
@annalschubert.bsky.social Professor for Analysis and Modeling of Complex Data @uni_mainz. Interested in indiv. differences, neuroscience, and modeling.
Mainz, Germany
Joined September 2016
- Tweets1.9K
- Following699
- Followers1.8K
- Likes1.8K
Anna-Lena Schubert retweeted
Für die MRT-Studie "Chronotyp" suchen wir explizit Versuchspersonen, die dem "Moderaten Morgentyp" entsprechen.
➡️ Um herauszufinden, welcher Chronotyp ihr seid, könnt ihr den Fragebogen auf unserer Webseite ausfüllen.
Mehr Infos & Anmeldung👇
ifado.de/de/studien/chronoty…
Anna-Lena Schubert retweeted
With @AnnaLSchubert, Gidon Frischkorn, and Klaus Oberauer
Anna-Lena Schubert retweeted
Wir suchen Versuchspersonen für die neue EEG-Studie "Walking and Seeing (WaS2 – Guided Attention)" zwischen 18 und 30 Jahren. Die Versuchspersonen laufen auf einem Laufband, während sie eine kognitive Aufgabe lösen.
Mehr Infos & Anmeldung👇
ifado.de/de/studien/walking-…
Anna-Lena Schubert retweeted
Wie hängen Neugier, Interessen und Intelligenz zusammen? 🤔 In der neuesten Folge sprechen @AnnaLSchubert und @King_Sirus mit Prof. Dr. Matthias Ziegler über die spannende Wechselwirkung zwischen Persönlichkeit und Intelligenz. Hört jetzt rein! 🎙️ 👉 denkbar.letscast.fm/episode/…
Anna-Lena Schubert retweeted
My wonderful colleagues from the scientific support team seek a scientific consultant - come join us!
We're #hiring! Join our dedicated team and shape the future of #neurophysiological research with us! We are actively seeking a Scientific Consultant to join our Scientific Support team in Gilching, near #Munich. #consultant #offenestelle #newjob #job
💡brainproducts.com/about-us/c…
Anna-Lena Schubert retweeted
#EEG might be better left alone, but #ERPs must be attended to.
Using #multiverse analyses, we showed that artifact rejection is crucial for enhancing LPP data quality.
The LPP's affective modulation is robust to most preprocessing variation.
sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
Anna-Lena Schubert retweeted
Many of us can save a child's life, if we rely on the best data.
Giving money to a charity is one of the best things you can do for others. Your donation can make a huge difference.
But whether or not your donation makes a difference greatly depends on where you donate.
If you give your money to the least cost-effective charities, it will not do much. If you give it to an exceptionally effective charity, the same amount of money can save someone’s life.
We all feel that some charities are more effective than others, but we tend to underestimate just how large the differences are.
Anna-Lena Schubert retweeted
Der #DGPs2024 Kongress in Wien beginnt bald & wir freuen uns auf ein spannendes, abwechslungsreiches Programm! Auch wir haben einige Veranstaltungen, zu denen wir einladen möchten ⬇️
Anna-Lena Schubert retweeted
New paper! The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science.
Check a novel interactive platform hosting 1,239 originals paired w/ replication findings
forrt-replications.shinyapps….
Published in @up_jopd led by @aufdroeseler doi.org/10.5334/jopd.101
Anna-Lena Schubert retweeted
New paper! Based on the performance of 591 LLMs on 12 tasks, we found:
1) A positive manifold (mean r = .73)
2) An Artificial General Ability (AGA) factor explaining 66% of test variance.
3) Parameters correlate positively with AGA (r ≈ .6) sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
Anna-Lena Schubert retweeted
Ihr liebt die Arbeit mit Patient:innen? Ihr liebt Forschung? Ihr arbeitet gern in einem super Team? Ihr wollt eine Verbeamtung an einem Ort, an dem andere Urlaub machen?
Hier entlang:
stellen.uni-konstanz.de/jobp…
Anna-Lena Schubert retweeted
Do you like Network Psychometrics, Structural Equation Modeling, & Confirmatory Factor Analysis? Have you ever wondered what to do if your bifactor model fits the data better than a correlated traits model, even when it shouldn't? Introducing: Generalized TEFI. Read more below...
Golino et al. (2021) developed a family of fit indices based on information/quantum information theory. The most accurate of them all is the Total Entropy Fit Index (TEFI).
The TEFI index computes the distance between the mean Von Neumann entropy (Von Neumann, 1927) of the dimensions (factors or communities) and the total entropy of the system of variables, and adds a penalization to the number of dimensions estimated.
