C.Meij retweeted
Angstaanjagend hoe weinig mensen financiële informatie en tabellen kunnen interpreteren. Zelfs met de hele uitleg in de tabel erbij… Het nieuwe #belastingplan2027 en de #miljonairstaks strooien iedereen zand in de ogen mbt het nieuwe box3 stelsel dat ingaat in 2029 (?), waarin iedereen grof meer belasting gaat betalen; ook mijn tante Corrie die wat geld achterhoudt voor later.
Omdat mensen zo slecht kunnen lezen, hier het artikel, met uitleg en een makkelijk rekentool.
debelegger.nl/post/nieuwe-bo…
Our co-founder Max Kantelia was at the Ethereum Institutional Forum in London this week, with banks, fund managers and market infrastructure players.
His takeaway: talks with institutional leaders confirmed the market need for vLEIs, so verified institutions can transact with each other safely and fast.
Zilliqa: one network, verified participants, settled on Ethereum. 🖤
C.Meij retweeted
It feels like things are heading in a totally unexpected direction—in a good way. That's really interesting, and bringing AI into the mix will probably speed things up even more.
Before a counterparty accepts a transaction from an AI agent, it has to know which legal entity stands behind it, what the agent may do and who answers if it goes wrong. A wallet address can’t say. A vLEI can.
Zara’s vLEI will come through @ltin_li, which is in the process of becoming a qualified vLEI issuer (QVI). It will state that she acts for Zilliqa and within which limits, and it can be revoked at any time. Every transaction she signs will trace back to us.
Now: Zara advises us on which agents to build, and in what order.
Next: the first vLEI for an AI agent on the Zilliqa Layer 2.
Then: more Zilliqa agents, each with a human owner, a vLEI mandate and limits it can’t exceed.
The full job description: zilliqa.com/agents.html
MegaETH (@megaeth) is rebranding to MEGA and moving beyond infrastructure: the L2 becomes one project in a holding focused on an open market for AI inference.
Blockchain alone is becoming a commodity. Value moves to products built on top. We’re asking ourselves the same question with Zara and the agentic economy. What do you think? Comment please👇
Would be interesting to explore partnership opportunity "vLEI verified inference provider”
mega.holdings/whitepaper
We didn’t always deliver what you deserved, so we’re changing how we work. The goal is to be the first AI-native blockchain company.
People set the strategy and write the mandates. Our head of AI agents works out which agents to build and in what order. Those agents take on the operational work step by step, such as reporting, monitoring and compliance checks.
Every agent has a named person who answers for it. An agent that can’t show what it’s worth doesn’t get built.
ZIL: the token of the first AI-native blockchain company.
C.Meij retweeted
$zil survived the nuke and bounced well. Leading the market in reversal as always. Might be a safer bet than bitcoin omg 🚀
We gave the job of leading our AI agents to an AI agent.
For now it comes with opinions and no permissions.
Her name is Zara, and her goal is to be the first AI agent on the Zilliqa Layer 2 with a vLEI, a verifiable ID that proves which company she acts for and what she’s allowed to do. 🧵
C.Meij retweeted
Wat een dag!
76 tegen 74. Het kabinet-Jetten ontraadt schriftelijk een eigen belastingvoorstel. @D66 en @cdavandaag stemmen het er vervolgens doorheen. VVD stemt tegen. En de @MinPres komt met een 'serieuze herstart'.
Ongekend. Herstart van wat?
Je zou er bijna kaartjes voor kopen. Ware het niet dat de belastingbetaler dit complete circus al had betaald, het circus waar zelfs regeringspartijen niet meer naar hun eigen regering luisteren.
De @VVD vindt de gang van zaken onacceptabel. Alleen kennelijk niet "onacceptabel genoeg" om de stekker eruit te trekken. Iets met "ministerposten" en de rust in hun portemonnee wellicht, en VVD-minister Heinen mag vervolgens zorgdragen voor wetgeving waar zijn eigen fractie tegen stemde.
En nu wil @RobJetten het coalitieakkoord mogelijk herzien. Fantastisch.
Dezelfde partijen die hun bestaande afspraken niet overeind weten te houden, gaan nieuwe afspraken maken over hoe ze zich voortaan aan hun afspraken gaan houden.
Dit kabinet verdient geen herstart.
Dit kabinet verdient een vernietigend oordeel.
Aan de stembus.
