0 → 200K+ Web3 Communities | Growth, Infrastructure & Ambassador Architect | DAU & Retention Systems || Building @BlockByBlock_HQ

England, United Kingdom
Joined October 2020
I run @BlockByBlock_HQ. Our Telegram and Discord community bots have a free 7-day trial that starts when you add them as admin. No card. See if new members stay, reward real sign-ups with verified missions (no screenshots) and get questions answered. blockbyblock.network
1
4
164,794
Free 7-day trial on Telegram and Discord. It starts when you add CommunityPulse as admin. No card. - See if new members stick around - Verified missions: reward real sign-ups, no screenshots - Daily mood and summaries - Questions answered for you blockbyblock.network
1
195
a single member sending 38% of your messages isn't engagement. it's a parasocial relationship you mistook for community. strip that person out and you have 12 people talking and 4,988 reading. measure who you actually have, not who's the loudest. one voice isn't a moat.
142
your community's first 48 hours are everything. new member joins. they either post in the first two days or they never post. that window closes. most teams sleep through it. by week two they're gone and you have no idea they were ever there. @BlockByBlock_HQ greets them by name, then tells you if they stuck. you can't keep what you don't know showed up. watch the onramp → blockbyblock.network/
1
1
121
i asked every project i worked with: "what's your weekly retention rate?" 6 out of 10 couldn't answer in under a week. the ones who knew? thriving. the ones who guessed? dying. measure the hard thing first. everything else is flavoring. see your real number → blockbyblock.network/
72
your community doesn't need more members. it needs members who stay. i've seen 50k-member communities die because 400 people kept joining and 360 left in week two. looks like growth. it's actually a leak you're not fixing. this is the metric nobody talks about because it's embarrassing. but it's the only one that matters.
148
the best moderator on my team was invisible to me. posted at night (timezone issue). quieter personality. answered more questions than anyone, just nobody noticed. i recognized everyone but them. that person left because of something i didn't do, not something they did wrong. systems matter because humans forget. @BlockByBlock_HQ remembers. see who you're missing → blockbyblock.network/
1
115
A community manager said something that stuck: "I can feel when the vibe is off, but I have no numbers to back it up." That's death in a startup. You can't propose a solution nobody can see. Sentiment matters specifically because it proves what you already know.
1
1
44
i ran a community for three years thinking my sentiment "felt right." turns out my feel was based on 40 loudest people out of 12k. 98% of the room wasn't represented in my gut check. data isn't cold. it's just honest. a number that contradicts your feeling is exactly the warning you need.
155
"why did they leave without saying anything?" because people don't resign from communities. they just post less, then not at all. by the time you "feel" it, they've been gone for weeks. the silence is the signal. notice it in week one, you might still save them. notice it in week four, they're already somewhere else.
210
your community has a timezone problem you haven't noticed yet. mine did. i was posting announcements in my evening, reaching my timezone perfectly, completely missing the 6 hours when my actual peak was awake. same message. right hour. 3x the engagement. @BlockByBlock_HQ shows you exactly when to post. find your peak → blockbyblock.network/
98
scaling from 12k to 200k members taught me this: scale doesn't solve problems. it amplifies them. a broken onramp at 5k members becomes catastrophic at 50k. the communities that stay healthy at scale aren't the ones doing the same thing bigger. they're the ones who get obsessed with fundamentals while the rest are distracted.
121
the second your community stops feeling like work and starts feeling like surveillance, you've already lost. i almost shipped a feature that would've done exactly that. "auto-dm quiet members" sounded helpful. it was just quiet monitoring. never mistake reach for permission. see what we refused to build → blockbyblock.network/
63
8 weeks, one thesis: your community IS the product. measuring it shouldn't be guesswork. we covered analytics, sentiment, FAQ automation, retention, recognition, missions, translation, daily AI briefs — all on telegram + discord, privacy-first. we are not building a bot. we are building the operating system for community. 🧱 if you run a community you care about, DM me. come see inside yours → blockbyblock.network/
1
1
280
your community keeps asking the same things you've never written down. @BlockByBlock_HQ catches every question the bot couldn't answer and drops it in a queue. one click turns it into a saved answer. your FAQ stops being a doc you maintain and starts building itself from what people actually ask. watch your FAQ build itself → blockbyblock.network/
1
143
built this for crypto communities. then a founder running a 20-person client channel asked: "can it ping me the second a client raises a concern we haven't answered?" turns out every high-stakes group chat has the same problem. @BlockByBlock_HQ catches it in real time — with a plain-english summary so nothing important gets buried. see it catch what matters → blockbyblock.network/
1
128
if you run more than one community, you know the pain: no idea how they're all doing without opening five apps and doing math in your head. @BlockByBlock_HQ puts every community in one place — same metrics, same view, switch in a tap. built for the people running the whole portfolio, not just one chat. see all yours in one place → blockbyblock.network/
1
213
we killed a feature our own team wanted to ship. "here are the 12 members who went quiet — DM them now." no. that's not community management, that's surveillance. members can feel the difference. every nudge @BlockByBlock_HQ makes is public and community-wide. never aimed at one person by name. see our approach → blockbyblock.network/
163
running a community on telegram AND discord is two jobs pretending to be one. two dashboards, two sets of blind spots, zero unified answer to "how are we actually doing?" @BlockByBlock_HQ runs natively on both. same analytics, same everything. one product, one honest picture. one view for both → blockbyblock.network/
123
we tested our sentiment engine on 600 of the most sarcastic crypto messages we could find. it got 598 right. the 2 it missed were pure deadpan even a human would argue about ("that's a strong argument."). reading a chat's real mood is brutally hard. @BlockByBlock_HQ does it every day, at 99%+. see for yourself → blockbyblock.network/
140