Fuck sake 🤣🤣🤣
Another crazy incident in our old house (now sold) - We got visited by an official from the planning department for Bedfordshire Borough Council Why? Because Zoe’s (age 12) toy cafe got reported for illegal trading. I kid you not. We had to show the lady around our property to prove we weren’t running an illegal operation.
A racist attack 🤔
A thug spits on a Transit Bus Driver … and the Bus Driver had enough.
He beats the crap about of the black thug, proving that that punk arse kid isn’t as tough as he thinks he is.
It’s a shame when society has to teach people lessons their parents never did.
I couldn’t find any update on this incident, but we all know the Bus Driver and the transit company would have been sued by the thug, who initiated the confrontation.
This is just an example of what happens when parents DON’T raise their kids right.
I support that Bus Driver for not sitting there and being assaulted!
Brian retweeted
A gardener’s iPad showed she’d won £1.1 MILLION on a Paddy Power game. They paid her £20,265.14 and said the screen was wrong. Four and a half years later, a High Court judge ruled the screen was right.
– Corrine Durber was a gardener from Gloucestershire, England.
– In October 2020 she was playing a Paddy Power game called Wild Hatter on her iPad. It combines a fruit machine with a wheel-of-fortune bonus round.
– She won the first stage, moved to the next level, and spun the jackpot wheel.
– The screen showed the “Monster Jackpot” of £1,097,132.71.
– She took a screenshot.
– Paddy Power paid her £20,265.14, the amount for the smaller “Daily Jackpot,” and gave no explanation.
– She complained to the company the same evening.
– Paddy Power said a programming error had made the screen show the wrong prize. Its random number generator, it said, had only selected the Daily Jackpot.
– Its terms and conditions said the generator’s result was final and that it wasn’t liable for system errors.
– That was the whole problem. Paddy Power wrote the game, ran the software that picked the result, wrote the rules, and then decided which number counted when its own screen disagreed with its own system.
– A prediction market doesn’t work that way. There’s no house writing the game or choosing the result afterward.
– You trade against another person at a price someone actually agreed to, and your payout comes from the person on the other side, not from a company deciding the number on your screen was a mistake.
– She sued for breach of contract.
– In March 2025, Mr Justice Ritchie granted summary judgment in her favor, so there was no full trial.
– His 62-page ruling found that human error in mapping the game’s software caused the on-screen result to differ from the generator’s. It affected 14 plays over 48 days.
– The judge said customers expect the house to pay if they bet on number 13 and the ball lands on 13.
– He found the terms unfair and unenforceable under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, and not part of her contract.
– He also said it was unfair to place all the risk on the consumer for the company’s own errors, negligence, and inadequate testing.
– She said the judge confirmed she had “fairly and squarely won £1 MILLION.”
– She said Paddy Power had “tried their very best to deny me my rightful winnings.”
– She said she would never bet with them again.
A gardener hit £1.1 MILLION on her iPad, was paid £20,000 instead, and spent four and a half years in court proving the screen was right.
Brian retweeted
There is something deeply satisfying about watching the giant fog machine fail.
A judge does something absurd, dresses it up in the language of compassion and theory, then discovers that an American Senate hearing is one of those inconvenient places where someone may actually read the words aloud and ask what the hell they mean.
No euphemisms. No activist jargon. No institutional shrug.
You wrote it. You defended it. Now explain it in public.
More of this. Much more.
Animals behave better and protect their young
Any parent who is already in a place of safety, yet chooses to risk crossing the Channel to another place of safety, raises serious questions for me about their responsibility as a parent.
But watching this footage is something else.
You can clearly see a father holding onto his child in the water. He tries to get the child onto the dinghy. When he realises he cannot, he leaves the child behind in the water, wearing only a lifejacket.
That child could have drowned.
A parent’s first responsibility should be protecting their child. Not saving themselves and leaving their child behind.
And then we are expected to believe that everyone making these journeys will automatically respect our laws, our country, our women and our children?
Respect is earned through actions.
