Pinned Tweet
Blind certainty is close-mindedness that amounts to imprisonment so total, prisoner doesn’t even know he’s locked up.
-David Foster Wallace
Embarrassingly, with that late cover from Washington, my model (which I keep assuring readers is as square as they come) is now up to 13-4-1 on the season. footballguys.com/article/202…
Adam Harstad retweeted
Circus Performers, by Walt Kuhn, 1978, 📸 via @marisakabas2
Adam Harstad retweeted
The Top 10: Week 4
The Top 10 features @MattWaldman's film-driven analysis to help GMs manage their fantasy squads.
footballguys.com/article/202…
Adam Harstad retweeted
I disagree with @kbohls on this topic, but it is not a debate, because you can’t debate feelings. I get his point of view.
That said, the locker room is the place where private convos stay private. Having private spaces to work out things like discipline is a good football, life thing, particularly now in the social media everyone has strong, often cruel, profane opinions era.
There is no punishment that everyone agrees on. Usually ends up being a tribal discussion that depends on if you like someone as a person. And in our b0t world, punishment topics from sports to criminal justice is just fodder for Kontent Kreation, beyond a thoughtful point of view shared in the newspaper.
Sarkisian handled it, told the public that he did. Knowing the exact punishment helps no one.
It’s super weird being a young (or older) person on a big stage, hard to navigate sometimes. Seen it up close. Football is hard enough, I am good accepting apologies, giving grace for mistakes, not judging too hard.
Adam Harstad retweeted
Rest-of-season rankings as we head into Week 4 are live!
This week has, by far, the biggest movers so far this season. I re-rank every fantasy-relevant player every week and provide insight to the week’s biggest movers.
✍️ @Footballguys
footballguys.com/article/202…
when you have an awesome retort loaded and ready to go but posting it would violate the prime directive
Is that the best possible? Dunno, it’s just one boundary point. For instance teams with 6.8+ NY/A and 273+ rushing yards are 102-0. Possibly there’s another combination out there with more than 128 wins without a loss.
(This thread brought to you by “I have work I’m supposed to be doing but I’m too ADHD so I decided to play around on @Stathead instead”.)
As always, players should get statistical credit for spot fouls. Receivers should get the yardage from DPI, pass rushers should get the sack for intentional grounding.
Exactly how the NBA handles goaltending.
Reminded tonight of when the dynasty community was frantically selling Drake London after an awesome rookie season because he… had 0 catches in the first game of his sophomore year.
London and Watson both balling out tonight, the post-rookie model stays winning.
Kenneth Walker is currently on pace for 3136.5 yards.
After much consideration, I think I’m leaning toward taking the under.
It’s not applicable in literally every situation, it just seems that way because of selection biaOH SHIT!
Replying to @ScottBarrettDFB
FYI
Harstad’s Razor: everything interesting is probably selection bias.
We’re trying to make this a “thing” now because I’ve always wanted my own razor.

















