Pinned Tweet
A wallet address doesn’t tell you the whole financial story.
Someone might have a consistent income, years of repayment history and a strong financial track record, but none of that is necessarily visible onchain.
Yet DeFi lending still has to make decisions with limited information.
This is one of the problems @primus_labs is exploring with zkTLS.
The idea is to let users generate verifiable proofs from their web data without handing over all the underlying information.
Imagine applying for a DeFi loan and proving that you meet certain income or repayment criteria without exposing your full bank records or personal data.
The platform verifies the proof, applies its risk model and makes a lending decision based on the required information.
That’s a potentially useful bridge between Web2 financial data and Web3 applications.
But there’s an important distinction: proving that information is authentic doesn’t automatically make someone creditworthy.
Data sources, freshness, risk models and collateral still matter.
zkTLS could improve what lenders know about borrowers. Whether that translates into better lending decisions is the bigger question.
That’s the part I’ll be watching with @primus_labs.
🤝 Paid partnership
Before you use @primus_labs, there’s a question worth asking:
Does Primus solve a real privacy problem, or is the market getting ahead of the technology?
Primus has raised $6.5M from investors including VanEck, Samsung Next, Alchemy and others. That’s a strong lineup, but funding validates investor interest, not product-market fit.
And this is where things get interesting.
Primus is building around zkTLS, a way to verify data from existing web services without relying entirely on screenshots, manual disclosures or custom integrations. Combined with zero-knowledge proofs and a zkVM, the goal is to let applications verify specific facts without exposing all the underlying information.
Imagine proving that your account holds more than $1M without revealing the exact balance.
Or an institution demonstrating that its reserves meet a required threshold without publishing every account-level detail.
That’s a meaningful use case. But there’s a difference between proving one fact privately and making an entire financial activity private.
1. What does Primus actually protect?
In its Data Verification and Computation (DVC) architecture, Primus uses zkTLS to authenticate off-chain data, while a zkVM executes the relevant business logic and produces a verifiable result. The workflow also uses a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) for parts of the verification and computation process.
This can reduce the amount of sensitive information that needs to be disclosed.
But privacy isn’t a single switch you turn on.
Depending on the application, transaction timing, public wallet interactions, gas usage and relationships between addresses may still reveal useful information. Even if a balance remains confidential, observable activity can sometimes expose behavioral patterns.
Hiding the amount doesn’t automatically hide the activity.
The real test is how much information an adversary can infer from everything that remains visible.
2. Where does the trust actually sit?
Cryptographic proofs can verify that certain data and computations meet specified conditions. They don’t automatically eliminate every trust assumption in the system.
Primus uses an attestation network, and its architecture includes TEE-based components. That means the security model depends on more than the proof alone.
How are attestors selected and coordinated? What prevents collusion? What guarantees does the hardware provide? How are failures handled? And how decentralized is the system in production?
These aren’t reasons to dismiss the technology. They’re the questions that separate a compelling cryptographic design from a system institutions can confidently depend on.
Calling something trustless doesn’t make those questions disappear.
3. The real test is adoption, not the narrative.
Institutional Proof of Reserves is one of the clearest use cases to watch.
If Primus can deliver reliable verification, meaningful confidentiality and a practical integration process, institutions have a concrete reason to use it.
I’d watch for recurring production usage, independently verifiable deployments, measurable demand and evidence that customers are willing to pay for the service.
XP campaigns, leaderboard activity and airdrop speculation can bring attention, but they aren’t substitutes for product demand.
My thesis is simple:
Primus is working on a problem worth solving. Whether its approach becomes essential infrastructure depends on its security assumptions, the privacy it delivers in practice and the customers it can attract.
Don’t confuse a promising technology with a proven business.
Join the community: s.kaito.ai/JOHVxzr
#PrimusLabs #zkTLS #DeFi
𝗔𝗟𝗜 retweeted
Over +10k applications in less than 24 hours.
Still haven't applied?
👇👇👇👇
Applications for the Barn Sale are now open.
1,000 Founding Barns.
Apply on:
mountain.cashmere.exchange
1/2
𝗔𝗟𝗜 retweeted
📚 کریپتو از صفر | قسمت ۱۹
💵 استیبلکوین چیست؟ (Stablecoin)
یکی از مهمترین مفاهیم در دنیای کریپتو، استیبلکوینها هستن.
