David retweeted
🚨🔔 President Trump is asking everyone to share this, in three days, most people in the United States will have seen the message. This is an idea that should be passed around, regardless of political party‼️
The TRUMP Rules:😎
1. Tenure / No Pension. A Congressman/woman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they're out of office. And no more perks go with them.
2. Congress (past, present, & future) participates in Social Security. All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the American people. It may not be used for any other purpose.
3. Congress must purchase their own retirement plan, just as ALL Americans do.
4. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise at the ok same rate as the COLA for monthly Social Security recipients minus 1% if having a budget balance deficit.
5. Congress loses their current care system and participates in the same health care system (Medicare) as the American people.
6. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people (i.e. NO MORE INSIDER TRADING!!!).
7. All contracts with past and present Congressmen/women are void. The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen/women. Congress made all these contracts by and for themselves.
Serving in Congress is an honor and privilege, NOT a career.
The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators should serve their term(s), then go home and go back to work … not get all kinds of freebies. Term limits of 2 terms and treat them like a regular citizen!
You will need to copy and paste.
I AGREE SO IM SHARING!
David retweeted
Elon Musk: You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech
The side that is restricting freedom of speech you know, that would have been the Hitlers, Stalins, and Mussolinis of the world
They had very strong censorship, very strong restrictions on speech. That’s one of the signs that they’re the bad guys
In fact, a restriction on speech and large government is fundamentally fascist, obviously. So ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it very clear that the left is the side that is against freedom
Freedom of speech is simply one of many freedoms that we should have as a civil society because ideas should win on the strength of their arguments. They should not win because they are suppressed
David retweeted
Elon says money will become obsolete and energy will be the true currency.
Half my timeline understood: "there won't be any currency anymore."
It's the exact opposite.
There will always be a currency. What's going to die is fiat money. And with it, the power of the people who print it.
Quick masterclass on why.
First, what is money?
Money isn't wealth. It's a tool. It has three functions: unit of account (measuring value), medium of exchange (avoiding barter), and store of value (carrying today's work into tomorrow).
At its core, money is a database. It records who produced what, and who has the right to consume what. It's a system for allocating human labor.
And good money has one non-negotiable property: you can't create it out of thin air. Otherwise, it lies.
For centuries, money was backed by something real: gold. Every banknote was a claim on a weight of metal. You couldn't print more than what you had in the vault.
Then we dismantled it, piece by piece.
In 1914, World War I. Countries suspend gold convertibility to finance the war on credit.
In 1933, Roosevelt bans Americans from owning gold and devalues the dollar right after.
In 1944, Bretton Woods. The dollar becomes convertible to gold at $35 an ounce, and every other currency gets pegged to the dollar.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon "temporarily" suspends the dollar's convertibility to gold. That "temporary" measure has now lasted 55 years.
In 1973, exchange rates float. Not a single major currency in the world is backed by anything physical anymore.
Since 1971, the dollar has lost nearly 90% of its purchasing power. US federal debt has grown almost 100x. Housing prices have decoupled from wages. That's not a coincidence. It's the direct consequence of money with no physical limit.
Now, central banks.
A central bank does two things: it sets the price of money (interest rates) and it creates money. Two massive levers, in the hands of a handful of people nobody elected.
When they keep rates too low for too long, they create bubbles, keep zombie companies alive, and push everyone into debt.
When they print, they dilute your savings. The Fed's balance sheet went from roughly $900 billion in 2007 to nearly $9 trillion in 2022. The US money supply grew about 40% between 2020 and 2022. Result: 9.1% inflation in the US in June 2022, 10.6% in the eurozone in October 2022.
Inflation is a tax nobody voted for. And it doesn't hit everyone equally: those closest to money creation (the state, banks, asset holders) get the new money first. Workers and savers get it last, after prices have already gone up.
Now let's reason from first principles.
If AI and robotics produce most goods and services, human labor is no longer the limiting factor of the economy.
So a currency whose job is to allocate human labor no longer has a purpose.
What stays scarce?
Energy.
Every physical good is matter transformed with energy. Every AI is computation, meaning electricity. With enough energy, you extract, you recycle, you manufacture, you reason.
The natural unit of account of a robotic economy isn't the dollar. It's the kilowatt-hour.
And this is where it gets beautiful: energy-backed money is tied to a real, measurable asset governed by thermodynamics. As Elon puts it, governments can print money, but they can't print energy.
No more inflation manufactured by bureaucrats playing with the printing press. We go back to a standard. But this time, not a metal sitting in a vault: the very input of all production.
My prediction: within the next ten years, the fiat monetary system will break. And with it, the grip that politicians and legacy bankers have on money.
Elon is designing the new global economic order. Not a communist system: private property stays central. But capital will flow to those who best allocate energy to create more goods and services. A meritocracy of physics.
That's what will bring us abundance.
Money isn't disappearing. It's becoming honest again.
