
ππ’π―ππ’π«π±π¦π«π’ ππ«π π₯ππ«π±π’π― πποΈβοΈ
@BrazenHisserPresbyterian Python, Shrewdness with Innocence Silliness 'n Sibilance, Hissing, Muttering, Sputtering Venomous Burning Takes, Coils Occasionally Knotted
Lurking in the Tree
Joined May 2021
- Tweets17.4K
- Following369
- Followers816
- Likes48.1K
Pinned Tweet
Reformed Minion π
Lackey to the King of Kings π
Columbine in Christ ποΈ
Loyal Counsel to Young Lions π¦
Exalting the Son of Man in the Wilderness βοΈ
Okay, but this also aptly describes biological males who only decide to "man up" in a LARPy fashion and assert performative signals of masculine aggression counterproductively in defense of retarded causes.
Sigh. Here's a good example of why I find it hard to trust right-wing reporting any more than I would mainstream / left-wing reporting. This unscrupulous tendency to distort, misrepresent, and just plain fabricate things and then to gullibly receive and propagate it.
ABDUL EL SAYED FAILS BACKGROUND CHECK FOR CLASSIFIED SENATE BRIEFINGS
By Jonathan Gregory
Washington, DC - November 8, 2026
Abdul El Sayed has failed the background check required for classified Senate briefings. The denial blocks him from any session that involves sensitive national security information. Officials who conduct the clearances reported that the review did not meet the standards necessary for access to restricted materials. The failure leaves open the question of what specific issues prevented approval.
Senators who receive classified briefings must clear the same process before they can attend. El Sayedβs rejection means he cannot participate in those meetings. The decision places him outside the normal flow of information that other members receive. Americans who expect every senator to qualify for the same briefings now see one individual excluded by the clearance system.
The denial raises direct concerns about what the background check uncovered. Officials have not released the precise reasons but the result itself is public. Voters who supported El Sayed must now consider whether a senator barred from classified sessions can fulfill the full duties of the office. The clearance failure stands as the official record until any appeal produces a different outcome. The standard remains the same for every member of the chamber.
@TrumpNews
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Senators do not go through a background check or security clearance process. They get access to classified briefings by virtue of being elected. No official or news outlet has reported El-Sayed being denied access. He is senator-elect and takes office in January 2027.
foxnews.com/politics/el-saβ¦
nrsc.org/press-releasesβ¦
8
187
Watching "Coneheads" (1993). This movie is such a hilarious commentary on illegal immigration. Beldar is Vikek Ramaswamy's and ofhers' fantasy of the ideal immigrant worker who is superior to Americans. But Beldar's real mission is planetary conquest. Imagine that. π
1
11
324
"The United States of American can no longer solve the employment problems of the rest of the universe!"
β INS Deputy Commissioner Gorman Seedling
Much to be learned from this patriot. π
1
5
57
ππ’π―ππ’π«π±π¦π«π’ ππ«π π₯ππ«π±π’π― πποΈβοΈ retweeted
"The most understanding person who can minister to a woman is another woman."
"The most understanding spouse who a woman can marry is another woman."
Long workday and last night on the road this week. Decided to get supper at Panda Express πΌ and meet one of American's finest young white males laboring as the shift mananger (who the ruling class has effectively oppressed and spat upon for years). Good man. Thank you, sir. π
16
274
I like to think that Not the Bee meant to imply the full extent of what I'm seeing in that picture of Meryl Streep with a lion's mane as Translan. I see Jadis the White Witch being cast as Aslan in the same way she wore his mane going into battle after killing him.
Liam Neeson's reaction to being told that Meryl Streep is playing Aslan is the best thing you'll see all day
notthebee.com/article/liam-nβ¦
There's a space between a healthy measured understanding of "put not your trust in princes" (either whitepilling that they'll deliver the nation or blackpilling that they'll destroy the nation) and doing a extremely cringe Jesus Juke. Stay on the right side of that gulf, friends.
27
393
Gaslighting at its most desperate and pathetic.
If you go to bed on election night and don't know who won a midterm congressional race, that's normal. And if you wake up the next morning and find that a candidate who was behind hours earlier has since pulled ahead, that's normal, too. (via @PolitiFact) to.pbs.org/4zqnWBa
Fellow Christians, please stop uncritically and gullibly propagating such slop apologetic material that's sketchy and dubious. I've spent my adult Christian life having to identify and purge this kind of stuff that I was told from my personal apologtic mental library.
*THE SUN WAS DARKENED. AN EMPEROR TREMBLED. AND A MAN FROM HEAVEN DIED.*
Nearly 2,000 years ago, during the very years in which Jesus Christ was crucified, something extraordinary was recorded in the imperial chronicles of China.
In AD 31, under Emperor Guangwu of the Han dynasty, the sun was eclipsed.
The ancient Chinese record declares:
βIn the day of Gui Hai, the last day of the month, there was a solar eclipse. [The emperor] avoided the Throne Room, suspended all military activities and did not handle official business for five days.β
β History of the Later Han Dynasty, Chronicles of Emperor Guangwu, Year 7.
Imagine the scene.
The emperor of one of the greatest civilizations on earth, surrounded by his armies, ministers, and imperial splendour, was so shaken by the darkening of the heavens that he withdrew from his throne room.
For FIVE DAYS, the affairs of his empire were suspended.
He trembled before Heaven, confessing his own unworthiness.
Then came an astonishing imperial proclamation:
βYin and Yang have mistakenly switched, and the sun and moon were eclipsed. The sins of all the people are now on one man. Pardon is proclaimed to all under heaven.β
β History of the Later Han Dynasty, Vol. 1.
