AP Williams ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@AparryW) header
AP Williams ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@AparryW) profile picture
Nelson Mandela Bay
Joined June 2014
Photo by AP Williams ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@AparryW)Photo by AP Williams ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@AparryW)Photo by AP Williams ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@AparryW)Photo by AP Williams ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@AparryW)Photo by AP Williams ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@AparryW)Photo by AP Williams ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@AparryW)Photo by AP Williams ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@AparryW)Photo by AP Williams ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@AparryW)Photo by AP Williams ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@AparryW)
AP Williams ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
THINK ABOUT IT. - Bill Gates had lots of illicit girlfriendsโ€”no problem. - Elon Musk has multiple children with multiple womenโ€”no problem. - Dario Amodei dated a Chinese woman, Jade Wang, before marrying Cami Clark, who pitched a pornography business to none other than Jeffrey Epsteinโ€”no problem. - But Jensen Huang commits old-fashioned infidelityโ€”and this is such a big problem that he has to resign? Doesnโ€™t make sense. Hereโ€™s the real story. . CHAPTER ONE: BIDENโ€™S CHIP WAR Jensen Huang of Nvidia was puzzled. It was 2022, and his video-graphics processors had become globally popular as the heart of high-end computing across the planet. But that autumn, Biden violated the World Trade Organizationโ€™s most fundamental principles. He ordered the worldโ€™s makers of advanced semiconductor chips and chipmaking equipment (in the Netherlands, Taiwan and Japan) to stop sales to China. Bidenโ€™s administration implied that the chips were for Chinaโ€™s military gear, but this was a lie. The USโ€™s own security establishment admitted that 99.9 per cent were used for civilian purposes, like medical technology and AI computing. Huang was dismayed. He could no longer sell Nvidiaโ€™s A100 and H100 to China. . CHAPTER TWO: SOLVING A PROBLEM Jensen Huang was a problem-solver. In February of 2024, Nvidia launched the H20, a made-for-China AI chip less powerful than its US-only top model. That way he could keep the US government happy but also have something to sell to the Chinese. Not everyone in the US was happy about this, and export rules fluctuated. . CHAPTER THREE: THE DEEPSEEK MOMENT In January 2025, a nerdy young man from the Chinese finance industry announced that his firm Deepseek had quickly and cheaply created a high-efficiency open-weight AI. The implication was huge: the Chinese were finding ways to develop top level AI functionality without massive clusters of top-tier Nvidia GPUs. Jensen Huang knew he had to respond urgently to keep his place in the China market. He flew to meet trade officials in Beijing in the middle of April and vowed to make "every effort" to serve the Chinese. The US anti-China hawks had been quietly mobilizingโ€”and made an announcement. In April of 2025, the US banned all export of Jensen Huangโ€™s H20s to China. Unbelievable! The Nvidia CEO was furious. "Anybody who thought that one chess move to ban China from H20s would cut off their AI ability is deeply uninformed," Huang told an interviewer at a trade meeting in Taipei. . CHAPTER FOUR: HUANGโ€™S SPECIAL SKILL Then came some rare good news. The Nvidia CEO started lobbying Trump behind the scenes. Huang was a master negotiator โ€“ and his efforts proved successful. In the middle of July, 2025, Huang was back in Chinaโ€”his third trip in 12 months. Huang appeared without his signature black leather jacket. Instead, he wore a traditional Chinese tang suit, and made some of his speech in Mandarin. Washington had cleared the way for Nvidia to export the H20 to China, he said. Weโ€™re back! Trump had demanded a cash cut of H20 sales in return for approving the exportsโ€”US government policy appeared to be literally for sale. . CHAPTER