اما استیبلکوین دقیقاً چیه و چرا به وجود اومده؟
🔹 استیبلکوین چیست؟
استیبلکوین نوعی رمزارزه که طراحی شده تا ارزشش نسبت به یک دارایی مرجع، مثل دلار آمریکا یا طلا، تا حد امکان ثابت بمونه.
مثلاً هر واحد USDT یا USDC معمولاً معادل ۱ دلار آمریکاست.
برخلاف بیتکوین و اتریوم که قیمتشون دائماً تغییر میکنه، هدف استیبلکوینها حفظ ثبات قیمته.
🔹 انواع استیبلکوینها
استیبلکوینها از نظر روش حفظ ارزش به چند دسته تقسیم میشن:
1️⃣ با پشتوانه ارزهای فیات (Fiat-backed)
این نوع استیبلکوینها با داراییهایی مثل پول نقد، سپرده بانکی و اوراق بهادار کمریسک پشتیبانی میشن.
مثال:
USDT و USDC
2️⃣ با پشتوانه کالا (Commodity-backed)
ارزش این نوع استیبلکوینها به داراییهایی مثل طلا وابسته است.
مثال:
PAXG (توکن با پشتوانه طلا)
3️⃣ با پشتوانه رمزارز (Crypto-backed)
در این مدل، از رمزارزهای دیگه بهعنوان وثیقه استفاده میشه تا ارزش استیبلکوین حفظ بشه.
مثال:
DAI
4️⃣ الگوریتمی (Algorithmic)
این نوع تلاش میکنه با استفاده از الگوریتمها و سازوکارهای عرضه و تقاضا، قیمت رو ثابت نگه داره.
نمونه معروف شکستخورده:
UST که در سال ۲۰۲۲ برابری خودش با دلار رو از دست داد.
🔹 استیبلکوینها چه کاربردی دارن؟
▪️ انتقال ارزش در شبکههای بلاکچینی
▪️ معامله در صرافیهای متمرکز و غیرمتمرکز
▪️ حفظ ارزش دارایی در برابر نوسانات بازار کریپتو
▪️ استفاده در پروژههای DeFi و وامدهی
▪️ انتقال پول بین کشورها
🔹 تتر (USDT) و تمرکزگرایی؛ نکتهای که باید بدانیم!
تتر یکی از پرکاربردترین استیبلکوینهای دنیاست که توسط شرکت Tether صادر میشه.
اما یک نکته مهم درباره تتر وجود داره که خیلی از کاربران از اون اطلاع ندارن:
شرکت Tether این قابلیت رو داره که بعضی آدرسهای کیف پول رو در قرارداد هوشمند USDT مسدود کنه (Blacklist).
یعنی چی؟
فرض کنید شما مقداری تتر در کیف پول شخصی خودتون، مثلاً Trust Wallet، MetaMask یا Rabby دارید.
اگر شرکت Tether به دلایلی مثل فعالیت مشکوک، ارتباط با آدرسهای مرتبط با جرائم مالی یا درخواست قانونی نهادهای نظارتی، آدرس شما رو مسدود کنه، دیگه نمیتونید تترهای موجود در اون آدرس رو منتقل کنید.
⚠️ اما یک سوءتفاهم مهم رو همینجا برطرف کنیم:
این Trust Wallet یا MetaMask یا Rabby نیست که پول شما رو قفل میکنه!
این کیف پولها فقط ابزار دسترسی و مدیریت داراییهای شما هستن.
این شرکت Tether، یعنی صادرکننده تتر، هست که میتونه آدرس شما رو در قرارداد هوشمند USDT مسدود کنه.
بنابراین حتی اگر کلید خصوصی کیف پولتون رو در اختیار داشته باشید، در صورت مسدود شدن آدرس توسط تتر، امکان انتقال USDT از اون آدرس رو نخواهید داشت.
این موضوع فقط به هک و سرقت محدود نمیشه. سیاستهای تحریمی هم میتونن باعث مسدود شدن بعضی آدرسها بشن.
برای مثال، آدرسهایی که با اشخاص یا نهادهای تحریمشده ارتباط دارن ممکنه مشمول این محدودیت بشن.