This equation integrates three key components: the average entropy across dimensions or factors (A), the number of dimensions (B), and the total entropy of the system (C). The total entropy fit index can be re-written as TEFI = [P1] + [P2], in which [P1] = A and [P2] = (C − A) × √B. Golino et al. (2021) argues that [P1] is expected to decrease monotonically as the number of factors increases, but [P2] is expected to increase as the number of factors increase, representing the reduction in average entropy of a set of data conditional on a given dimensional (factor) structure. Finally, the square root of the number of factors was chosen in [P2] by Golino et al. (2021) to control the expected growth trajectory of [P2] as the number of factors increases. The effect of adding an additional factor would be conditional on the number of factors already being estimated in the model, showing a decreasing effect as the number of factors increases. In summary, TEFI computes the distance between the mean Von Neumann entropy of the dimensions (factors or communities) and the total entropy of the system of variables, and adds a penalization to the number of dimensions estimated.
The Generalized Total Entropy Fit Index
As can be noted by equation 3, TEFI can only be computed in single-level structures (e.g., those reflecting first-order factors or communities). At present, there’s no way for TEFI to take into consideration more complex dimensionality structures, such as bifactor structures with multiple correlated general factors. Expanding TEFI to accommodate dimensionality structures in two levels requires adding two new components to equation 3. One, [P3], representing the distance (or difference) between the sum of the Von Neumann entropy of the second-level dimensions, E, relative to (i.e., divided by) the number of first-level dimensions (first-order factors, group factors, first-order communities), B, and the total entropy of the system of variables (C). The other component to be added ([P4]), is similar to the penalization component [P2] of TEFI, but replaces A by E (the sum of the individual Von Neumann entropy of the second-level dimensions). The simplified version of The generalized total entropy fit index is, therefore:
GenTEFI = [ A + (C − A) × √B] + [ E + (C − E) × √B], or
GenTEFI = [P1] + [P2] + [P3] + [P4],
where
[P3] = (E/B) − C
and
[P4] = (C − E) × √B.
The generalized total entropy fit index can be seen as an additive fit index combining a first-order TEFI (TEFIFirst-Order = [P1] + [P2]) and a second-order TEFI (TEFISecond-Order = [P3] + [P4]).
The generalized TEFI can be, finally, formulated as:
Interesting Properties of The Generalized Total Entropy Fit Index
To demonstrate the applicability of the GenTEFI in comparing structures with varied organizations---such as correlated traits versus bifactor models---data were generated under two distinct conditions. In the first scenario, we generated data using a correlated traits structure, characterized by factor loadings between 0.45 and 0.75, correlations between factors ranging from 0.00 (orthogonal) to 0.70, and four variables per factor in a total of four factors. In the second scenario, the data was generated using a bifactor model comprising four group factors and one general factor, with four variables per group factor. Here, the loadings on the group factors varied from 0.45 to 0.55, while those on the general factors ranged from 0.45 to 0.70. For each model, we generated 100 datasets, each consisting of 5,000 observations, to robustly assess the characteristics of the GenTEFI (more specifically, the lower-order or first-order TEFI and the high-order or second-order TEFI values) across these different structural configurations.
The figure above is a hexagonal binning plot, and shows the relationship between factor loadings and the first and second-order TEFI under varying conditions of a correlated traits model. The use of hexagonal cells enables a clear depiction of data point density, with color gradients indicating the concentration of points---brighter yellow hues signifying greater densities.
The plot's facets correspond to different levels of interfactor correlation, ranging from orthogonal (zero correlation) to highly correlated factors, enabling a comparative analysis across the spectrum of loading magnitudes. The hexagons' borders are color-coded to denote the level of TEFI: red for second-order TEFI and gray for first-order TEFI (TEFI_{First-Order} = [P1]+[P2], TEFI_{Second-Order} = [P3]+[P4], see equation 4).
The figure reveals that, for orthogonal or weakly correlated trait structures, the first-order TEFI values are consistently lower than those of the second-order meaning the *uncertainty* of the correlated traits structure is *lower* than the bifactor structure.
The first-order TEFI was computed in a structure that mirrors the true four-factor model whereas the second-order TEFI is based on an assumed but incorrect higher-order factor.
Interestingly, as interfactor correlations strengthen, the gap between first and second-order TEFI narrows. At higher interfactor correlations, the second-order TEFI becomes less than the first-order, suggesting an emergent second-order structure.