FIVE: SPOOKS WERE NOT HAPPY Huang was moving chips to China again, and the anti-China hawks in the US government were unhappyโ€”and so were the spooks. Thereโ€™s a widespread tendency to visualize the US intelligence community as right-leaning hard men, Trumpites in black suits. This was the opposite of the truth. The CIA leadership greatly preferred the simple, blanket negativity towards โ€œthe enemyโ€ characteristic of the Democratic Party. With Russians, Chinese, and North Koreans portrayed as cartoon villains, black ops were justifiable. But for all his bluster, Trump had a propensity towards treating the leaders of Russia, China and even North Korea, as actual humans who could be negotiated with. This transactional approach was enormously problematic for the CIA, which needed cartoon villains to justify their annual budget of more than US$15 billion. And Trumpโ€™s habit of parachuting unsuitable new leaders in to command the intelligence communityโ€”such as the widely disliked Mike Pompeoโ€”crystalized the negativity, as CIA chroniclers have written. . CHAPTER SIX: A TWIST IN THE TALE Jensen Huangโ€™s celebrations were short-lived. In an unexpected twist, China in September 2025 said it did not want Nvidia chips and would no longer buy them. - US$15 billion in sales projections vanished. - Nvidia had to write off a reported $5.5 billion in inventory losses. - The company had now completely lost access to China's AI market, estimated at US$50 billion. - And hard evidence was emerging that Chinese companies were building alternatives even for CUDA (a unique element in Nvidia chips). Huang wanted more positivity from the US. Nvidia was a US firm, and it went from having a 95% market share in China to 0%. โ€œI canโ€™t imagine any policymaker thinking that thatโ€™s a good idea,โ€ he told reporters. . CHAPTER SEVEN: AGAIN, HE SOLVES THE PROBLEM But Huangโ€™s extraordinary skill in dealing with Trump paid off again, and by mid-2026, the Nvidia business found a complex equilibrium had emerged in its China business. Huang had (in December 2025) persuaded the US President to allow Nvidia to sell even the high-powered H200 chip to China, as long as the US government got 25% of the take. So a range of Nvidia chips could again be sold in China. - Other Nvidia chips were arriving in China via the black market. - There were suspicions that companies in Singapore and Malaysia, such as Megaspeed, were flouting export restrictions, also delivering chips. - Some Nvidia chips were stuck in Hong Kong, trapped by the confusing, ever-changing rules, but were expected to be released eventually. - On the downside (from Huangโ€™s point of view), new China-origin chips, notably Huaweiโ€™s Ascend 950, were catching up with advanced capabilities that mimicked those of Nvidia. In short, China was back in the game. . CHAPTER EIGHT: TAKING HIM DOWN Something had to be done. China had to be dealt with. But first, Huang had to be taken down. The US anti-China hawks saw Huangโ€™s success in making deals with Trump as a key part of the problem. It was an element which had to be surgically removed. The CIA and their partners in the western mainstream media sprang into action. In October 2026, the US intelligence community told New York Times reporters that there were suspicions that Huangโ€™s mistress, Alice Huang Le, was a Chinese spy. It provided no evidence. The allegation was plainly ridiculousโ€”the flow of legitimate and illegitimate chips across the border was no secret, and the idea that discussions about the detailed minutiae of nano-level semiconductor engineering could be exchanged during pillow talk was ridiculous, even comedic. But when the US intelligence community and the mainstream media join forces, theyโ€™re virtually invincible. At this moment in the process, the complicit media are playing its role. A typical headline was that in the Economist yesterday: โ€œJensen Huang must resign.โ€ . EPILOGUE Jensen Huang resigned. Trump has been weakened. The worldโ€™s public has been fooled with the โ€œhoneypotโ€ story. Chinaโ€™s Huawei is pressing aheadโ€”with new, powerful versions of its Ascend chips slated to come out in 2027 and 2028. . .
