British Army Veteran. Fuck pronouns. Fuck Digital ID. Fuck the left and @UKLabour. The enemy is within. Be prepared. Voting Restore Britain. 🇬🇧🇺🇸
Global
Joined November 2024
- Tweets46.7K
- Following3.9K
- Followers3.3K
- Likes44.1K
Brother52 retweeted
Inexperienced MP who has never worked in business or outside of the public sector asks the Secretary of State who is a convicted fraudster to explain why endless taxes, the worlds most expensive energy and punitive workplace regulations have put Poundland out of business.
Brother52 retweeted
The AndyWave will be the most devastating one yet. Nobody voted for this magnitude of betrayal.
Brother52 retweeted
Tan Ikram is the Deputy Chief Magistrate.
He is linked to an organisation that dismissed the rape gangs as “so-called grooming gangs”.
I do not make a habit of criticising judges, but his conduct outside the courtroom raises serious questions.
So I asked the Justice Secretary for an investigation.
His response was to tell me to stop my "dangerous public criticism".
I will not be silenced.
Brother52 retweeted
Right. Just so we’re all clear.
Farage and Reform tried to put me in prison because I backed the mass deportation of Pakistani child rapists and their foreign wives/relatives who allowed it to happen.
My home was raided by armed police late on a Friday night as a direct result of Reform’s allegations. My guns were seized. They tried to ruin my life. In every way.
Farage admitted on national television it was all because I backed mass deportations.
He said that was the moment they realised they ‘had to get rid’ of me.
Not the bullshit allegations they went to the police with, but the fact I want the Pakistani rapists removed from our country.
He admitted it.
That all happened.
Fair enough. I took it on the chin, and planned out our next step.
I founded Restore Britain to give the British people the democratic option to agree with me.
Restore Britain will, without apology, deport every last foreign rapist and all foreign accomplices who knew it was happening, yet failed to act.
If that means entire communities go, that means entire communities go. I really don’t care.
We will rid Britain of that cancer.
Now Reform are incandescently angry that we are giving the British people that choice.
Deploying increasingly desperate smears against our movement.
If people don’t agree, they can vote for someone else who won’t deport. There are plenty of options - Reform, Labour, Tories. Take your pick. Go for it.
But if you want those evil scumbags out of our country, along with every foreign coward who enabled it?
You now have that genuine option.
Restore Britain.
Brother52 retweeted
What they mean by this is that if you oppose the Great Replacement, they will raid your house, confiscate your devices and put you in prison for memes in a private group chat that were sent 9 years earlier.
You may look at this anti-white girlboss and laugh, but I can tell you the laughing stops when types like her are wearing a judge's robe and you're sitting in the dock.
In the EU, we have strong anti-discrimination laws.
So we need to enforce them. Anti-racism becomes real only when it is enforced.
🔗Our strategy: link.europa.eu/XBJ84X
Brother52 retweeted
Be aware … this is just another UN policy being implemented in Britain under Labour.
charities can now apply to sponsor ‘refugees’ to settle in Britain.
The UN’s 2018 Global Compact on Refugees, explicitly promotes community sponsorship, education and employment pathways… exactly what Labour had announced.
They are just doing as they are told ‼️
Brother52 retweeted
When a right-wing party next gains power, it must destroy the charity sector in its current form.
A lot of charities are not what the general public imagine a charity to be. This is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to charities working against the interests of the British people.
Brother52 retweeted
Black Scottish population
1991: 6,353 people (0.13% of the population)
2001: 8,025 people (0.16% of the population)
2011: 36,178 people (0.72% of the population)
2022: 65,414 people (1.20% of the population)
Why is it we're hosting black history month in Scotland?
What history?
Brother52 retweeted
I believe their CEO and trustees should face corporate manslaughter charges if someone they take in goes on to murder someone.
Charities are expressly included under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007.
Brother52 retweeted
Thinking about my friend and our @SaveEuropeAct co-founder @MartinSellner_ who is currently being kept in a cell tonight at the airport in Paris before they’ll deport him back to Austria tomorrow.
He did nothing wrong. Broke no law. This is purely because of who he is and what he stands for.
And mind you, he’s an Austrian citizen who travelled within the Schengen zone, meaning there shouldn’t even be border checks.
This is all premeditated. They knew he was flying into Paris this morning. They knew they wouldn’t let him in, but they let take the flight anyway to then stop him at the border and have him spend the night in a prison cell.
It’s all one big humiliation ritual. This is how they treat White patriots in Europe who are a little too successful at spreading the truth.
Brother52 retweeted
Um usuário português do Twitter causou alvoroço na internet com um texto incomparavelmente preciso: "500 milhões de europeus esperam que 300 milhões de americanos os protejam de 120 milhões de russos que não conseguem derrotar 40 milhões de ucranianos, e ao mesmo tempo nem se dão conta de que estão sendo conquistados por 2 bilhões de muçulmanos que alegam ser perseguidos por 9 milhões de israelenses!"
Brother52 retweeted
Angry Rob’s had enough of the Marxist running the show and the right still arguing over who gets the bigger chair.
Burnham’s numbers are climbing. Labour are already sniffing a winter election. And the response from the people who are supposed to stop it is still more ego than plan.