These observations underscore two key insights regarding the GenTEFI: its sensitivity to distinguishing between correlated traits and bifactor or hierarchical structures and its responsiveness to changes in the correlation between factors, which reflects different organizational complexities within the data structure. As the correlation increases, more information is being shared between the factors, which makes them more mixed or presents a higher disorganization and higher uncertainty. As in physical systems, systems of variables with mixed states show a higher entropy, disorganization, or uncertainty than systems well-compartmentalized into distinct sets. Consequently, with increased correlations between factors, the overall system of variables has a higher entropy or uncertainty than the average entropy of its individual factors. This suggests that the global interactions of the variables contribute more to its entropy than the internal structure of its factors. Consequently, the uncertainty of a hypothetical second-order factor decreases. In other words, as the correlations between factors increase, a second-order structure emerges.
In Figure the figure above, a hexagonal binning plot shows the relationship between factor loadings and the Total Entropy Fit Index (TEFI) under varying conditions of a bifactor model. Loadings of the general factors are represented in the x-axis, and the grid represent different magnitude of the first-order factor loadings (or loadings of the group factors). The plot indicates that the values for second-order TEFI are lower than for the first-order ones, and this gap grows as the general factors' loadings increase. This distinction between the first and second-order TEFI values highlights the usefulness of the `GenTEFI`. In short, both Figures illustrate that `GenTEFI` is an effective new tool for analyzing the dimensionality of psychology data---it helps differentiate between a correlated traits model and a bifactor model.
When the underlying structure of the data is a correlated traits model, first-order TEFI values are smaller (more negative) than second-order ones.
Interested in learning more? Check our our pre-print:
Golino, H., Jiménez, M., Garrido, L. E., & Christensen, A. P. (2024, March 19). Generalized Total Entropy Fit Index: A new fit index to compare bifactor and correlated factor structures in SEM and network psychometrics. doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5g3h…
Anna-Lena Schubert retweeted
I started a YouTube channel! The videos will broadly fall into these categories:
- Academia as an early career researcher
- Technical data science and ML
- Applied R and Python
In my first video, I talk about my background and my plans for the channel:
youtube.com/watch?v=5Z9yNEgb…
Anna-Lena Schubert retweeted
Excited to share that @MarvinSchmittML is starting a new YouTube channel about exotic topics in stats, ML/DL, comp modeling, and ... occasional musical experiments:
youtube.com/watch?v=5Z9yNEgb…
Be sure to subscribe and stay tuned!
Anna-Lena Schubert retweeted
What is the most bizarre distribution you worked with?
Here are Garmin VivoSmart4 stress score data (n=1000, t=90 days).
| ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄|
Send help
|________|
(\__/) ||
(•ㅅ•). ||
/ づ
(from osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/yb…)
Anna-Lena Schubert retweeted
Looking for a permanent position in psychophysiology and behavioral neuroscience methods-tech support?
Come and join us in Bielefeld!
uni-bielefeld.hr4you.org/job…
Anna-Lena Schubert retweeted
Keine Finanzierung – keine Therapie! Lasst uns für gesetzliche Regelungen zur #Psychotherapie-Weiterbildung im #GVSG laut werden. Kommt alle zur Demo am 6. Juni um 12 Uhr in Berlin. Es geht um die Zukunft der Psychotherapie in Deutschland! #PsychotherapieIstUnersetzlich
Anna-Lena Schubert retweeted
😃Looking forward to the PUG in Hamburg @bioDGPs_DGPA and to our symposium at Thursday 10:30am: >> We Discuss how the Study of Brain States Contributes to our Understanding of Human Cognition with @_markett_ ,@sofievalk,@krohn_stephan ,@urs_braun,Jonas Thiele,Jasmin Kizilirmak😍
Anna-Lena Schubert retweeted
Die Vorfreude für die #PuG2024 steigt!
Ein Highlight der Konferenz, das man sich unbedingt im Kalender vormerken sollte, ist der #Posterblitz, der von den JuWis der bioDGPs und DGPA organisiert wird. Er findet am Do um 14:45 Uhr im großen Auditorium statt.
1/2
Anna-Lena Schubert retweeted
Stellenausschreibung W1-Professur für Psychologische Methodenlehre und Diagnostik mit Tenure Track an der FAU mit explizitem Wunsch der Beteiligung an rechtspsychologischer Forschung und Lehre (Deadline schon 26.5.)! fau.de/people/arbeiten-an-de…