383
3,038
353
10,107
793,687
AP Williams ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
Moderna's wicked new flu product (mFLUSIVA) just came out two months ago. Already there are 48 reports of injury in VAERS, representing a small fraction of the whole. They read very much like the early reports of the Covid poisons. Same signs. V-Safe entries clock the decline from fatigue to injection-site pain to headaches to rashes to GI issues to limb dysfunction and on and on, like a poisoning, ending in disability and sometimes death. You can see all the signs that this is happening right now with this new injection. Will no one at the FDA stop the madness before it is too late? openvaers.com/search-vaers?qโ€ฆ
119
887
65
2,231
85,936
AP Williams ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
Earth is still in an Ice Age, and almost nobody knows it. Ice ages don't end when the glaciers melt; they end when all polar ice disappears completely. Right now, ice still covers Antarctica and the Arctic; which means by scientific definition we are still in an Ice Age. What we are living in - right now - is called an interglacial period, a warm pause, a temporary thaw between glacial advances. The current interglacial - called the Holocene - began about 11,700 years ago. Every human civilisation, that has ever existed - Ancient Egypt, Rome, China - all of it happened inside this single warm pause. And here is what makes this deeply unsettling; in the last 2.58 million years the Earth has cycled through at least 50 glacial advances. The warm pauses between them typically last 10,000 to 30,000 years. We are already 11,700 years into ours. The ice cores drilled from Antarctica tells us exactly what happened before. Every interglacial ends; every one! The temperature drops, the glaciers advance, and ice sheets kilometres thick crush everything beneath them. During the last Glacial Maximum just 20,000 years ago, ice sheets covered most of North America, Northern Europe and Asia. New York City was under a kilometre of ice. And none of that required a catastrophe. It happened slowly and quietly, driven by wobbles in Earth's orbit around the Sun, called the Milankovitch cycles. The next glacial advance will come; not tomorrow, not in our lifetime. But it will come. We are not living 'after' the Ice Age: We're living inside it. facebook.com/share/v/1MaGGCRโ€ฆ
109
1,215
94
3,385
60,000
AP Williams ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
โ€œYou can vote for a different party, but the agenda never changes.โ€ Bernie Spofforth takes aim at the UNโ€™s unelected influence, arguing that politicians carry out its agenda while voters are shut out @Artemisfornow A blistering speech which everyone needs to take notice of. Watch in full ๐Ÿ‘‡
66
528
55
1,158
66,127
AP Williams ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
Hello, dear friends! Lyudmila Bentley is here. I remain a devoted wife to my beloved husband, Russell 'Texas' Bentley, until the end of my days on this Earth. And from this moment on, I will be running this page in memory of him. Welcome to all the good people of the world...
2
4
26
324
AP Williams ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
The Club of Rome was founded in the late 1960s by a core of disenchanted scientists, rich industrialists and bureaucrats. They were the embryo of today's familiar climate activism aims, blaming unchecked population growth, industrial expansion and resource consumption for an impending collapse of civilisation within a century. Their 1972 report, The Limits to Growth, popularised the concept of finite planetary boundaries and the perceived necessity of global growth management. This same core ideology drives the supranational climate agenda today. In 1951, the UN incorporated the World Meteorological Organization, and in 1988 it created the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. These twin agencies became the chief architects of an ongoing environmental crisis narrative. Both operate with explicit political mandates: providing governments with curated scientific rationale to justify top-down climate mandates. The underlying aim was always to frame human development - driven by energy use and population - as an existential threat. While IPCC assessment reports themselves were often selectively edited, UN leadership routinely amplified only the most radical, worst-case projections, distilling complex data into slogans of 'global boiling' or a 'code red for humanity'. The result has been a feedback loop of escalating rhetoric, artificial urgency and public hysteria - language not supported even by the underlying technical documents. Meanwhile, dissent