Very annoying post here. "Aesthetica" did what people often do when attempting to build up a losing high school debate case: He wrote up a massive "spread" of weak or fake points, along with plenty of winks and nudges, to give off a strong impression that his argument—Indian immigrants are BAD!—is correct beyond a doubt. It’s then left to others to show that each one of his points is specious, one by one, and that what he's built up is in reality a false impression based on a lot of individually false claims and completely unjustified assumptions. I have actually looked into #7 and #8: Indian engineers favor co-ethnic hires about as much as Chinese and white engineers do, and non-Muslim South Asians commit no more white-collar crime per worker than whites. Even if some of the peculiarities he managed to find can’t fully be ruled out, the case overall is far, far less impressive than he's made it out to seem. He probably realizes this: he feels the need to mislead because the narrative he wants others to believe won’t stick if he sticks to the facts alone. If you don't like Indian immigrants for religious or racist reasons, just say so! That would be a lot better than this bullshit. A subculture with no epistemic standards has nothing: why would anyone trust us on the things we're actually right about?