Events Manager for Sawdust 🤘@sawdustofficial. For booking enquiries email [email protected]

Shipley
Joined July 2009
Mathew Bailey retweeted
Mohammed Yousaf is a solicitor in Bradford. He was caught on camera offering to help people fraudulently avoid fines for employing illegal workers. He said he does it "all the time". I've written to the Solicitors Regulator calling for him to be struck off.
237
3,033
59
11,177
126,112
Mathew Bailey retweeted
Man City fans and ex-players keep saying, ā€œThey appealed, so they haven’t been found guilty.ā€ Others ask, ā€œIf they’re guilty, why haven’t they been sanctioned?ā€ Let’s educate them slowly, slowly. An appeal is NOT a declaration of innocence. It is a legal right to CHALLENGE a decision, its findings or the punishment imposed. Man City has been found guilty of 114/115, and the appeal case must be understood according to the actual findings and applicable procedures. An appeal does not automatically erase an adverse decision. Why does the right to appeal exist? To review whether the evidence was properly assessed, the rules correctly applied and the procedures fairly followed. An appeal is a SAFEGUARD against errors, not proof that an error occurred. An appeal can uphold, overturn or modify a decision. It is NOT an automatic acquittal! 99.9% of appeals are ceremonial. The initial decision is never overturned. Like for city, they are likely to get more issues that might modify the first guilty verdict to 115/115 and possibility of expanding the timing to 2026 for more investigations. So, why haven’t they been sanctioned? The timing depends on the applicable rules and the stage of the proceedings. In Man City’s case, the sanction is between Nov and Dec 2026.
20
47
7
209
48,239
Mathew Bailey retweeted
Man City after their appeal....
46
361
36
2,029
694,561
This whopper ā€˜Won’t be silenced’ but has silenced replies on her post… 🤣
I’m ok. Make no mistake: this is an attempt to target political enemies and weaponize federal law enforcement. For ten years, Trump has targeted me with baseless lies and smear campaigns. This is just the latest escalation in his campaign of political intimidation. I will not be silenced.
1
104
Lincoln Lawyer is a superb watch for anyone wanting to binge on a series! #lincolnlawyer #Netflix #series
2
84
This joke is exactly why people still argue about comedy.
37
485
20
4,395
214,157
Mathew Bailey retweeted
The rules not to ride a bike during a marathon were brought in by the marathon cartel to prevent competition
JUST IN: Chinese fitness influencer disqualified from Berlin Marathon, dropped by sponsors after admitting she rode a bicycle during the race to ā€œtake a shortcut.ā€
119
1,308
47
7,809
220,984
Replying to @davemorrow64
@davemorrow64 what a shithouse! šŸ¤£šŸ¤£šŸ¤£ā€¦ Blocked me so I can’t answer his tweet!
1
1
76
These clubs were told first purely because of their pending legal actions.
9
Mathew Bailey retweeted
I have analysed City's overall commercial revenues relative to payments made by ADUG as noted in the independent commission's report (published last week). The following table shows the percentage of ADUG monies relative to overall reported commercial revenue (25/26 estimated):
2
24
1
107
11,818
This could indeed be quite serious for Man City… Lying to HMRC could result in a prison sentence for those involved! #mancity #premierleague #guilty
Some of them will go to prison.
3
2
1,481
Mathew Bailey retweeted
The Met Police weren’t "powerless" when they banned a UKIP march from Tower Hamlets. The Hampshire Constabulary wasn’t "powerless" when they placed a section.34 over Gosport. British police have the power but don’t apply it consistently. That’s two-tier policing.
123
2,231
27
9,390
58,948
ā‰ļøMidweek Sport Special: SHAMCHester City - Where Does This End? šŸ—£ļø @StuWright78 & @The_Mighty_Mojo šŸ“ŗ youtube.com/live/JLrfmlC5-c4…
9
81
4
399
23,086
Good piece. This is often referred to as the ā€œtime-barredā€ matter at CAS. It was about two payments of Ā£15m recorded as Etisalat sponsor income by Man City in 2011/12 and 2012/13, but which were actually paid to the club by an individual named Jaber Mohamed. Man City made a submission to CAS that clarified these were loans made via an intermediary (called Jaber Mohamed) on behalf of Etisalat because it had liquidity issues at the time and could not afford to pay its sponsorship commitments to Man City. They confirmed that the lender in question was fully repaid in 2015 by Etisalat though. Who was that lender? ADUG. Not the CPC. This is a statement of fact made by Man City to CAS. So if AD sponsors could obtain liquidity from the CPC to fund the Man City sponsor contracts, as the CPC explanation asserts, then why was ADUG paying Etisalat’s Man City sponsorship commitments for two years’ running? As for the repayment in 2015… that only came after a settlement with Uefa in 2014 addressing suspicious sponsorship payments. Cleaning house clearly. Just another fact (one of many) that highlight Man City’s ā€œCPC explanationā€ as totally preposterous.
Manchester City may be undermined by evidence they gave to Uefa over mystery broker āœļø @martynziegler and @Lawton_Times thetimes.com/sport/football/…
21
137
7
734
84,403
OMG this is so ridiculous šŸ¤£šŸ˜‚šŸ¤£ just sharing this so you will laugh. IsiDorito obviously has a hilarious sense of humor.
126
1,047
85
5,214
673,419
Mathew Bailey retweeted
šŸ¤– Made with AI
10
54
3
475
9,718
Mathew Bailey retweeted
Ooo.. someone just got their tax bill šŸ˜¬šŸ‘€
36
302
25
1,207
43,475
2
178
3
1,387
22,807