Yes. Agreed. On the one hand, I understand people's need to drive engagement, but real posts are always superior to "What are our thoughts on coffee?" This begs the question: "What is a real conversation?" I suggest that real conversations are conversations concerning the nature of reality, which are by-nature the opposite of superficial, mundane topics. The deeper the insight offered into the unchangeable nature and essence of reality, the more 'real' the conversation, regardless of what positive surface-facet is used as the topic. I imagine, hope, and pray for a future where the growing hunger for 'real conversations' like this continues to flourish; where people crave the final, conclusive, singular, unchallengeable answer to real questions, and are dissatisfied with fluff answers, with lies, and especially with lying to themselves. Did I go too far? 😅