
health science and physical educator, hockey mom, dyslexia/developmental language disorder mom #DevLangDis #DLD
Joined May 2019
- Tweets6.4K
- Following3.4K
- Followers704
- Likes49.6K
Pinned Tweet
Replying to @edwonkkimmy
Would you consider this family that accessed private SPED interventions as giving their child an edge or perhaps helping their child reach their potential? Maybe edu discussions should center around low value practices versus high leverage practices.
tatyanaelleseff.com/breaking…
Beth Netherland retweeted
Having this kind of view coming from a liberal-identified outlet like @TheArgumentMag is what makes this really stand out. For so long, it's only been mainstream and right-leaning outlets that have grappled with choice and inequality this way.
Beth Netherland retweeted
To be clear this has nothing to do with money. Texas spends over $100 BILLION per year on public education. TEFA costs $1 billion. They just don’t want parents who have been failed by the system to have options. The cruelty is the point.
Beth Netherland retweeted
We know that private school choice programs disproportionately enroll students with disabilities. We are at the front end of understanding why so many parents of students with disabilities are turning to choice programs to serve their child’s special needs. @alexanderrusso
Beth Netherland retweeted
Educational open enrollment is a BIG deal and could help a lot of kids! Families feel happier with their school, good schools have an opportunity to grow, and (if you care — I don't, but many do) taxpayer dollars stay in the school system.
Something lost in all the ESA/takeover hoopla in Texas is that educational open enrollement is expanding — my home district of Frisco ISD included.
Even if privatization bothers you, you can support meaningful educational mobility WITHIN the public school system.
(It's an article I wrote last year)
archive.ph/IxyFF
Beth Netherland retweeted
Austin ISD is refusing to cooperate with a state performance review of its spending, according to outgoing Comptroller @DonHuffines.
He is vowing to release the findings with or without the district’s cooperation.
Beth Netherland retweeted
You're fighting to end school choice for over 100,000 kids.
You went to a private school.
You sent your kids to private school.
Senator José Menéndez Issues Statement on Bill Filing for the 90th Legislative Session
San Antonio, Texas - Today marks the first day members are able to file bills for the 90th Legislative Session. In continuing the work for Senate District 26, Senator Menendez filed 61 bills.
Senator José Menéndez released the following statement:
“Today we filed legislation that reflects the needs of the constituents of Senate District 26. During this historic session we have the opportunity to make real, meaningful change. Our team has worked alongside our constituents, advocates, and experts to craft solutions to better assist our community. Some of our bills filed today will ensure public schools are fully funded, increase access to voting, relieve barriers to higher education, expand Medicaid, address affordability for families, and protect our older adults. We will continue to file more bills, including measures for increased affordability of electricity, regulating data centers, ensuring we have humane living conditions for all Texas including those in prisons, increasing clean water access, halting the abuse of flock cameras, and additional support for our communities in need.
As we continue to work on legislative solutions, we invite our constituents to contact our office if they have proposed solutions or any questions on the legislative process.”
Senator Menéndez filed 61 bills this morning, including those listed below:
SB 98 - Enrollment based funding for public schools
SB 99 - Repealing 287(g) program
SB 100 - Protecting our children from bullying in schools
SB 105 - Birth records for individuals experiencing homelessness
SB 106 - Repealing the voucher program
SB 107 - Teacher Retirement System Cost of Living Adjustment
SB 108 - State Employee Cost of Living Adjustment
SB 109 - Medicaid Expansion
SB 110 - Comprehensive non-discrimination
SB 113 - Texas redistricting commission
SB 116 - Banning certain pesticides in public schools
SB 117 - 24/7 prior authorization hotline
SB 120 - Reinstating local control (repealing the “death star bill’)
SB 137 - Free course credit transter in higher education
SB 143 - Decriminalizing homosexuality
#txlege #txed #txenergy
Beth Netherland retweeted
"It’s one thing to campaign against vouchers; it’s another to uproot a program with an existing group of beneficiaries, especially when most Democrats taking over governors’ offices are likely to be working within divided governments."
chalkbeat.org/2026/11/04/202…
Beth Netherland retweeted
Oh. I’d be lectured yesterday by some geniuses on here the Comptroller could just kill this.
Guess not.
“Eckhardt, however, acknowledged the limitations of her office, saying that any big overhaul must come from lawmakers.”
The Democratic vice chair of the House education committee seems confident that there is a path toward killing Texas’ school voucher program.
“I guarantee that program is not going to be untouched.” via @LChurchilll + @JinATX texastribune.org/2026/11/07/…
Beth Netherland retweeted
Emily Hanford’s new reporting on Sold a Story highlights a wild knowledge paradox.
The US created Direct Instruction and mapped the cognitive science of reading decades ago. Other countries operationalized it at scale. Yet American schools still fight against adopting their own breakthrough.
Institutional dogma is a hell of a drug.
time.com/article/2026/11/05/…
Beth Netherland retweeted
Replying to @coachdavis2122
Not the issue you think it is and if Democrats cancel vouchers for the 67,000 low-income families using them and the 27,000 special needs students using them they're going to have to explain why they want these kids stuck in failing schools that don't meet their needs.