was quietly neutralised; scientific careers were bypassed, funding diverted and academic tenure denied to those who questioned this orthodoxy. The core scientific claim relies on the premise that human emissions - roughly 3 to 4% of the total annual carbon flux - are overwhelming a naturally stable cycle. Yet Earth has experienced multiple sustained warm periods throughout the current Holocene interglacial; temperatures were 1 to 2ยฐC warmer than today during the Holocene Climatic Optimum 8,000 to 5,000 years ago. The previous warm interglacial period, the Eemian, was 2ยฐC warmer than today; African megafauna lived in the Thames Valley. COโ‚‚ played no part. Furthermore, satellite observations confirm the planet has greened dramatically since the 1980s, expanding leaf-area index by an area equivalent to twice the continental United States - primarily driven by COโ‚‚ fertilisation (NASA 2016, 2019; Zhu et al, Chen et al). While adding atmospheric COโ‚‚ produces warming, it does so on a diminishing logarithmic scale. The critical debate, therefore, has never been basic physics, but rather the magnitude of warming, the balance of real-world harms, and whether the mandated policy remedies are worse than the disease. After four decades of warning and trillions of dollars in subsidies, wind and solar still supply only about 6% of global primary energy, while dense hydrocarbon fuels generate 82% (Statistical Review of World Energy 2024). Western economies have been rushed into rapid, capital-intensive energy transitions for which grid infrastructure was never designed, driving systemic price spikes and manufacturing off-shoring. Strategic dominance over supply chains has shifted, with China now manufacturing over 90% of the worldโ€™s solar panels and wind turbines. Meanwhile, annual COP summits have evolved into the worldโ€™s most extravagant traveling public relations circus - generating an estimated 100,000 tonnes of COโ‚‚ at COP26 alone from fleets of private jets and five-star accommodations - to broker sweeping pledges that developing nations have little capacity or intention to fulfill. That the climate debate touches on legitimate environmental questions is to be expected. But the overarching policy response has been shaped from its genesis by the same impulse that birthed the Club of Rome: restrict energy use, limit economic growth, and dilute national sovereignty.
106
682
66
1,212
24,174
"The epitome of the corruption of science". "An advertising piece by the WHO" @SAHPRA1 @HealthZA ???
The @WHO claim that โ€œvaccines have saved 154 million lives globally over 50 yearsโ€ is the epitome of the corruption of science. Hereโ€™s whyโ€ฆ
2
71
A rule which could save a nation from ruin. If only it could be honestly applied. @CyrilRamaphosa @MYANC @geordinhl @Our_DA
Politicians across the world should memorize these words ๐Ÿ‘‡ "Those who serve as officials must not pursue wealth; those who pursue wealth must not seek official positions. Be clean and upright, and serve as an official with unwavering determination. As long as the breeding grounds and conditions for corruption still exist, we must keep sounding the bugle and never rest, not in a minute, in our fight against #corruption."
28
AP Williams ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
Former BlackRock fund manager Ed Dowd on the Covid-jab "scandal," including 500,000 excess deaths in 2021 in the U.S., disabilities, and "turbo cancers"โ˜ ๏ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ "shouldn't the health authorities be monitoring these signals?" "this is a scandal that's living with us right now" "right around the vaccine rollout, everything changed. That's when disabilities took off... In February of '21, they just took off, especially amongst those who are employed" "[in] 2021, another 500,000 Americans died [following 500,000 excess deaths in 2020], but there was a mix shift from old to young. All of a sudden, young people started croaking" "did the virus decide to morph into an age-specific virus? Nope, that's not how the world works. So it really was all about the vaccine" "and cancers in that age group [25 to 45 years old], except for colon cancer... [were] on the decline. Then in 2021, they all inflected... and every kind of cancer jumped" "it was like [a] 10 to 12โ€“standard deviation change from trend. Which, for your audience... [is] a signal" "[a] 3.4โ€“standard deviation represents the chance of you individually getting hit by lightning at least once in your lifetime. So it's not supposed to happen. So when you see [a 12โ€“standard deviation trend change], it's... a signal" @DowdEdward @briteresi
24
330
30
685
15,056
Imagine that.
