I want to thank Stewart for taking the time to communicate what’s going on at the BOS. He is committed to transparency. He stated on this town hall that he answers to us, not his colleagues or other politicians. He had some great updates. The one we are interested in - the “midnight” software update. According to Stewart. He (& everyone else) is satisfied with the answer given. A “bug” that allowed a “/“ in the file name. Several problems I see with this answer: 1. Stewart is not allowed in that room. All information he receives is from staff. 2. His chief of staff was present in the room & again, stated there was no software update. When we can clearly see there was. xitter.cf/wethepeopleaza1/status… 3. Stewart will not be getting definitive answers until after the election. Because it’s a busy time of year & pulling staff off to answer security questions is unreasonable - my words paraphrasing what he said. 4. Stewart erroneously has decided that since NOVUS doesn’t connect to tabulation there is no risk. NOVUS creates 2 digital images. The old & the new. The touch screen allows the election worker to select the necessary races. But Runbeck provides them with a pre-filled in ballot. The user only needs to select ok. Is this done by a bipartisan team. Pictures captured appear otherwise. In the past, duplicates were printed at Runbeck & left for pick up. The duplicate is never again compared to the original or stored with the original. Has that process changed? What has never been clarified: Does the digital image get uploaded to the EMS or just the machine readable information? We have been told that the duplicate gets scanned into the system. However, in 2022 logs show scanning duplicates AFTER certification. How does a certification happen without all the duplicates in? Printing at Runbeck & picking the ballots up to scan in the system seems highly inefficient to me. Considering the digital image is already produced. Certification was done - all the numbers in, correct? It seems to me that this log of duplicates scanned in a month after the election is an indication the ballot information is loaded to the EMS via USB. Why else would you need to transfer a USB from outside tabulation (duplication station) to inside the room & fix a “bug” that reads the file name. This brings up concerns - the digital duplicate can be anything. There is no way for the worker to know. The physical paper is never matched & compared. Even if they were, there is no way for the county to know what actually got loaded. This process needs very specific answers. Including whether it’s even legal. According to statute & EPM that say they must be done manually 5. Stewart said it took them 2 weeks to troubleshoot the naming issue. There are only so many reasons a file will not load in a system you have used for years. @ParikhClay @PatriotMarkCook are experts, but Ramirez has supposedly been at this a long time. 2 weeks seems unreasonable. Stewart’s chief of staff said a few days 🤔 6. Approximately at the 16 minute mark Stewart mentioned “snafus that have been happening for decades”. Our elections have been stolen for decades via backdoor access, insider threat & glitches. From what I can tell, Snafus” (glitch) are never resolved. Take the 19” ballot image on 20” piece of paper. The “investigation” never did resolve it. There are only so many ways that happens. And instead of taking a deeper look, they let it go on for 3 elections & then decided they needed to buy new equipment. The glitch is the rig. Venezuela programmers have told us they build in the glitch. 1) to introduce an update post certification 2) to switch/add/delete votes & 3) prevent votes from ever getting in. IMO glitches have been a complete failure of security & proper system evaluation because we have people that do not have the expertise to assess it.

@AZgopteam @SurgeShow @AZGOP FOLLOW THE MONEY — ARIZONA HOBBS support is California and Wisconsin, not grassroots AZ donors as she claims. Hobbs is selling AZ to the leftist agenda. The DGA pledged $10 MILLION to keep Katie Hobbs in office. Latest campaign-finance reporting: $14 MILLION spent. That’s 40% above the original commitment. Why are they spending so much, if she leading in the polls? Here are the players: Gretchen Whitmer — DGA Vice Chair Gavin Newsom — DGA Policy Chair DGA’s $4M top Q2 donor is run by Whitmer’s 2022 campaign manager DGA’s $2.26M #2 source, America Works USA, previously put $25K into Newsom’s inaugural fund Arizona voters deserve to know who is financing this operation, where the money is going, and what $14 million is buying. We know she caved to Newsom on windmills and water... What is Whitmer getting? CHECK FOR YOURSELF seethemoney.az.gov