University of Texas / Texas Politics Project Poll (June 2026): A poll reported by KXAN found that 58% of Texas voters support creating school vouchers, while 27% oppose them and 15% have no opinion. Support is heavily split by party lines: 77% of Republicans back the idea compared to 36% of Democrats and 56% of independents.
Texas Trends Survey / University of Houston (July 2024): Reported by The Texas Tribune and the Texas Standard, this survey indicated that about two-thirds of Texans (roughly 63% to 67% across urban, suburban, and rural areas) support school voucher and ESA plans. Support rose to 69% when specifically asking about universal Education Savings Accounts (ESAs), and 59% to 64% when restricted to low-income families.
Beth Netherland retweeted
Did you know #developmentallanguagedisorder affects around 7–9% of children, yet often goes unrecognised? Why does awareness matter for teachers, police & youth justice services? Find out in this #MindtheKids with host @DrJaneGilmour & @umartoseeb. bit.ly/47FyWyg
Beth Netherland retweeted
Replying to @MrZachG
Because many in power seem to value adult comfort, status quo and keeping everyone happy more than they value student outcomes. I don’t know what else to conclude.
Everyone in #TXed and #TXLege should read this thread.
Ping @1in5advocacy @FrankelGarion @BrendaHowardMus @matthewladner
Replying to @leo3linbeck
Here is the post by @CodyforTexas:
1/ Teacher pay raises, “vouchers," fully funding public schools: let’s talk about them. Be forewarned, this will be a long read.
In 2018 during my first campaign for state representative, I ran as the anti-voucher candidate—opposed to taxpayer dollars being used to fund private education. My reason for that position, both publicly and privately, was fear of state government being given a potential avenue to regulate private schools at some point down the road. At that time, my own children were in a private, Christian school in Palestine.
Now let’s jump to 2020/2021 when reports began to surface of truly unthinkable things happening in public schools around the state: parents being forcibly removed from school board meetings by police, teachers encouraging their young students to use “preferred” pronouns, gay pride day celebrations, and books teaching young children sexually deviant behaviors in graphic detail. Surely, I thought, this won’t be tolerated by the public education community at large. As more reports began to surface and the cry for “school choice” along with them, I sent a letter to every ISD superintendent in House District 8—over 30 school districts that I represent—urging them to speak out against the insanity that we were witnessing in public schools around the state. I warned them that if the public education community did not police its own, school choice through some form of voucher would be the result. At this point, all four of my own kids were attending public school and they still are to this day.
In January of 2023, I was sworn in to my third term as the 88th Texas Legislature began and the Speaker of the House appointed me to the Committee on Public Education. I had never served on this committee before. Governor Abbott added “parent empowerment” through education savings accounts as an emergency item to our session’s agenda, and I was still extremely skeptical of any program that allowed public tax dollars to be used for private education. I told Governor Abbott this during our first meeting in March. As our hearings began on the Public Education Committee, I resolved to be as objective as possible as I listened to and considered testimony from the public. It was during these hearings that my position on school choice began to change.
For the first time in decades, the Committee held a public hearing on four different bills which proposed various forms of education savings accounts and true vouchers. This hearing lasted for 16 hours nonstop. Testifying one after another were parents and even students detailing how traditional public education simply didn’t work for them. Whether it was a disability, bullying, learning style, or any other number of reasons, they were begging for help. I’ll never forget the testimony from one father whose child was trapped in a failing public school. He didn’t have the financial ability to put him in a private school and the charter schools close to them were full. It was at that moment I realized: if I were that father, I would be beating down the doors of the Capitol to give my child the chance to get a good education through an education savings account, a voucher, or anything else. Also testifying one after another were teachers unions, pro-public education associations, and public school administrators vehemently against these proposals. Their reasons varied to some degree, but the common theme was: “If the legislature would fully fund public schools, then public schools would finally be able to meet the needs of all students.” Most said they would never support a voucher under any circumstance. Some said they would only do so when public schools are “fully funded." So I asked them, “What is ‘fully funded’? What is that amount?” None of them could give me an answer.
Beth Netherland retweeted
Literacy conferences are incredible. The newest research, the top experts, all in one room.
They're also expensive. 💸
Registration. Flights. Hotel. Meals. Easily thousands of dollars.
Most parents, and plenty of teachers, will never get in that room.
So we're bringing the room to you. FREE.
The Parents for Reading Justice Professional Learning Community brings the world's top literacy experts to you every quarter, sharing the latest research at no cost. Ever.
✅ Parents
✅ Teachers
✅ School board members
✅ Legislators
✅ Anyone who cares about kids learning to read
We kicked off in October with Harvard's Dr. Nadine Gaab, and our next world-class guest will be announced soon. 👀
Follow us so you don't miss it. You'll want to be in the room for this one.
Knowledge shouldn't come with a price tag. Our kids can't wait.
#ScienceOfReading #Literacy #Dyslexia #ParentPower @NationalParents @reading_league @DyslexiaIDA
Talk to families that have children who are struggling academically, socially or emotionally, they might have a different opinion on the matter.
1
1
51

