David retweeted
For everyone complaining about Elon building a flying car instead of ending world hunger
In 2021 Elon offered $6 BILLION to the WFP on the condition that any donation be on a transparent public plan and be able to track how the money would address the crisis
They turned him down
David retweeted
Dear Secretary Bessent @SecScottBessent,
My name is Everett Stern. In 2010 I was a compliance officer at @HSBC. From a back office in New Castle, Delaware, I watched billions of dollars move to drug cartels, sanctioned regimes, and terrorist organizations. The enemies of the United States. I documented it, I escalated it, and when the bank would not act, I took it to the @FBI, the @CIA, and eventually the @SECGov.
The result was a $1.92 billion settlement. At the time, it was one of the largest in American history. It was also about five weeks of the bank’s profit. Not one banker was charged. Not one went to prison.
I paid a different price. I lost my career, my savings, and my place in the industry I had trained for. I was blacklisted. Every door in American finance closed at once. I slept on a camping cot in a 300 square foot apartment because I could not afford a bed, and I waited tables at @PFChangs to eat. I tell you this not for sympathy, but so you understand that I know exactly what it costs to do the right thing in American finance, and exactly how little the system does in return.
I made that sacrifice because I believed it would change something.
Yesterday, your department fined @BankofAmerica $1.2 billion for failing to report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, some of it tied by your own findings to Chinese laundering networks, narcotics, and the southwest border, alongside 475 apparent sanctions violations touching Russia, Iran, and global terrorism. The bank admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act.
Fourteen years after HSBC. A bank with “America” in its name. And once again, not one individual charged.
Secretary Bessent, I want to say plainly what I believe you already know. The fines are not working.
A fine is paid by shareholders, absorbed by the balance sheet, and forgotten by the next earnings call. Bank of America reported earnings this morning. Nobody who set the alert thresholds, nobody who decided the 2024 cease and desist could wait, nobody who chose the backlog over the law will lose a single thing they value. Their lives are untouched. That is the entire reason the behavior repeats.
This is money laundering. This is blood money. Money that reaches a cartel buys fentanyl that kills Americans. Money that reaches a terrorist organization buys the next attack. This country has fought a war on drugs and a war on terror for decades, at enormous cost in lives and treasure, and all the while we have allowed the financing to flow through institutions we charter and regulate. Cut off the money and we win. We have never seriously tried.
There is also a question of equal justice that I cannot let go.
Before I walked into the FBI building to report HSBC, I stopped in front of the Great Seal on the wall and read the words engraved beneath it: “Justice is the defense of our liberty.” I believed that. I still want to. But every day in this country, people go to prison for crimes that are nothing next to moving money for the people who want Americans dead. A suit, a title, and a corporate badge should not be a shield from the consequences that apply to everyone else. If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel’s money should be standing next to him.
I also want to raise something that is rarely said in these conversations. Why has no one inside Bank of America come forward the way I did? The answer is that everyone in American banking knows what happened to me, and to the whistleblowers who came after. The last person who spoke up is the only policy anyone believes. That is a culture problem, and it starts with leadership, in the banks and in the agencies that regulate them.
This is not a political issue. It has spanned administrations of both parties. It is a national security issue, and I am asking you to treat it as one.
Three things would change the math overnight.
Refer individuals for criminal prosecution. Not the analyst in the queue. The executives who set the thresholds and chose the risk. One banker in handcuffs would do more than every fine in Treasury’s history combined.
End “too big to jail.” An institution cannot be too big to fail and too big to jail at the same time. If it is the first, it must be held to a higher standard, not a lower one.
And if Bank of America will not act as America’s bank, review its charter. A national charter is a privilege granted on behalf of the American people. It should be conditioned on not moving money for the people trying to kill them.
Secretary Bessent, you said yesterday that these actions send a clear message that even the biggest institutions are not above the law. With respect, the institution was never the problem. The people inside it are above the law, and they know it. Until that changes, I will keep writing letters like this one, and the next bank will keep paying the next fine.
I gave up everything I had to stop this. I am asking you to use the power you have to finish it.
Respectfully,
Everett A. Stern
HSBC Whistleblower
Founder and Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit
David retweeted
Olympia: 'Trust us, it's only for millionaires.'
Also Olympia: removes the pension protections from teachers and first responders
When someone says 'trust me' and then changes the locks, they're not your friend, they're your landlord.
David retweeted
It was never a “millionaires income tax”.
It was always a way to get an income tax on us all.
Vote YES on I-645 to REPEAL the Income Tax
David retweeted
1️⃣ @GovBobFerguson said no new taxes.
2️⃣ Bob signs new income tax…. “But it only impacts the millionaires”
3️⃣ WA Dems… I know we said millionaires, but “Families can do well off $250,000, so we need to lower the threshold.”
David retweeted
NEW: Democratic Rep Cindy Ryu admits her party plans to lower the threshold on the income tax from millionaires to everyone in WA state & that she wants to tax companies more
She told KUOW, "Let's look at less, about 250,000. Can we live well on$250,000 a year of net income?"
David retweeted
And here you go. She’s already stating she wants to lower the income tax threshold to 250k. BELIEVE HER!!