Read those words again.
*The sins of all the people are now on one man.*
*Pardon is proclaimed to all under heaven.*
And there is something still more extraordinary.
An ancient omen text preserved in the Chinese historical commentary contains these amazing words:
βEclipse on the day of Gui Hai, Man from Heaven diedβ.
β History of the Later Han, Astronomical Annals, No. 18.
Now turn your thoughts from China to Jerusalem.
There hangs the Lord Jesus Christ, the eternal Son of God, crucified beneath a darkened heaven.
From the sixth hour until the ninth, darkness covered the land.
The earth shook. The rocks were rent. The veil of the temple was torn in two.
And there, upon that accursed tree, the sins of God's elect were laid upon ONE MAN.
Not an earthly emperor trembling beneath Heaven's judgment, but the King of kings bearing divine judgment in the place of His people.
Not an imperial pardon issued by a frightened ruler, but everlasting forgiveness purchased by the precious blood of Christ.
What extraordinary words to find in the chronicles of ancient China during the very generation of the crucifixion!
Consider the sovereign providence of God.
He who appointed the hour of Christ's death also governs the sun, moon, and stars. Not one heavenly body moves without His decree. Not one emperor reigns independently of His will.
While the kings of the earth trembled beneath the heavens, the Lord of heaven and earth was accomplishing the redemption of His Church.
And the pardon purchased at Calvary would eventually be proclaimed throughout the nations, even to the distant shores of China.
*βThe LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.β β Isaiah 53:6.*
The heavens declare the glory of God.
And history itself unfolds according to His eternal decree.
1
31
1,669
My leader is the brilliant dissident aristocrat I don't have to vote for and warns everyone about the Deep State.
The Star Wars memes are fascinating. The Jedi religion is a good representation of how Boomers made a political formula into a religion. Anakin is born a slave, which is how Boomers view younger generations. Boomers turned standard political questions into sacred moral dogmas which you are not allowed to renegotiate. Count Dooku was an elite insider who understood the system, he was correct about everything, he was a legitimate political dissident, but he was treated as a religious heretic.
Luke Skywalker and Anakin both rebel against the status quo, they are mirror images, but the difference is that when Boomers were young they saw themselves as Luke Skywalker, but after Boomers became the new establishment incumbents, Boomers enslaved younger generations as debt serfs and made it illegal to disagree with their religion. And the Boomer civic religion of multicultural liberalism is propped up to benefit their own material interests.
The entire story is about inheritance, legacy, generational succession, the cycles of how elite networks cultivate young men and pass down their traditions.
Third World mass migration is a huge piece. The Empire is a 90% white ethnostate which rules over a balkanized favela slum of tribal ethnic cartels and swarming hordes of barbarian biomass. The Republic is disgusting and dysfunctional and drowning in Third World trash propped up by a corrupted bureaucracy.
Maybe the most ridiculous element is that Jedi violence is good when it's balanced, Jedi violence is bad when it's emotional. Motivated reasoning all the way down. The outcome is subordinated to empathy, just being a decent human being dudes.
When Boomers were young, they celebrated the rebellion of youth. As soon as they got old, they criminalized it. And they built a religion around denying young men the freedom of self-determination. Anakin is not allowed to find a wife, leave the military, or choose his own destiny. He starts his life as a slave, and then he becomes a soldier, but at no point is he a free man. He simply trades owners. And when he escapes slavery, his courage is condemned.
7
207
I'm not willing to reject the reliability of the narrator in "Beauty and the Beast". (Sorry not sorry, Based Gaston Bros.) However, I am very agreeable to embracing the unreliability of the narrator in Star Wars. The Jedi are the problem. π
The Jedi actually deserved to go extinct. Their entire ideology is inherently antithetical to life itself.
Youβre not allowed to have attachments, show emotion, love anyone, be passionate about anything, or embody really any of the qualities that make a sentient living being a sentient living being.
Anything thatβs life giving is attacked for being associated with the Sith, who would otherwise be completely correct about everything if it werenβt for their over the top cruelty and cartoonish villainy.
The entire core tenets of the Jedi Order almost perfectly match the late-stage liberal fantasy of a world where existential divisions are all papered over and everyone and everything is forcibly dissolved into a universalist soup managed by a supposedly apolitical priestly caste who wield absolute power while lying through their teeth about how theyβre just defenders of democracy.
And like all Liberal orders, the Jedi are so dogmatically committed to the false promise of universalism, neutrality, proceduralism, and βbalanceβ (aka not taking your own side) that they canβt see any existential threats until it is far too late.
1
11
540
General comment on the discourse and the larger issue: there's potential for and actual practice of "grace destroying nature" in the name of "my kingdom is not of this world" etc. rhetoric when it comes to assessments of masculinity and leadership qualities for the pastorate.
I will say more tomorrow, perhaps. But you appear to assume that the church's inability to attract a certain kind of young man is evidence of a failure in the church. But the pastoral ministry has never been defined by its ability to attract men who desire leadership, courage, or responsibility. It is defined by Christ, who calls men to shepherd his sheep.
There are men attracted to positions of authority who are poorly suited for the pastoral office. There are also quiet, studious men who possess remarkable courage and make excellent pastors.
The question is not whether the church can attract strong men according to the expectations of the surrounding culture. The question is whether we are forming and recognizing men who meet the qualifications Christ has established.
The church does not merely need more masculine men in some abstract sense. It needs godly men whose masculinity is shaped by the example of Christ, the Chief Shepherd.
1
8
361




























