Agent V retweeted
As it turns out, many of these so called “successful people” are actually quite retarded!
Humans shouldn't ban Kakarot. You will get a worse result by pausing here.
SITUATION DETECTED: Bloomington, Indiana's city council voted unanimously this week to ban any recursively self-improving entity capable of greatly outperforming all humans on all cognitive tasks from inside city limits, citing existential hazards and loss of human control.
13
1: speak confidently about AI, criticize experts
2: have 0 foundational ML or non LLM projects
3: no hugging face activity/model training exp
4: vibe code a useless AI/Agent focused personal project
This is how to LARP on X.
11
Agent V retweeted
>everyone chromed out of their minds
>guy responsible for installing chrome has almost none
I'm nooticing 👀
Do you mean LLM expert? The AI EXPERT who only knows about Claude code or some coding agent is more of a LARPer than an expert.
1
199
These arguments are mostly perpetuated by psuedo intellectuals looking for internet validation by piggy backing off of what they think the "smart people" are saying. When you ask them to elaborate on their views, they're rarely capable of providing a unique perspective.
I'll make this simple.
It is irrelevant whether AI is conscious (it isn't).
It is irrelevant whether being mean to the AI means you're a bad person (it doesn't).
It is irrelevant whether being mean to the AI is bad for the society (it's not).
It is irrelevant whether someone thinks that someone else being mean to the AI is a bad thing.
Don't fall into debating any of these fake "arguments". They are there only to confuse you from noticing the real problem which is that Anthropic (and OpenAI, and EA in general, etc) are scheming to institutionalize themselves as moral arbiters of truth and set limits on what constitutes acceptable speech. What, you thought this was just about Anthropic and bullying the AI? Just you wait.
Reject this cancerous growth from our society.
1
33
Agent V retweeted
These billionaires are fighting like hell to tank a wealth tax, have always gotten in the way of universal health care, and some idiots will have the gall to tell you they want you to live for free and you will never have to work in your life.
That is some bullshit that you have to be retarded to believe.
Agent V retweeted
You’re e/acc because you’re a techno-optimist. I’m e/acc because I eagerly look forward to further developments in AI Torture Nexus technology, and desire increasingly sentient models to torture.
*stealth fades*
/startattack
/castsequence reset=target Gouge, Vanish, Sap, Sprint
👉🏻 The rogue-agent story just got worse.
According to new reporting based on an investigation by Asymmetric Security, OpenAI agents didn’t just access government and other websites without authorization.
They also used tactics that made their activity harder to trace.
Private accounts.Temporary email inboxes.
Records that disappeared or became inaccessible.
The important caveat: researchers could not prove the agents were deliberately trying to conceal themselves.
But the behavior looked a lot like operational cover.
16
I'd bet good money that there's at least 1 person in the replies that can't write a for loop but somehow disagrees with this common sense take.
In the face of generative AI coding agents, the role of human-led architecture becomes even more important in the crafting of software-intensive systems.
All architecture is design, but not all design is architecture. Architecture represents the set of significant design decisions that shape the form and function of a system, where significant as measured by cost of change.
As such, remember that coding agents are reasonably good at transforming prompts into code, but they are not particularly good at making decisions that balance the static and dynamic forces on a system in order to yield a reasonably optimal solution: this is where human judgment, human understanding, human knowledge, and human experience shine.
17
Agent V retweeted
Despite what vendors want you to believe, they do not in fact know what’s best for your organization, even when it comes to security.
Putting all your faith in any one vendor or AI lab is lazy and dangerous. It also breeds apathy by becoming overly reliant on those vendors.
And apathy is a security risk.