And what I see in this footage raises some very serious questions.
🤣🤣🤣
This conversation is over.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The video is AI-generated, not a real street interview or conversation, with garbled dialogue, repetitive elements and visual inconsistencies matching documented synthetic clips.
aap.com.au/factcheck/auss…
aap.com.au/factcheck/ai-e…
nytimes.com/2025/12/08/tec…
forbes.com/sites/technolo…
Brian retweeted
These people are vile.
They go out of their way to try and destroy people for not wanting to speak about politics or having the same opinions as them.
You’re damned if you do and damned if you don’t.
Regardless of anyone’s viewpoint, we should be able to say we don’t want to speak politics at work.
He’s a singer, people pay to hear him sing. That’s his job, that’s what he wants to do, not politics. That’s fair enough.
Also, we’re allowed to disagree without being made the villain or being cancelled.
The woke left are full of bullies. They talk about being kind and inclusive, they are far from it. Only if you say what they say and think how they do!
👇👇👇
THE DAY I BECAME A FULLY-FLEDGED RACIST NAZI
I didn’t discover I was a racist Nazi from a history documentary. I found out from Sean on Facebook.
It started when I said the government should live within its means. That was apparently my radical right-wing manifesto.
Sean, who has a Palestinian flag, a rainbow flag and “Be Kind” in his bio, immediately replied: “Typical right-wing Nazi.”
I stared at my phone. I was drinking coffee. I’ve been called many things over the years, but apparently Nazi is now on the list.
Then I made it worse. I said I wasn’t sure men should compete against women in women’s sport. Within seconds, people I’d never met were calling me a Nazi, fascist and bigot.
By lunchtime, I’d become a Nazi for believing Britain should control its borders, children shouldn’t have unrestricted access to TikTok, the government shouldn’t keep spending money it doesn’t have and someone’s race shouldn’t determine their rights.
Apparently, that last one was particularly dangerous.
Say everyone in Britain should be equal under the law and suddenly you’re a racist, colonialist and extremist—personally responsible for everything the British Empire ever did.
Ask whether dividing people by race or ancestry is really a good idea, or why we can’t have one set of rules for everyone, and watch the Facebook experts arrive.
I went to the shops wondering whether anyone would recognise my jackboots. It turns out they were just my old work boots. Bit disappointing, really.
Outside Tesco, Karen from the local activist group was collecting signatures demanding the government boycott Israeli products. She asked if I’d sign.
“No.”
“Why not?”
“Because I don’t think Britain needs to involve itself in every conflict on the planet.”
“So you support Israel?”
“No. I said I’m not signing your petition.”
“So you don’t support Palestine?”
“I support innocent people not being murdered. I just don’t think signing your petition outside Tesco is going to solve the Middle East.”
She stared at me. “You’re one of those far-right people, aren’t you?”
And there it was. I’d gone from buying milk to being a far-right racist because I wouldn’t sign Karen’s petition.
Yep. Definitely jackboots.
Last time I checked, Nazis were into dictatorship, invasion and mass murder—not asking why the government can’t balance the books, whether borders should exist or whether everyone should be treated equally.
My generation grew up knowing what real Nazis were. They weren’t people who wanted controlled immigration or questioned government spending.
They were murderous tyrants responsible for some of the worst crimes in human history.
Now the word apparently means “person on Facebook who disagrees with me.”
That’s the problem: when everyone is a Nazi, nobody is. When everyone who questions something is called racist, the words stop being descriptions and become meaningless insults.
The first time someone calls you a Nazi, you wonder what you’ve said. The fiftieth time, you think: “Oh, is it Tuesday already?”
They think it’s a nuclear weapon. It isn’t. It’s a water pistol—and they’ve used it so often there’s nothing left in it.
So go on. Call me a Nazi. Call me a racist. I’m having a badge made:
“OFFICIAL RACIST NAZI—ASKS QUESTIONS.”
I’ll wear the bloody thing while I put the kettle on. 🇬🇧