eir.news/2026/10/news/glazyeโ€ฆ Sergey Glazyev, Russiaโ€™s foremost economist, warned that โ€œtechnofascistโ€ financial interests in the West have generated a gigantic speculative bubble of over $2 quadrillion that is leading to โ€œthe collapse of the whole financial system.โ€ In a wide-ranging Oct. 26 interview youtube.com/watch?v=8Eb5aSncโ€ฆ with Indian geopolitical economist and journalist Radhika Desai on the sidelines of the Global Governance Forum in Xiongโ€™an New Area, Hebei Province, China, Glazyevโ€”who is a Russian academician and member of the Russian Academy of Sciencesโ€”stated that the center of the world economy has shifted to the East, whether the West likes it or not. His pivotal discussion of the financial crisis in the West was as follows: โ€œGlazyev: What we see is a huge financial bubble, which concentrated about 40% of the American financial market in these IT companies, which continue to show good health. But what theyโ€™re doing is moving towards technofascism. In fact, the main strategic planning center of all these wars is the American technofascists, because they are trying to maintain their leadership not only in the United States but also in the world. They have a huge influence on the Trump administrationโ€ฆ. These really are technofascists who are sure that they can rule the world with these new technologies. It is very dangerous for the world, but it will not work, because in fact the maintenance of this artificial intelligence psychosis is based on virtual [reality].... โ€œThis financial bubble will in any case collapse. And I am sure that in the near future the American and Western financial system will suffer a huge crisis, not only because of the artificial intelligence bubble, but also because of the derivatives bubble. According to some estimates, the derivatives bubble is more than two quadrillion dollars. โ€œDesai: Wow. โ€œGlazyev: And if oil prices are going up... โ€œDesai: So a quadrillion is a thousand trillion, is that right? โ€œGlazyev: A thousand trillion, yes. So if oil prices are going up, it means that interest rates will go up. To fight inflation, central banks will have to increase interest rates, and it will lead to the collapse of credit default swaps and finally the collapse of the whole financial system. I think we are moving in this directionโ€ฆ. โ€œDesai: How do you assess the state of the Ukraine war right now? What do you think is going to happen?... โ€œGlazyev: Unfortunately, the politicians who make decisions in the West, especially in Britain at the moment... they want to continue the warโ€ฆ I can tell you that the war will finish together with the collapse of the artificial intelligence financial bubble.โ€
55
Their intentions are written down for all to see. Why are so many reluctant to take them at their word?
These are the 3 Globalist documents that you really should read, to understand what we face, under UK Gov't supported "One World Global Governance" United Nations Agenda 2030: here sdgs.un.org/sites/default/fiโ€ฆ Operation LOCKSTEP by the Rockefeller Foundation: here rstv.mikerockstone.com/wp-coโ€ฆ this is a "scenario's" paper, but shows you how utterly ruthless they are! ABSOLUTE (Net) ZERO: here ukfires.org/wp-content/uploaโ€ฆ is perhaps the most frightening, as it is a UK document detailing how we will be forced to live under Net Zero. Do YOU want to know the TRUTH? Or will you just scroll past these links?