David retweeted
Pramila Jayapal told Washington voters that repealing the income tax hands the rich a $300 billion tax break. The real number is $11.4 billion.
She also claims I-645 cuts K-12 programs, but the tax hasn't collected a single penny and won't until 2029. She's lying.
Pramila Jayapal's $300 BILLION Income Tax Lie, Debunked
Pramila Jayapal says I-645 gives the rich a $300 billion tax break. The state says $11.4 billion. She's off by $290 billion and hoping you won't check.
David retweeted
Washington Dem Rep Cindy Ryu says what we already know:
‼️”Millionaire” tax was a lie just to pass it.
‼️Dems will reduce income to $250,000.
‼️Note: WA study just came out saying a family needs $280,000 to “live comfortably”.
‼️Their goal has always been to target the middle class!! 😡😡
We MUST Vote:
🗳️ YES on I-645 to repeal the income tax!
Supreme Court Justices Vote FOR:
🗳️ O’Donnell
🗳️ Edwards
🗳️ Bloom
🗳️ Larson
🗳️ Steven’s
@WAGOP @WashingtonSRC @WaHouseGOP @WASenDemocrats @WAHouseDems @washdems
David retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: In a MAJOR mask-off moment, Senate Democrats just REJECTED legislation that would've required photo voter ID and banned stock trading for members of Congress, 53-47
100% OF DEMOCRATS VOTED "NAY"
LET THAT SINK IN. Democrats just voted for VOTER FRAUD and INSIDER TRADING 🤯
Same bill passed the House. In the Senate, it needed 60 votes to advance — but couldn't get there because of Dems
These people do not want what's best for America. VOTE RED IN NOVEMBER 🇺🇸
David retweeted
Replying to @WatcherGuru
Capital gains tax shouldn't exist.
I risk my money. I build the business. I make the investment. I do the work. I take the risk.
So why the hell should the government take a cut of my success?
They risk nothing. They create nothing. They just take.
Parasites. F'en parasites.
David retweeted
Innovation isn't created by government councils. It's created by entrepreneurs, many of whom have been chased on out Washington by your punitive, unconstitutional, anti-business tax policies.
Tonight, I announced I'm creating the Governor's Space Council. We're bringing together leaders in the space industry to identify barriers and opportunities for growth, assess our infrastructure, and provide recommendations to strengthen Washington's position as a leader in the space industry. We have deep roots in the space innovation, and we're focused on the future.
David retweeted
10 Questions about the intentions of the WA State legislature and their unconstitutional income tax
1. If this tax is only for millionaires, why did the Legislature rewrite 11 pension statutes and strip the tax-and-garnishment shield public retirees have had since 1947?
2. Why did they reject an amendment that would have kept public pension and social security retirement accounts off the income-tax menu?
3. If the $1 million floor is a real promise, why did they refuse to lock it in during session - and actually voted against a proposed amendment to do so?
4. Why should anyone trust the “only millionaires” line after Senate Majority Leader Jamie Pedersen called the 2024 income-tax ban a “pie-crust promise — easily made, easily broken”?
5. If the tax doesn’t start until 2028, and is only supposed to be applied to a small number of taxpayers, why is the state creating a WA State IRS— already hired over 100 people targeting up to 300 people just to administer it — and planning $500 millions for enforcement?
6. Why attach an emergency clause to block a referendum if they were confident voters would keep this tax?
7. Why does a married couple get only one $1 million joint deduction but if the same two people divorced they would get one each — and what happens when the next budget hole appears?
8. If they needed to “open the pension account” now, what stops them from taxing a teacher, cop, or state-worker paycheck later?
9. After the legislature actually voted to ban income taxes in 2024, why should we believe the same Legislature won’t expand this one the moment revenue falls short?
10. If the pitch is “you’ll never pay it,” why build a full income-tax machine — auditors, software, liens, and pension access — before a single dollar is collected?
Bonus question:
11. If they were sure this tax is legal and popular, why skip a constitutional amendment that voters would have to approve — and instead pass a tax the 1933 Culliton ruling treats as unconstitutional, then try to get the Supreme Court to rubber-stamp the workaround?
….Vote Yes to Repeal.
David retweeted
WA State made a Promise
17 years ago my business partners and I decided CA was not good for our employees or our business. We looked around for alternative solutions.
WA state came up on our radar with a promise directly on the State Department of Commerce Website.
“We offer businesses some competitive advantages found in few other states. These include no taxes on capital gains or personal or corporate income. We also offer industry-specific tax breakss to spur innovation and growth whenever possible.”
So we moved 40 families up to WA and established roots.
WA state’s economic success can absolutely be attributed to this business friendly approach that brought talent , technology, innovation, entrepreneurs, and jobs from all over the globe. I was thinking about this the other day wondering if I could find a screen shot of that promise the legislature has now trampled on. The interwebs are forever.
Vote Yes on I-645 To repeal the income tax and help Olympia keep the promise it made to thousands of businesses that chose Washington as their home.