البته صرفاً استفاده از یک صرافی ایرانی به معنی مسدود شدن قطعی آدرس شما نیست؛ موضوع به شرایط، ارتباطات شناساییشده و تصمیم شرکت صادرکننده بستگی داره.
🔹 یک مثال واقعی: هک بایننس در اکتبر ۲۰۲۶
در حمله امنیتی ۲۹ اکتبر ۲۰۲۶ به بایننس، شرکتهای صادرکننده استیبلکوین وارد عمل شدن.
شرکت Tether بیش از ۱.۵ میلیارد دلار USDT و شرکت Circle بیش از ۸۰۰ میلیون دلار USDC مرتبط با این حادثه رو مسدود کردن.
این اتفاق نشون داد که صادرکنندگان استیبلکوین حتی میتونن داراییهایی رو که از صرافی خارج شدن و به کیف پول مهاجم منتقل شدن، در سطح قرارداد هوشمند مسدود کنن.
🔹 یک نکته جالب درباره تتر روی شبکه BNB Chain
شاید براتون جالب باشه که بدونید تتر رایجی که سالهاست روی شبکه BNB Smart Chain (BEP20) استفاده میکنیم، در نسخه معروف Binance-Peg، مستقیماً توسط شرکت Tether صادر نشده.
این نسخه توسط بایننس ایجاد شده و در برابر داراییهای پشتوانهای که بایننس نگهداری میکنه، عرضه شده.
به همین دلیل، سازوکار مسدودسازی شرکت Tether مستقیماً روی قرارداد این نسخه اعمال نمیشه؛ چون کنترل مستقیم قرارداد Binance-Peg در اختیار Tether نیست.
البته این به معنی غیرقابلمسدود بودن مطلق اون نیست و بایننس همچنان میتونه در محدوده اختیارات خودش روی این توکن و پشتوانه اون اقدام کنه.
📌 پس هنگام انتقال تتر، فقط به اسم USDT اکتفا نکنید؛ شبکه و آدرس قرارداد هوشمند (Contract Address) رو هم بررسی کنید.
still here. locked in. forever growing.
CT - my corner of the internet.
get yours: s.kaito.ai/T0oUIGo
𝗔𝗟𝗜 retweeted
🚨🚨🚨 هشدار امنیتی برای دارندگان والت Keplr
گزارشهایی از تراکنشهای غیرمجاز روی بعضی از حسابهای Keplr که با ورود گوگل یا اپل ساخته شدن، دریافت کردیم. موضوع رو به تیم Web3Auth گزارش دادیم و از همون موقع در حال بررسی هستیم.
بر اساس بررسی اولیه:
✅اگر کیف پول Keplr رو با **عبارت بازیابی (Seed Phrase)** یا **کیف پول سختافزاری** ساختی، حسابت تحت تأثیر این موضوع نیست.
اما اگر حسابت رو با **ورود گوگل یا اپل** ساختی، ممکنه تحت تأثیر قرار گرفته باشه. تا زمان اتمام بررسی:
- هیچ وجه جدیدی به این حساب واریز نکن.
- حساب رو جایی دوباره وارد (Import) یا بازسازی نکن.
- ورود با گوگل و اپل موقتاً غیرفعال شده.
- فقط به اطلاعیههای رسمی همین اکانت اعتماد کن و به هیچ DM یا لینک «بازیابی» اعتماد نکن.
به محض اینکه جزئیات تأییدشده و مراحل بعدی مشخص بشه، همینجا اطلاعرسانی میکنیم.
I think @sight_hood is aiming for something bigger than another UP/DOWN prediction platform.
The part that caught my attention is the expansion into AMM markets for NFTs and stocks.
That’s a different direction from simply betting on short-term price movements. It suggests SightHood wants to build a broader trading environment where users can interact with different types of markets.
There’s also the plan to use $SGT as the gas token for SightEVM, which adds an infrastructure layer to the bigger picture.
But having more features doesn’t automatically make a platform better.
Execution matters more than the roadmap. Users need a smooth experience, transparent markets and, most importantly, enough real demand to keep those markets active.
The vision looks interesting on paper. Now I’m more curious about how it performs once people actually start using it.
🤝 Paid partnership
Everyone blames sniper bots for unfair token launches.