Badenoch. Farage. Lowe. Sit down. Sort it. Or watch the country get handed back to the same lot who opened the borders, covered the grooming gangs, and spent years telling English people they’re the problem.
You don’t get to keep splitting the vote while the left finishes the job. The longer this carries on, the less there is left to fight over.
Unite or lose. That’s the choice. Everything else is noise.
My England for the English.
England. True Grit. Restore.
No apologies. No surrender.
Brother52 retweeted
The ShabanaWave begins. Disaster will ensue.
The Home Secretary has given a motivated cabal of open border activist groups, masquerading as charities, the right to bring migrants to Britain.
Brother52 retweeted
I almost never watch any of the mainstream channels, BBC, ITV, Channel 4, Channel 5, or Sky, apart from the obvious football. I usually keep GB News on. Every so often, however, I check those channels, and each time I am struck by what appears to be clear and overt anti white racism. The programming is dominated by Black and Asian faces, by gay representation, while the only white people who appear are ginger or are predominantly cast in the incompetent or failure roles. It has grown steadily worse. That is precisely why I am content to be equally racist in return. These people spent years complaining about tokenism, yet they are now silent. I hope that at least 90% of them are one day deported or held in purpose built camps. I do not care who agrees, our country has been invaded and that process needs to be reversed. Those who facilitated such an invasion I hope will one day be tried, convicted, and never see the light of day again. #BAVG
Brother52 retweeted
I don’t think this has had the press coverage it deserves. It is insane.
The right to decide who enters Britain belongs to the British state, not to whichever charity has the Home Office’s ear.
The opportunities for favouritism, nepotism and corruption are obvious. A well-connected individual with well-placed supporters will secure nomination over others facing greater persecution. Dodgy intermediaries may well demand money from families seeking sponsorship. Charities could become vehicles for bringing over relatives, associates or even political allies. It risks creating an entire system of private patronage.
I go into all this in more detail here: thecritic.co.uk/labours-gold…
Brother52 retweeted
For a Labour Chancellor to declare during a Scrooge Budget in which a painful year is promised to his own people that he had “made the day” of a foreign leader by handing him an EXTRA £10 Billion desperately needed at home is such a cognitive dissonance as to be scarcely believable. That NOBODY in the House protested renders it a rubber-stamp assembly of a kind simply unrecognisable to a long-standing parliamentarian like me.
Brother52 retweeted
🚨 Angela Rayner is expected to appoint an “Islamophobia tsar” by the end of this week, to help enforce the Government’s “anti-Muslim hostility” definition — Islamophobia by another name.
As the Free Speech Union warned from the outset, the definition has been used to silence people who criticise, debate or mock Islam. Those targeted include politicians such as Shadow Justice Secretary @NJ_Timothy, @RupertLowe10 and Reform UK’s @RobertJenrick, as well as private citizens.
It is a state-approved Islamic blasphemy code.
Earlier this year, FSU Policy and Research Director @DavidRoseUK exposed troubling connections between Islamist organisations and all five individuals the Government hand-picked to sit on the working group that drafted the definition.
Now the Government is refusing to say which organisations took part in the consultation that shaped it. @NJ_Timothy submitted a Freedom of Information request and was initially told that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government had deleted every submission — in apparent breach of the Government’s own data policy.
The Department later admitted that it does hold the responses, but it still refuses to say which organisations or individuals took part and influenced the definition.
What is the Government covering up? Did Islamists help to create a state-approved blasphemy code? @AngelaRayner has serious questions to answer.
On Tuesday, the Prime Minister met Muslim community leaders in Downing Street and told them: “We want to counter any form of hatred, discrimination, Islamophobia, wherever we find it.”
Sitting next to him was Akeela Ahmed, one of the five members of the working group. In 2018, she called for the Islamophobia definition published by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims to have “legal power” so that it could be “implemented by the government and the police”.
She later told MPs that Islamophobia “cannot simply be reduced to or restricted to hate crime”, complaining that a columnist could write about a “Muslim problem” without it being treated as Islamophobia, “or simply being seen as free speech”. She also wanted the definition to cover “microaggressions during school runs”.
All of this considered, there is little reason to hope that whoever becomes tsar will be good news for free speech.
Among the frontrunners is Sayeeda Warsi, the former Conservative Party co-chairman and now a crossbench peer. She has refused to distance herself from extremists, claiming that doing so would be “playing by the rules set by the racists”, and has said that the term “Islamist” is “often a fig leaf used by Islamophobes to disguise their bigotry”.
The FSU has launched a legal challenge to stop this definition. Parliament abolished the blasphemy laws in 2008; we will not allow a new one to return under a new name.
Help us stop an Islamic blasphemy law in Britain 👇
The name of the government's highly-controversial 'special representative' to oversee its equally controversial definition of 'anti-Muslim hostility' will be announced this week, ministers told Muslim groups at Downing Street yesterday.
I understand that the shortlist of 12 includes, though is not limited to:
Some of these names have, to say the least, questions over them. Asim, for instance, was sacked as an adviser to the last government after calling for a film about the Prophet Mohammed's daughter to be banned. And the definition itself, as I and others have previously argued, is deeply sinister.
In the hands of some of these people, it could be weaponised to do really serious harm.
✍️ Andrew Gilligan
Article | spectator.com/article/sayeed… | @mragilligan
