I oppose both communism and fascism. Can you say the same?
Joined November 2008
- Tweets121K
- Following2.9K
- Followers1.5K
- Likes77.9K
J. Austin Graham 🇺🇸 retweeted
This is genuinely how anti-ai degenerates are, and I'm not even kidding.
J. Austin Graham 🇺🇸 retweeted
This image will forever go down in the history books as the day that Lt. Gov Dan Patrick set into motion a chain of events that would eventually lead to his downfall and cost him the most powerful seat in the state
And it all started by throwing a bag of our Cereal Bites 😂🍃👋
J. Austin Graham 🇺🇸 retweeted
If you want to understand Christianity, learn from Christians.
If you want to understand Islam, learn from Muslims.
If you want to understand atheism, learn from atheists.
Listen to their critics too, of course. But you wouldn't rely on critics alone.
So why would you learn about AI exclusively from people who are anti-AI?
J. Austin Graham 🇺🇸 retweeted
Joe Rogan on the alcohol lobby and Dan Patrick banning cannabis in Texas:
“The Texas thing is all about alcohol. It's all about alcohol. It's traceable money to Dan Patrick.”
“Because marijuana is relatively inexpensive. If you go out drinking with some buddies, you have $500-600 tab at the end of the night.
In California where you can legally buy [cannabis] - $15 to $20 and you’re barbecued for the whole night. Especially California cannabis.”
J. Austin Graham 🇺🇸 retweeted
🎨✨ SHARE YOUR ART!
Drop your favorite AI creation in the replies! 👇
Check out other artists, show some love ❤️, and repost 🔁 to help more creators connect!
Let's keep growing this amazing AI art community! 🌌
#ShareYourArt #AIArtCommunity #AIArtists
J. Austin Graham 🇺🇸 retweeted
🚨 Trans Woman GOES IN on BioWare! Yes, LGBTQ gamers also wanted BioWare shuttered. This isn't just a "chud" thing.
She said EVERYTHING gamers have been thinking about Dragon Age: The Veilguard.
But her most powerful criticism was how BioWare's approach to representation can actually make life WORSE for the LGBTQ community.
She describes the writing as “ham-fisted,” immature, and damaging to the very people it's supposed to represent.
She argues that constantly forcing these conversations into entertainment makes the public sick of it, creates resentment toward LGBTQ people, and ultimately hurts trans people themselves.
She even brings up Trump winning the election, connecting it to what she sees as a much larger cultural backlash against this kind of activism.
And that's what makes her perspective so interesting. She's warning that poorly executed representation can do more harm than good.
She also calls out:
• The hypocrisy of preaching inclusivity while excluding women with naturally large breasts from character creation.
• Forcing modern terms like “non-binary” and “trans” into a fantasy universe that already established its own terminology.
• How a genuinely well-written trans character could do MORE for LGBTQ acceptance than childish, preachy dialogue ever could.
Representation was never the problem. Bad writing was.
Dismissing everyone who criticized Veilguard as a “chud” completely ignores LGBTQ gamers who were criticizing the exact same things.
What do you think?
#SaveMassEffect #SaveMassEffectNotBioWare #SaveDragonAge
J. Austin Graham 🇺🇸 retweeted
They finally came out with a comprehensive test for TDS! There is hope for a cure!
#TDS #politicalcomedy
J. Austin Graham 🇺🇸 retweeted
A lot of people don’t actually hate AI-generated content.
They hate that the barrier separating them from everyone else is disappearing.
When creating software required years of training, being a programmer gave you status.
When producing beautiful images required years of practice, being an artist gave you status.
Now someone with no formal training can produce things that previously required entire teams.
And suddenly we’re having a moral crisis about who deserves to create.
The real controversy isn’t that AI makes creation easier.
It’s that millions of people are losing their monopoly on being considered talented.
J. Austin Graham 🇺🇸 retweeted
My biggest concern is that if there is a clean sweep by Democrats of the House, Senate and Presidency in 2028, they will:
1. Make DC and Puerto Rico states to gain a strong majority in the Senate.
2. Open the borders and legalize everyone living in America illegally to cement a permanent majority.
3. Increase the size of the Supreme Court to gain an immediate majority.
This would result in America becoming a permanent one-party state and the end of democracy in any meaningful sense of the word.
All that is needed to ensure this doesn’t happen is 51 Republican senators in 2029. That is why you should vote for Republican senators this election. Other reasons are irrelevant compared to this one.
J. Austin Graham 🇺🇸 retweeted
This is what AI is made for. Murtaugh is too old for this 💩 and Riggs has to find a new partner. I absolutely love how they brought in every character from that era and even combined two different characters for one actor in a couple different scenes. 🤣🤣🤣💥🔫
J. Austin Graham 🇺🇸 retweeted
When @realDonaldTrump was elected for his first term, innumerable people including most of my academic colleagues said that the worst realities would befall the United States. None of those things happened. They then said that he would wait until his second term to end democracy, institute martial law, etc. None of those things have happened. Is there a SINGLE honest individual amongst those people who is willing to admit that they were grossly incorrect and hence irrationally unhinged?
J. Austin Graham 🇺🇸 retweeted
HISTORY LESSON ON YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY CARD:
Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn’t know this. It’s easy to check out, if you don’t believe it. Be sure and show it to your family and friends. They need a little history lesson on what’s what and it doesn’t matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are FACTS.