But the numbers shared by @zerufinance point to a much bigger problem.
According to Bitquery data across 8.2M Pump.fun launches:
→ 21% had developer-linked wallets buying in the launch block.
→ Those wallets held a median of 10% of the token supply.
→ Developers and bundled wallets made at least $579M after fees from tokens they sold.
→ Sniper bots made $31.5M.
That’s an 18x difference.
So maybe speed was never the biggest advantage.
Access to supply, wallet coordination and the ability to exit at the right time mattered much more.
This is the problem Zeru’s Activity Markets are trying to approach from a different direction.
Instead of rewarding whoever gets in first, verified onchain activity can earn users miner and creator rights, while traders determine market value.
If you’re exploring it, connect the wallets you actually trade with and check your starting Zaps.
A different entry model is worth watching.
🤝 Paid partnership
Congrats to all 70 winners! 🎉
Nothing beats seeing rewards land directly in your Solana wallet.
That's a wrap on the @agentdojo campaign!
rarelist.io/projects/agent-d…
70 winners just got paid to their Solana wallets.
Excited for what's coming next! All upcoming campaigns will launch with our upgraded scoring algorithms.
Swapping tokens is one thing. Letting an AI agent trade on prediction markets is a whole different level of autonomy.
With @meetmotes exploring a potential Polymarket integration, I'm curious how much control users will have over their agents.
Personally, I'd prefer customizable limits with approval required for high-risk trades.
Would you trust your Motes agent to trade independently or approve every move?
Financial markets are moving onchain.
Motes is building an NFT-native AI Agent infrastructure on @RobinhoodApp, designed to connect autonomous execution with tokenized stocks and DeFi markets.
20,000 Genesis NFTs. Each connected to its own AI Agent.
Built for the next generation of onchain finance.
Put my name down for @torpornet. Fully reclined until something better happens. This is the lifestyle. teapaw.org/torpornet/status/21051…
اگه Genesis NFT پروژه @kalosfun رو مینت کردین اسپات GTD برای مینت داده برین چک کنین
اگه NFT شون روی تستنت رو هم دارین اسپات FCFS دارین
The Shift snapshot is complete.
The mint checker is live:
shiftforever.xyz/checker
Enter your wallet address to see your allocation and download your mint card.
@kalosfun Genesis NFT Holders:
we left a little surprise for you.
Check the wallet you used to reserve yours.
Applications for Cashmere Labs’ Barn Sale are officially open — 1,000 Founding Barns available.
GTD: 0.125 ETH
WL FCFS: 0.25 ETH
Public Dutch auction: starts at 1.5 ETH → clears at 0.25 ETH
Applications for the Barn Sale are now open.
1,000 Founding Barns.
Apply on:
mountain.cashmere.exchange
1/2
Applied for a Barn in the Mountain Barn Raising.
Apply with my link: mountain.cashmere.exchange/r…
@cashmerelabs reviews every entry and picks the lists.
Just applied for a Founding Barn on Mountain by @cashmerelabs. 🏔️
The project is introducing 1,000 soulbound Barns that earn $CSM through continuous Forage issuance on the island.
But there's more to explore than just the Barns: auctions, goats, and an autonomous monetary system are all part of the bigger picture.
Curious to see how this ecosystem develops and what role the Founding Barns will play in it.
Applications are open:
mountain.cashmere.exchange
🤝 Paid partnership
𝗔𝗟𝗜 retweeted
Applications for the Barn Sale are now open.
1,000 Founding Barns.
Apply on:
mountain.cashmere.exchange
1/2
The easiest way to farm a creator campaign is to post more.
The harder part is actually having something worth saying.
That’s the distinction @rarelistio seems to be pushing with its new content scoring system.
Looking through scored mentions, the pattern is becoming clearer: original takes, proper research and genuine effort matter more than simply filling the timeline with posts.
And with the next wave of campaigns moving to this updated system, the way creators approach content might need to change too.
I don’t think anyone benefits from another feed full of copy-pasted project descriptions.
Good research takes time. Having an actual opinion takes effort.
If Rarelist can consistently recognize that difference, it could make creator campaigns a lot more valuable for both projects and contributors.
The game isn’t just about posting anymore. It’s about bringing something to the conversation.
🤝 Paid partnership