Pinned Tweet
60 milhões de eleitores brasileiros depositaram sua confiança num agente infiltrado dos EUA, cuja missão era entregar as riquezas do Brasil a um país estrangeiro. Um traidor que, diante da derrota, foi resgatado, sacado do território brasileiro pelo governo Trump.
A eleição de Flávio significaria a perda da soberania do Estado brasileiro. Espero que a ficha tenha caído para aqueles que foram ludibriados na sua boa-fé.
A luz feita pelo fotógrafo foi perfeita. Ele captou com maestria o criminoso que Flávio Bolsonaro é.
"The Girl from Ipanema," a Bossa Nova classic. Tom Jobim was one of the great Brazilian composers. The influence of Jazz was evident in his harmonic progressions.
"Espera-se que Marco Rubio renuncie ao cargo e lance sua candidatura à presidência dos Estados Unidos".
Só espero que o eleitor norte-americano tenha enxergado o que o MAGA representa.
Roteiro dos próximos dias: FUGA para a Flórida nos EUA.
Em meio a processo de impeachment no Paraguai, Santiago Peña pede calma e diz que vai se defender
www1.folha.uol.com.br/mundo/…
Se a intenção do presidente paraguaio era livrar-se do impeachment com a renúncia, seu estratagema não deu certo. O mal do malandro é achar que todo o resto é otário.
RECHAZARON LA RENUNCIA DE PEÑA Y DEBERÁ ENFRENTAR UN JUICIO POLÍTICO
Lectura rápida
La Cámara de Diputados de Paraguay rechazó por unanimidad la renuncia de Santiago Peña e impulsó un juicio político. La decisión impide que el mandatario acceda como senador vitalicio a las inmunidades que habría conservado al dimitir. Peña continúa en la Presidencia y confirmó que se presentará ante el Senado para ejercer su defensa.
Proceso en el Senado
El juicio político también incluye al vicepresidente Pedro Alliana, quien habría reemplazado a Peña si se aceptaba su renuncia. El Senado prepara una sesión para mañana por la mañana con la presencia del mandatario. Peña está acusado de conflicto de intereses, utilización del Estado en beneficio privado y presunto direccionamiento irregular de fondos jubilatorios hacia Ueno Bank.
Ruptura con el oficialismo
El Partido Colorado, que domina el Parlamento, retiró su respaldo al presidente. Su líder y padrino político de Peña, Horacio Cartes, apoyó el juicio político y afirmó que no se pondría del lado del “saqueo de fondos públicos y privados”. El vocero presidencial aseguró que Peña permanece en Paraguay y negó versiones sobre una salida del país.
Impacto económico
Las manifestaciones crecieron durante la noche, con ahorristas que reclamaban su dinero y empleados que exigían salarios e indemnizaciones. El Ministerio de Trabajo estima que el colapso afectó cerca de 7.000 empleos directos e indirectos. Los bonos soberanos profundizaron sus pérdidas y el guaraní se depreció un 4,5%, según datos de Bloomberg.
(+) en Clarín: clar.in/4A7kAD8
André Telles retweeted
Foram dois anos de boicote com Campos Neto e mais dois anos com o Galípolo. Em Brasília, todo mundo sabe quem é quem no jogo. Será que o Galípolo foi mais um que conseguiu enganar a todos, inclusive o Haddad?
A extrema-direita é integrada por covardes! Agora surge a informação, dada pelos periódicos norte-americanos, de que Marco Rubio estaria cogitando renunciar ao cargo de secretário do governo Trump. JD Vance tb ensaia o afastamento. O navio começa a fazer água, os ratos fogem. Aliás, FUGA é com eles mesmos!
Netanyahu, para se manter no poder, iniciou um GENOCÍDIO em Gaza e, não satisfeito, declarou guerra ao Irã; tudo com o apoio dos EUA.
Donald Trump, Marco Rubio, JD Vance e Peter Hegseth não sabiam que bancar Israel num ato de limpeza étnica e numa guerra desnecessária contra o Irã por US$ 30 bilhões -- dinheiro do contribuinte -- sendo que ainda não havia o risco iminente de produção de uma bomba nuclear, não iria custar a repulsa dos cidadãos norte-americanos insatisfeitos com a alta da inflação e do custo de vida?
Abdul El-Sayed, Senador eleito pelo Michigan, chamou JD Vance de “Habibi".
Traduzindo: o MAGA se fodeu!
Is JD Vance trying to distance himself from Trump or not?
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Congratulations to Trump and Rubio. Game over.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.

















