Jimmy Bubs

Hasan is the fucking goat. Streaming for over 200k people. This man is so much more than just a twitch streamer, I hope he knows that. Genuinely a revolutionary leader that history textbooks will write about for centuries to come. What a streaming day!!!!!

there's genuinely not a single non-politician who's done more for the democratic party this year

my stance on the burntpeanut and @DeadbyDaylight / @Behaviour situation. truly wish they would have vetted him before hand. i'm so disappointed.

Mao Zedong is the most lied about historical figure of all time and it’s not even close. I’m glad Kylian Mbappe being an ignorant shitlib opened up this global conversation and discourse on him. The genocidal west will never forgive Mao for liberating his people from them while helping anti colonial struggles all around the world

Many of you don't understand how serious this is, so let me break it down. In computer science there is a famous kind of puzzle called 3-SAT. You are given a long list of yes-or-no switches and a set of rules about how they must be arranged, and you have to find a combination that satisfies every rule. The obvious way to solve it is to try every combination, but each new switch doubles the number of possibilities, so a puzzle with a few hundred switches would take longer than the age of the universe to brute force. For decades, the smartest people in the field found clever tricks that made this a little faster, but every trick still hit the same wall: the time required kept exploding as the puzzle grew. About 25 years ago, two computer scientists, Russell Impagliazzo and Ramamohan Paturi, working with Francis Zane, turned that wall into a formal idea. They proposed the Exponential Time Hypothesis, which says this explosion is not a failure of human cleverness but a law of nature. No algorithm, however brilliant, will ever solve 3-SAT without the time blowing up exponentially. Nobody could prove it, but almost everyone believed it, and it became one of the foundations of modern computer science. Researchers used it as a measuring stick. If you could show that solving some other problem quickly would also crack 3-SAT quickly, you had shown that problem was hopelessly hard too. Hundreds of papers, across scheduling, graphs, logic and much more, rest on this one assumption. Now an internal AI model at OpenAI claims to have broken it. It says it found an algorithm that solves these puzzles meaningfully faster than the hypothesis allows, and it has checked the proof in a computer verification system called Lean. And here is the remarkable part: the very people who proposed the hypothesis, Impagliazzo and Paturi, along with MIT's Ryan Williams, are now leading the public review of whether a machine has disproved their own idea. So what happens next? If the disproof holds, a large part of theoretical computer science has to be revisited. Every result that said "this problem cannot be solved faster, assuming ETH" loses its foundation, and researchers will have to work out which of those walls were real and which were simply where we stopped looking. It does not mean everything becomes easy. The new algorithm is still slow in absolute terms and this is not the famous P versus NP problem being solved. But it means our map of what is possible was wrong in a place we were very confident about, and it was an AI that redrew it. If the disproof fails, the hypothesis survives and the field breathes out, but we will still have watched an AI produce serious, checkable work on one of the deepest questions in the discipline, closely enough that the founders of the idea had to take it seriously. Either way, something has shifted.

Hasan Piker on the realities of entering the world of electoral politics and now being perceived as a threat by the establishment wing of the Democratic Party: "I know for a fact that if I stayed the fuck out of electoral politics, if I never went and interviewed Zohran, if I never went and campaigned with Abdul El-Sayed, if we never unseated numerous incumbents this cycle, this would not be an issue. With @MaiForUs, we have another opportunity to unseat another incumbent. In less than two years, I went from being invited to the fucking DNC to being considered public enemy number one, to being considered worse than the Republican Party. The way that these guys talk about me, you'd think I'm more powerful than the president and also worse than the president. The fucking fascist president. All this stuff that they're complaining about was out there before I went to the DNC. The reason why it became a problem for everybody, including the Democrats, is because we started winning power. That's it. We started winning power. We started defeating shitty incumbents. We started pushing loudly and boldly for Medicare for All, for anti-genocide. That's it. That's why they're freaking the fuck out."

i love doing what i do.

Sam Seder's face while Neera Tanden was trying to explain her alternative to a comprehensive, public universal healthcare plan. She is jumping through hoops trying to defend privatization of healthcare, while claiming that Abdul El-Sayed agrees with her on this. 😭

I will give it to Neera Tanden: She does really well in debates. I’m not saying she makes good points, I’m saying she’s mastered the bloodsport of it all: not letting her opponent get a word in edgewise, leading the conversation to where she needs it to go, and often seemed to have Mehdi and Sam on their back heel at times. This is an excellent metaphor for the left movement and how it shares its ideas. Our messaging is often forced into defending niche policies, not attacking the failures of the current system.

Thank you to everyone who stood with me over the years. It’s been a scary journey but I have always been grounded in my work and ability to provide exemplary service to my constituents. Trump and his administration have been after me since I arrived in Congress. I have always stood up to him and that will never change. The pedophile protector will never silence me.

I keep hearing people say Islam doesn't belong in the West. But have you ever stopped to ask what the West would look like without the contributions of Muslims? 1979 — Abdus Salam: A Muslim physicist who won the Nobel Prize in Physics while working at Imperial College London. 1999 — Ahmed Zewail: An Egyptian-born scientist working in America who won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his groundbreaking research into chemical reactions. 2017 — Akhlaq Choudhury: A British Muslim appointed to the High Court of England and Wales. NASA — Tahani Amer: An Egyptian-born American Muslim engineer who has worked at NASA. Different professions. Different achievements. Scientists, engineers, judges and innovators. These are not people asking the West for permission to exist. These are people whose work has contributed to the societies in which they live. Now imagine these people never existed. Imagine the discoveries never made, the scientific breakthroughs never achieved, and the contributions never given. And you still want to tell me Muslims don't belong in the West? You don't have to agree with Islam. But since when did disagreement with a religion become a reason to deny the people who follow it their place in society?

Islam is way ahead of many modern US states in 2026. Child marriage is forbidden in Islam since the very beginning.

Me: Shane Gillis's comedy is harmful and not funny Them: It's not for you Me: Yes, but it's about me Being the target of harmful jokes makes it for you AND about you. I'm a woman and I have a daughter. Shane Gillis being offensive toward women is very much my business.

don't do this small bean thing when someone responds perfectly cordially to you I work for a millionaire? most people do. your opinion on what zohran ran on does not matter, he made a campaign promise and that is fact.

i take this back, fully retract it, and i apologize for how i phrased this. i posted this while angry at the constant barrage of years of my life witnessing senseless murder in palestine, and this is no way to express my opinion, which is an end to all conflict in the region

She was in the lDF, so no, she’s not a “civilian target”.

Genuinely love that her legal team didn't release these tapes until later on. Gave the loser rapists enough time to put their foot on their mouth just to be met with real evidence of their lies. Losers online still doubling down, shows it was never about the facts.