Up until the 1980's, Social Security cards expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes.
Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" message was removed.
Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. His promises are in black, with updates in brackets.
1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary [No longer voluntary],
2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program [Now 7.65% on the first $90,000, and 15% on the first $90,000 if you’re self-employed],
3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year [No longer tax deductible],
4.) That the money the participants put into the independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program [Under Johnson the money was moved to the General Fund and spent], and
5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income [Under Clinton & Gore up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed].
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month — and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘put away’ — you may be interested in the following:
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US
AND MY FAVORITE:
Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?
A: That’s right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!
Now, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!
And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it! If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, though. Some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn’t so.
J. Austin Graham 🇺🇸 retweeted
I'm half-Japanese. I'm a female.
Because of our obsession with voting demographics, many would say I must be a Democrat.
And for a period of my life, I fell for that trap.
But what the hell have Democratic policies ever done for me?
The default argument always goes to abortion. But frankly, I think there are a lot more important things in life than abortion.
And it's kind of insulting that Democrats think that is my number one issue because I happen to be female. That I only care about the 'right' to terminate life which happens to be developing in my womb.
Honestly, I'll just practice protective sex and be responsible.
"bUt wHaT aBoUt RaPe KhAylEe!!!!!"
Let's talk about that.
As someone who actually was raped, I have some thoughts on that. Number one, what's more important to a woman? That she can get an abortion after she's raped, or that she was raped in the first place?
I told my story on here a couple of weeks ago. I won't rehash it. But suffice it to say, I'm going with the latter.
So, I'm going to support a political platform that is tough on crime. Policies that don't support a revolving door in prisons and jails, including many who commit those rapes in the first place!
And as to abortions for rape victims? Honestly though, that's a misdirection. Democrats don't want limited abortions for rape or incest victims. Or in situations to save the life of the mother. They want free-for-all abortions! All the way up to birth, as Massachusetts now allows.
The rape argument is essentially a red herring. Because if Democrats really did care about rape victims, they'd do something about the fucking rapists!
So, go wear your Handmaid's Tale outfits and fuck off with the abortion argument.
Now, what else do Democrats offer?
Free education? Free healthcare? Free housing?
What the hell is their definition of free? Someone has to pay it.
We tried this with Obamacare. Prices for healthcare continued to rise. And insurers and healthcare providers took advantage of subsidized insurance to charge even more for policies and services.
Education is practically already treated as free! Students take out insane student loans and then just keep them in forbearance or let them default. Meanwhile, the taxpayers picked up the tabbed for billions which went to liberal institutions to indoctrinate a new generation of "communications" majors and "African literaure" scholars to land "diversity officer" c-suite jobs.
We should be rethinking what kind of education will help young people succeed in the 21st century. The current structure is kind of broken. And thanks in large part also to the teachers' unions, which are just radical Leftist organizations and care nothing about education.
Finally, housing would be cheaper if we stopped importing the third world. Trump is trying to do that. Democrats just want more in to increase their voting base.
So, again, I ask, what the hell do Democrats offer me?
Other than wanting me out of my job, in prison, or dead, because I happen to support the Admin's agenda.
If they win in November, they're just going to spend the next two years trying to prosecute everyone that's trying to make the country a better, safer place to live.
Fuck Democrats. Fuck the Left.
That's why I voted Red. Thanks.
J. Austin Graham 🇺🇸 retweeted
You absolute midwit. Congrats on repeating the Wikipedia "Nazis were far-right, end of story" summary you absorbed between TikToks.
Yes, the Nazis crushed independent unions, jailed and murdered communists and social democrats, and Hitler liquidated the Strasserite "left" wing of his own party in the Night of the Long Knives. That part is not in dispute. They were not Marxist class-struggle socialists. They hated Bolshevism as a Jewish plot and treated international socialism as the main enemy. Fine.
What your middle-school history class skipped is that they still ran a National *Socialist* state: private property existed only as long as it served the Führer’s racial and war goals, wages and prices were controlled, industry was cartelized under state direction, profit was subordinated to the party, and the economy was planned for autarky and rearmament. That is not free-market capitalism, liberal conservatism, or classical right-wing economics. It is the same family of state-directed, anti-liberal, collectivist economics practiced by every other fascist and "national socialist" regime. The name was not a prank; the 25-point program and the early rhetoric were full of anti-capitalist planks precisely because they were competing with the actual socialists for working-class support.
Your North Korea comparison is the usual gotcha and it is only half-clever. Yes, names can lie. But the NSDAP did not merely call itself socialist while secretly running a Rothschild hedge fund. They nationalized, directed, rationed, and regimented. The difference from Soviet socialism was mainly that the Nazis kept the owners as managers under party orders instead of shooting them all and installing commissars. Both systems produced shortages, secret police, and mass graves; one just had better uniforms and Wagner.
Elon pointing out the obvious—that "National Socialist" is not an ironic branding exercise and that the regime was economically left of any classical liberal or conservative—does not make him a moron. It makes him less obedient to the post-1945 academic consensus that insists every totalitarian who isn’t a full Marxist must be filed under "far-right" so the left never has to share the body count. Money didn’t buy him a brain; it just bought him a platform where he doesn’t have to pretend your selective reading of 1930s Germany is the complete picture.
Keep yelling "far-right fascists" while ignoring the actual economic policies and the party’s own name. It is the historical equivalent of covering your ears and shouting.