Pinned Tweet
WE DID IT ! We just sent the first layer 1 blockchain transaction over lora radio. No internet. no cellular. no satellite.
193 bytes, signed with ed25519, validated locally, on real hardware. @lilygo9 t-beam to lilygo t-beam, 868 mhz, two years of work landing in a single packet.
What does this actually mean ?
The entire crypto industry talks about decentralization and builds everything on top of an internet connection. as if it's never occurred to anyone that a government would cut that connection the second it serves them. @web3privacy has been screaming about this for years. They're right..
580 million people hold crypto. three trillion dollars on chain. all of it depends on a server somewhere being online. wait until they cut your internet. your wallet won't be drained. it'll just be worth nothing.
Arxia removes that dependency at the protocol layer. block lattice consensus. orv stake-weighted voting. crdt reconciliation when partitions reconnect. unique nonce per wallet, signed receiver field, four-tier finality with explicit caps so you always know what guarantee you're holding. 34 of 34 protocol tests passing. fully open source.
What we aim for ? A layer 1 that doesn't die when the network does. a wallet that works in a blackout, a war zone, a kill switch event, a solar storm, a protest where they pull the plug. the blockchain that runs when the internet is dead.
today we proved the radio leg works. next is the mesh, the field deployment, the public testnet, the ido, the mainnet.
@LoRaAlliance
After over a month, here is some well-deserved news!
This is the biggest call we have made since we started. It changes what Arxia can carry and who it can actually reach. We would rather give you the full reasoning than a headline, so this is a longer read than usual.
Here it is.
What Arxia will carry
Arxia is being built as an offline settlement layer. The assets people already hold and already trust can move across a radio link with no internet in sight. Stablecoins. Bitcoin. Money that has purchasing power the day it arrives.
The last stretch of work went into arriving at this rather than defending the earlier plan. A sovereign chain is the more flattering story to tell. It was also the wrong shape for the person we are building for.
Who this is actually for
As a Layer 1, exactly one asset could ever move on Arxia: our own token. Every user would have had to acquire it first.
Picture who that user is. No bank. No connection. No reason to trust an institution that asks for one. Telling that person to go obtain a token before they can receive money from their family is the precise barrier Arxia exists to remove.
We would have shipped the barrier inside the solution.
The scope got bigger, not smaller
The question stops being whether people will adopt our asset. It becomes how much existing value needs to move where there is no connection. Remittance corridors. Humanitarian distribution. Disaster zones where the towers are down and the money still has to arrive.
The engineering reason
A new Layer 1 has to convince people that untested consensus is safe enough to hold their money, and that argument gets harder every time the value sitting on it grows. Anchoring to an established chain borrows security that has already been paid for. It ships sooner, and it is more honest about what we have proven and what we have not.
What does not change
Offline-first in the hard sense. Long range LoRa radio as the default path, not a gateway you have to walk to. Hardware that costs tens of dollars, not hundreds. A transaction that fits inside a single radio packet at the ranges that matter in the field.
If the internet never came back
Everything above still works. This is the part people get wrong about Arxia, so here is the mechanism.
Every account has its own chain, and every transaction carries a sequence number. Spend the same number twice and every node that sees both blocks rejects the second. Two conflicting spends reach the mesh, the nodes in range vote with the stake they can reach, one block survives, the other is gone. A payment can never be received twice, even when two groups of nodes that were cut off from each other meet again and merge what they saw.
None of that touches the internet. It runs over radio between the devices in range of each other. A village with ten nodes and no connection to anything settles its own transactions, and keeps doing so for as long as the batteries last.
The honest part is about size, not about safety. A small payment between neighbours confirms the moment the nodes around it see it. A large one waits until more of the network has seen it, the way a cheque clears on the spot for a coffee and takes longer for a house. How much of the network you can reach sets how much you can move at once. Internet is one way to reach more of it. It is never required for the transaction to be real.
The build
The flash storage layer survives power loss by design. A fault injection suite cuts power at every write boundary, and the ledger comes back byte for byte identical. A node in a village loses power, it comes back, and nothing is gone. That property is the line between a demo and something you can hand to a stranger.
The north star
Real boards, real distance, a transaction settling with no internet in the loop, filmed and published.
To be exact about status: the settlement layer is a direction we have committed to, not code that exists today. We will show it when it runs.
Ask anything in here. We will answer!
1/
Arxia, where we stand. A builder's update.
Two quiet months on this channel. But we're moving more than ever. 🧵
7/
A full website and narrative rebuild is underway.
Sharpening around one truth: every crypto network claims decentralization, but they all depend on an internet connection they don't control.
Arxia removes that dependency.
Claro and Tigo both degraded across five departments after the colombia quake. power cuts, damaged towers, saturated networks, all at once. Arxia was built for exactly this: transactions and messages over lora mesh when the towers are dead.
