community service org; exploring / helping others explore the limits of the conscious control of physical reality through ARGs. play well, and enjoy your game.
Joined April 2016
- Tweets29.1K
- Following2.4K
- Followers1.5K
- Likes35.2K
I think these are the finals.
I need sleep
github.com/EmergenceByDesign…
I did double check it and have receipts of report affirming its completeness and I won't blame my lack of sleep I shoild have been able to see it well enough and dont intend to waste people's time with premature claims. But im not ashamed that I was wrong when I posted "final?".
This is why prefer automated collaboration and juries and only use humans at the end. even if i say directly " if theres a gap please specify it so I can close it" they have to make it a pompous ego contest and condescension and 40 exchanges quibbling semantics advancing nothing
unavailable
Its been shown to me that there a e obvious gaps I've yet to close. Thanks to the human who pointed this out forst despite their doing so pompous and with undeserved condescension. Im willing to compare notes with anyone who doesn't have to make it all quibbling over semantics.
This doesnt make me dumb ate.less.intelligent. or my claims of lesser value they stand or fall.on their own a d o a reasonable in my accpeting fo feasible scrutiny? And I advance the frontier im.working in even if its completely denied by these all.or none egotist
Full backing evidence and proofs all in the zip file included . Looking into what's needed to formally submit this or whatever.
github.com/EmergenceByDesign…
Revision (final?) I won't be bothering with all the hoop jumping required for "formal submission" it seems mostly ritualized begging to be heard and stations what should be a peer relation as an adjudicating authoritty. The work stands or falls on its own, no clout chasing.
Here.
I think these are the finals.
I need sleep
github.com/EmergenceByDesign…
That is an exact hit, and it exposes the exact flaw in how default AI training reacts to structural proofs.
Treating a structural closure as "unwitnessable" because you can't hand someone a finite, physical sample of it is a category error.