Alright Lets Go retweeted
The Most Tolerant Woman in America 🇺🇸
She's an entire liberal comment section.
Alright Lets Go retweeted
WOW: Political ad GENIUS
“We’re just people experiencing voting Republican”
This is how you bridge the gap.
This is how you reach people’s hearts.
Alright Lets Go retweeted
Stay tuned, bro.
Any credible allegation of voter fraud should be taken seriously and investigated.
That being said, the action by Trump’s DOJ — charging just 28 individuals — suggests they have no evidence to back up their claims just last week of TENS or HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of illegally registered voters.
Yes, non-citizen voter registration and voting does happen in isolated instances — in California and the rest of the country alike — but it is so rare that the Trump admin is parading around town about .0001% of California voters.
If the feds were serious about this, they would have done this long ago — not in the middle of people voting, which inherently and needlessly sows distrust and doubt in our democracy.
Alright Lets Go retweeted
Replying to @TeamYouTube
That explains how modules work, not the eligibility restriction I’m asking about.
I’m ALREADY in YPP and have reached 4,000 watch hours.
Where does YouTube’s published policy state that an active strike prevents an EXISTING YPP member from activating Watch Page Ads?
Alright Lets Go retweeted
If you post that you’re boycotting Elon Musk’s products to your audience on X, you’re retarded.
Hi @TeamYouTube @reneritchie I need clarification on a YPP policy discrepancy.
YouTube states that existing YPP members aren't removed for receiving a Community Guidelines strike.
If an already-approved YPP member reaches 4,000 watch hours during an active strike, why are they blocked from activating Watch Page Ads?
The eligibility documentation specifically references APPLYING to YPP, not upgrading an EXISTING membership.
Is this an intentional policy restriction or an automated eligibility issue? Where is this distinction documented?
Alright Lets Go retweeted
Today, on what would have been his 33rd birthday, our Nation honors the loving memory of Charlie Kirk - a father, husband, Christian martyr, & titan of the conservative movement.
We renew our resolve to always defend our principles of truth, faith, & the open exchange of ideas.
Retarded Build a Bear gets caught lying…
I ran for mayor because I couldn’t accept the homelessness I saw on our streets. Since then, we’ve reduced homelessness by 11%, cut veteran homelessness by 50%, and brought homicides to a 60-year low.
With the Olympics coming to Los Angeles, we need leadership that delivers. I’m committed to building on this progress so our city is ready—and Angelenos see lasting benefits.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
LAHSA official point-in-time counts show City of Los Angeles homelessness rose from 41,980 in 2022 to 45,194 in 2026 (with a 3.4% increase to 2026 after prior declines); veteran homelessness fell substantially but ~42% since 2023 per counts, not 50%.
lahsa.org/news?article=1…
laalmanac.com/social/so14b.p…
lacounty.gov/2026/08/07/dat…
lacity.gov/news/los-angel…
abc7.com/post/homicides…
Alright Lets Go retweeted
Hey @TeamYouTube Possible bug in YPP Tier 1 → Tier 2 eligibility.
I'm already an approved YPP partner and have reached 4,000 watch hours, but an active strike is blocking Watch Page Ads.
Your published policy distinguishes existing partners from new applicants. Creator Support keeps citing application rules without explaining this restriction.
I've asked repeatedly for a specialist review, but keep getting generic responses.
Can someone investigate the eligibility gate on my account?
Alright Lets Go retweeted
Replying to @TeamYouTube
That's exactly the problem. I've contacted Creator Support repeatedly, and they keep sending me the same generic policy links without answering my questions.
I'm requesting an escalation because the existing support process isn't resolving the issue.
Who can actually review the YPP eligibility restriction on my account?
Alright Lets Go retweeted
I’m so confused by this whole debate.
Sydney Sweeney gets naked in an ad and people scream about women being sexualized.
Then Shane Gillis jokes about women wearing basically nothing at the gym and suddenly THE SAME WOMEN are saying women can wear whatever they want.” Which…they absolutely can.
But if wearing minimal clothing is empowering and your choice, why is simply noticing that it’s sexual suddenly objectification?
We need these women to pick a side…
Hey @TeamYouTube Possible bug in YPP Tier 1 → Tier 2 eligibility.
I'm already an approved YPP partner and have reached 4,000 watch hours, but an active strike is blocking Watch Page Ads.
Your published policy distinguishes existing partners from new applicants. Creator Support keeps citing application rules without explaining this restriction.
I've asked repeatedly for a specialist review, but keep getting generic responses.
Can someone investigate the eligibility gate on my account?
Alright Lets Go retweeted
Let's have a look at what the dumbocrats are up to behind closed doors... 🤣


