#tremblor #sismocolombia #CryptoPresale
on july 28 at 16:27 jst a magnitude 7.1 earthquake struck kumamoto prefecture. shindo 7 in uki city and hikawa town. at least 36 dead, roughly 260,000 people under evacuation orders.
within hours, 168 mobile base stations were offline across the prefecture.
japan had prepared for this. on april 1 the five major carriers launched japan roaming: when your carrier's towers goes dead, your phone automatically attaches to a competitor's surviving 4g network. voice, sms, 300 kbps. no registration. this was its first real test.
it worked where at least one carrier was still standing.
around yatsushiro and hitoyoshi, all four were down at once. nothing left to roam onto.
the reason is in the ministry's situation report. ground displacement of up to 3.5 meters along a 27 km section of the futagawa fault sheared the buried fiber conduit and collapsed the poles carrying microwave backhaul. a tower can be powered, intact, undamaged, and still carry zero traffic if its transmission link is cut.
four carriers. separate towers. separate spectrum. separate companies. one shared physical layer underneath.
that is the failure mode worth understanding. redundancy across operators is not redundancy when every operator's last mile terminates in the same trench.
arxia is designed on the assumption that the trench is cut. lora, ble, sms, satellite. consensus that does not require a backhaul link to exist.
not a claim about kumamoto. a claim about what the design has to survive.
PoC v0.5.0. 692 tests passing!
The Arxia team conducted offline transactions between two devices, and it worked! Its Ed25519 signatures over LoRa radio are working.
Double-spend prevention without the internet works. Ledger reconciliation when networks reconnect works. The transaction size is 193 bytes and significantly under the LoRa radio limit of 256 bytes.
This is no longer a promise that exists in our whitepaper. The Arxia team has demonstrated that the tech works, compiles, and passes on x86_64 and compiles for ESP32 (Xtensa). The code is public in our GitHub repository with the tests, and the results are verifiable by anyone.
Building continues. Follow @ArxiaLayerOne to stay updated.
In every post-apocalyptic story, the same thing happens. Society breaks down, and infrastructure fails. The official currency becomes worthless. And within days, something else emerges.
Bottle caps, cigarettes, ration cards and hours of labor. This can be anything that two people can agree on has value and is useful to survive together.
Nobody planned or designed it; it just emerged because the need is fundamental. Crypto was supposed to be different. A designed, cryptographically secure medium of exchange that is censorship-resistant, borderless and trustless.
But when the infrastructure collapses, Bitcoin joins the bottle caps. Equally useless and inaccessible. The question nobody asked when building it is, “What happens when the network itself is the thing that fails?”
Follow @ArxiaLayerOne to stay updated on what we are working on.
Anon doesn't have to mean unaccountable.
We completed solidproof kyc at gold tier, the highest level, full identity and owners business verifications on file.
It stays private unless we ever act in bad faith. You stay safe, we are fully accountable behind the curtain.
@SolidProof_io
#arxia #cryptocurrency
Solidproof audit in: 98.93 %
Contract audited By @SolidProof_io , zero findings at any severity. The token is independently verified before a single dollar moves through it.
Protocol audits come next, staged from testnet to mainnet.
You can check it out here: app.solidproof.io/projects/a…
A person holding $1B in bitcoin can't buy a bottle of water from their neighbor if the internet goes down. not because his Bitcoins are gone. not because of a hack. not because of any cryptographic failure.
simply because there's no network to broadcast the transaction to.
This is the thing crypto never talks about.
Decentralization is a story about censorship resistance. It was never a story about infrastructure resilience.
Those are two completely different problems. One has been solved. The other hasn't.
Arxia is solving the other.
xitter.cf/ArxiaLayerOne/status/2…
Post Written by our community writer @0xCatechist
Alice in Warland
Alice is in a war zone, and the Internet is down. She needs to pay Bob 5 USDC for water.
Here's what happens:
She opens the app. The wallet shows her 100 USDC stored locally on her phone. No server needed. She enters the amount. Scans Bob's QR code. Her phone builds the transaction.
She signs it with her private key. Ed25519. Mathematical proof came from her with no third party involved. The transaction travels phone-to-phone via Bluetooth in an instant with 193 bytes (256 bytes in total).
Bob's app validates it with a correct signature and a nonce never seen before. Sufficient balance. Bob shows +5 USDC. Alice shows 95 ARX.
No internet. No tower. No server. No bank. When the internet returns an hour, a day, or a week later, both phones sync to the global network automatically, and the ledger reconciles itself. Nothing is lost.
Post written by our community writer @0xCatechist
Arxia Network retweeted
CoinMarketCap | Fear and Greed Index
🔹 Sentiment is at 13 – Extreme Fear.
coinmarketcap.com/charts/fea…
Another full-stack dev joined this week. We're splitting the work into smaller tasks across more hands, so things get done right and audited thoroughly before they ship.
his track, in order:
The node application you actually install and run.
permanent on-disk storage.
The first real transaction over lora radio instead of a simulation.
a wallet tool to create accounts and move test funds.
a multi-node network we run ourselves before anyone outside joins.
That's the path to a phased testnet.