36
What China did in the past 30 years. How do we compare? @MYANC @Our_DA @CyrilRamaphosa @TimesLIVE
๐—–๐—›๐—œ๐—ก๐—” ๐—ช๐—”๐—ฆ ๐—ก๐—ข๐—ง ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ฌ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฌ ๐—ฌ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ฆ ๐—”๐—š๐—ข. ๐—ง๐—ข๐——๐—”๐—ฌ ๐—œ๐—ง'๐—ฆ ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ฌ. I landed in China in 1995. ๐—œ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜. ๐—œ๐˜ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น. Pollution was really bad. Some days you could taste the air. Hygiene was a big problem. Public toilets you avoided if you could. Getting sick from food or water happened to everyone sooner or later. Outside the cities it was real poverty. ๐—œ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐˜€๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜‡๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ผ ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐˜€. That stays with you. Foreigners were rare. ๐—œ ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜… ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ต๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜€๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป ๐—–๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฎ ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ. You became the attraction. For many, you were the first foreigner they had ever seen. Backpacking was a real adventure. No fast trains, hardly any highways. Crossing the country meant long-distance buses on bad roads, sometimes for days. Foreigners had to stay in designated hotels. ๐—”๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜†๐—ฒ๐˜€, ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด. ๐—ข๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—–๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฒ, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€. Same seat, same room, pay more because of your face/purchasing power. Bus terminals and train stations were crowded and not safe. Pickpockets were normal. English was extremely rare. ๐—ก๐—ผ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜, ๐—ป๐—ผ ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ, ๐—ป๐—ผ ๐—ฝ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐˜€, ๐—ป๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ. A paper guidebook, a dictionary, and a lot of pointing. Every day was a struggle. So most foreigners did a year or two and went home. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ผ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ-๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€. Not for comfort, there wasn't any. We stayed because you could feel something was happening. ๐—ก๐—ข๐—ช? Now I cross the country on a high-speed train at 300 km/h. On time, clean, booked on my phone in a minute. Same price as everyone else. Pickpockets? I can't remember the last time I heard of one. Blue sky is normal again. The rivers I avoided have parks along them now. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜€? ๐—˜๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†, ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐˜€, ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ผ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น ๐˜€๐˜๐˜‚๐—ณ๐—ณ ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ฟ ๐—ฝ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€. And a foreigner on the street? Nobody turns their head anymore. I pay for everything with my phone. I walk home at 2am and feel completely safe. ๐—œ๐˜'๐˜€ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—น๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—น๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—น ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜†. ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ช "๐—–๐—›๐—œ๐—ก๐—” ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฆ" Now I see new "self-proclaimed China experts" online, doing road trips in a nice SUV. I'm not downplaying them. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜†'๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—–๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜†, ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ช๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€. But it's the easy version. They see the result, not the struggle that built it. Both stories matter. Theirs shows what China is now. Ours shows how far it came. ๐—ช๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—–๐—›๐—”๐—ก๐—š๐—˜๐——? Not the people. ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜† ๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด. Railways, roads, power, sanitation. Hundreds of millions out of poverty. With concrete, steel and very long days. I watched it happen. ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—™๐—จ๐—ก๐—ก๐—ฌ ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง In the 90s the Western press called China dirty, poor and backward. ๐—ก๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—ถ๐˜'๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ป, ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ณ๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ฎ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜. Back then you had to be a hard-core China lover to stay. ๐—ง๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ท๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ.
48
Are all health regulators members of a single world blob? @SAHPRA1
(1/19) ๐Ÿšจโš ๏ธ Unvaccinated Children are Indisputably Healthier โ€” A Thread Vaccine makers and public health agencies flat-out refuse to conduct proper safety studies. But independent research clearly shows the unvaccinated are healthier. ๐Ÿงต๐Ÿ‘‡
62
Creating future patients for big pharma to feed off?
Letโ€™s just quickly dispel the notion that children have gotten healthier as we have increased the number of vaccines they are given.
71
AP Williams ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
ONE MORE TIME FOR THE STUPID PEOPLE The ORIGINAL report on global warming did NOT say man was responsible. FACT The ORIGINAL report findings were changed to say that man WAS responsible. FACT The people who put together the ORIGINAL report said the report was CHANGED. FACT They changed it, like changing global warming to climate change, makes it easier to sell it to you. Any scientist refusing to go along with the scam is DENIED funding. 97% of scientists who were sent the altered paper did NOT agree that man was responsible. FACT The whole idea was to tax you even more. Now the sensible, clever, wide awake people already know this. Those who do not realise this, now you do. #Climatechange #Scam #Tax #planet #Globalwarming #news #newsupdate #newsupdates
7
54
2
94
1,914