🗳️ 2020, with an important historical distinction. Donald Trump publicly promoted claims of millions of illegal votes after the 2016 election. Following his 2020 defeat, allegations of widespread election fraud continued through subsequent election cycles, with noncitizen voting becoming an especially prominent recurring claim during the 2024 campaign. Therefore, 2016 marks the earlier national prominence; 2020 marks the post-election escalation; and 2024 marks another major resurgence. 🗳️ 2. Is Donald Trump’s 2020 presidential election loss an established, legally certified fact? 🗳️ Yes. Joe Biden 306 Electoral votes / Donald Trump 232 Electoral votes Certified results recorded by the National Archives. Biden also won the national popular vote by approximately 7.05 million votes. Biden’s victory was legally certified, and audits, recounts, and litigation did not establish fraud sufficient to overturn the result. 🗳️ 3. Does empirical evidence support widespread noncitizen voting involving tens or hundreds of thousands of ballots? 🗳️ No verified evidence establishes that claim. Actual state audit findings include: Investigation/Documented findings: Georgia, 2024 ▫️20 noncitizens registered; 9 had voted in previous elections Nevada, 2016 ▫️100 noncitizens registered; 3 voted Brennan Center, 2016 Approximately 30 suspected incidents among 23.5 million ballots examined These findings establish that noncitizen voting occurs, but do not establish a nationwide problem involving tens or hundreds of thousands of illegal ballots. 🗳️ 4. What is the exact nationwide conviction count over the past six years, and how does it compare with total ballots? 🗳️ An exact, comprehensive nationwide count for November 2020–November 2026 is not established by the available records. Two particularly useful documented findings are: 100 cases: The Heritage Foundation’s database included approximately 100 documented cases of noncitizen voting from 1982 through 2025, according to Brookings. These are not necessarily all convictions, and the database is not a complete nationwide census. 14 convictions or guilty pleas: ProPublica’s August 14, 2026 investigation identified 14 such outcomes in a particular federal enforcement initiative through May 2026. This is not the total across all federal and state jurisdictions over six years. For scale, approximately 424 million ballots were cast in the 2020 presidential, 2022 House, and 2024 general elections combined. Illustrative mathematical comparison: Hypothetical documented cases * 100 Cases per million ballots * 0.236 Percentage of ballots * 0.000024% 🗳️ Bottom line The evidence supports three factual conclusions: Trump lost the certified 2020 election; isolated instances of illegal noncitizen voting have occurred, but are statistically insignificant; and verified audits and prosecutions have not established the alleged nationwide scale of tens or hundreds of thousands of illegal ballots.
14
Replying to @USPSHelp
I paid $70.00 (2 packages) for TWO DAY delivery to two locations several hundred miles away — five days later and the packages traveled to the Indianapolis Hub 15 miles from my home—UNDELIVERED. 💵💵💵 REFUND PLEASE!!
1
8
.
Replying to @ItsDiamondJoe
Kellyanne — He’s hopped up on Adderall, terrorizes the nation with his demented bullshit for 12hours, burdens us with more corruption, insanity, and outrageous behavior —THEN he’s brought down by benzodiazepines so he can sleep for three hours before waking his fat, decrepit ass to torment us for another day. Manufactured energy. Insane bullshit. Donald Trump is a National Disgrace.
2
15
THE BOTTOM LINE: GREED. POWER. CONTROL. Musk is spending hundreds of millions of dollars in an electoral environment where government decisions can affect billions of dollars in corporate revenue, investment value, and tax benefits. The publicly documented money trail establishes the size of that financial interest. It does not, by itself, establish a quid pro quo or prove that any individual campaign contribution was exchanged for official action. If he loses congressional allies, the most consequential exposures are increased scrutiny, less favorable legislation, changes in appropriations, and reduced political access. If state leadership changes, his companies could also face different subsidy and tax policies. And that is precisely why scrutiny of large political contributions matters: the public has a legitimate interest in knowing whose businesses benefit from government decisions, who finances the officials making them, and whether those decisions serve the public interest.
3
29
Surface-to-air missiles have been installed at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago mansion. This is the kind of thing authoritarians have to do to protect themselves from the people they've wronged. telegraph.co.uk/us/news/2026…
1
2
23
No context.
🤖 Made with AI
24
🙇 The context The delivery Her velvety voice & aristocratic accent with unusual origins *see ℹ️ The eloquence, articulation, and art of communication 🗣️ ℹ️ Cate Blanchett sounds aristocratic because she speaks with an unusually refined, precise, and carefully articulated Australian accent that has strong similarities to upper-class British English. What's particularly interesting is that she isn't British at all. She was born in Melbourne, Australia, but her natural speaking voice has qualities that many people associate with British aristocracy. What makes her sound so aristocratic? 1. Her cultivated Australian accent. Blanchett speaks a polished form of Australian English, with relatively few of the broad vowel sounds commonly associated with stereotypical Australian speech. It can sound remarkably close to British Received Pronunciation (RP), historically associated with Britain's educated upper classes. 2. Her extraordinary diction. She pronounces consonants distinctly, controls her vowels, and rarely slurs or runs words together. This gives her speech an almost theatrical elegance. 3. Her measured rhythm and intonation. She often speaks deliberately, using carefully placed pauses, changes in pitch, and emphasis. The result can sound commanding, sophisticated, and occasionally imperious. 4. Her theatrical training. Blanchett graduated from Australia's National Institute of Dramatic Art (NIDA). Classical theatrical training emphasizes breath control, vocal projection, articulation, and the ability to adopt different accents and social registers. 5. Her screen roles reinforce the impression. She's frequently portrayed royalty, aristocrats, and powerful women, including Elizabeth I. Audiences naturally associate her distinctive vocal delivery with those characters. There's also an interesting linguistic explanation Linguists distinguish between Broad, General, and Cultivated Australian English. Blanchett is frequently cited as an example of Cultivated Australian English, the variety most closely resembling British RP. Blanchett herself has acknowledged that her accent changes depending on her surroundings. She says she sounds noticeably more Australian when she's back home with family. What I find particularly distinctive is that she doesn't simply sound upper-class; she sounds authoritative. Her low, resonant voice, controlled pacing, and crisp articulation create an impression of intelligence, confidence, and social command. Interestingly, those are qualities we culturally associate with aristocracy, even though an accent alone tells us very little about someone's actual social background. If I could ask for any retroactive personal gift from God, it would be: The gift of verbal articulation in communication.
A beautiful speech about the challenge—and necessity—of communicating in pursuit of connection from Cate Blanchett, one of this year's Praemium Imperiale laureates.
1
223
.
Well that was one hell of a closing argument tour by Trump on behalf of candidates. He salivated over men’s body parts, said high gas prices are good because oil companies are making billions, bragged about his ballroom, and said if he gave people $5k they still couldn’t afford to buy dinner at his club.
21
Krista Stephens retweeted
Well that was one hell of a closing argument tour by Trump on behalf of candidates. He salivated over men’s body parts, said high gas prices are good because oil companies are making billions, bragged about his ballroom, and said if he gave people $5k they still couldn’t afford to buy dinner at his club.
148
2,139
50
8,485
108,455
Krista Stephens retweeted
72
1,464
62
3,479
38,226
.
Donald Trump is on the ballot November 3rd.
1
22
Vote like we have a fascist for a president.
38
132
5
647
4,183
A truly wonderful moment for my mother, Marie. ⚾️ A lifelong cheerleader for the @Brewers 🏆
A MOMENT THAT WILL LIVE IN BASEBALL IMMORTALITY
66