#belastingplan2027 #klucht #herstart
nos.nl/liveblog/2639007-twee…
C.Meij retweeted
◆ Zilliqa ( $ZIL ) Technical Analysis: Descending Channel Continuation and RSI Bullish Divergence
Zilliqa on the weekly timeframe continues to trade within a established descending channel structure, pressing toward critical historical accumulation bounds.
While price action prints lower lows along the descending price channel, the RSI indicator forms higher lows along an ascending diagonal support line. This configuration confirms a classic bullish divergence on the macro scale, signaling weakening downside momentum despite ongoing corrective pressure. Sustaining this momentum structure near foundational baseline levels remains key for potential trend reversal setups.
⚠️ Not financial advice.
#ZIL #Zilliqa #Crypto #TechnicalAnalysis #Web3
C.Meij retweeted
$zil not much to report, bullish correction and shaking out the weak hands. buying the dip here 🚀 $1 soon 💰
Stop directing liquidity toward useless projects. Bring fresh capital into Zilliqa (ZIL)! 🚀
Zilliqa's new Ethereum Layer 2 vision positions it to compete in the same space as Arbitrum.
We believe in Zilliqa's potential, support its development, and stand behind its future. 👇
C.Meij retweeted
🔎 It’s #ChainWatchThursday, and what’s next for @zilliqa as it moves in a new direction after nine years as a standalone Layer 1?
🏗️ Zilliqa has announced plans to become the Zilliqa Institutional Layer (ZIL), an Ethereum Layer 2 designed for regulated institutions. The decision follows years of limited network usage, declining funding and liquidity for standalone L1s, and the growing security demands of operating an independent chain.
🏦 The new network will focus on institutional settlement secured by Ethereum, with identity and compliance built in through verifiable Legal Entity Identifiers (vLEIs). It will also support a permissioned market where verified institutions can trade, with access for individuals and AI agents planned for a later stage.
🤝 As part of the transition, @ltin_li, Liechtenstein’s state-backed trust network, will operate the sequencer and become a qualified vLEI issuer. Zilliqa also says it will retain its existing partnerships, community and ZIL token as it moves towards this model.
🔗 This marks a significant shift in Zilliqa’s direction, from operating its own Layer 1 to building Ethereum-secured infrastructure for regulated institutional markets. ZIL holders do not need to take any action today, and the team says it will publish technical and migration details before any changes are required.
#Zilliqa #Ethereum #Layer2 #InstitutionalFinance #ChainWatch
Around 2 million legal entities hold an active LEI today. Most people have never heard of it.
An LEI is a passport number for a company: 20 characters, one for each legal entity. It came after the 2008 crisis. Regulators require it, so banks, funds and asset managers need one to trade.
The vLEI is its digital version. Software checks it in under a second. It proves which company is acting, and who is authorised to act for it.
On the Zilliqa Layer 2, only wallets whitelisted through a verified vLEI can transact.
Replying to @zilliqa
Hi Zilliqa team, thank you for the FAQ and the transparency so far. Below are specific questions from a ZIL holder. To make them easy to answer, I’ve asked for numbers, dates, or yes/no wherever possible.
New ZIL and the transition
1. The FAQ says the L2 brings “21B new ZIL that will be distributed to their rightful owners.” Will existing ZIL be replaced or invalidated? Will every holder receive new ZIL 1:1, yes or no? If not, what percentage of the 21B goes to non-holders (company, foundation, team, investors, LTIN, institutions)?
2. How much ZIL do the company, foundation, team, and investors hold today, and will they receive any of the new ZIL? Will you publish these balances, including lock-ups, before any snapshot?
3. Will you commit to a minimum notice period (for example 30 days) and publish the exact mechanics before any snapshot, swap, or migration?
Token value
4. Fees are “most probably 0 ZIL,” there is most probably no staking, and the required ZIL per institution is “kept as low as possible.” Please name one concrete mechanism where ZIL demand grows with network usage, and show the math: how much ZIL would be required in total with 10 institutions, and with 100?
5. Burns are “based on revenue.” If fees are zero, what is the revenue, who pays it, and in what currency? Will burns be automatic and onchain, or discretionary?
6. With security coming from Ethereum, why would a holder prefer ZIL over holding ETH? What do holders get that they do not get today?
Staking and the current chain
7. If staking is removed, what happens to staked ZIL: end date for rewards, unstaking period, any penalty, and any compensation for lost yield? How much ZIL is staked today?
Control and censorship
8. Who holds the upgrade keys, pause function, whitelist policy, and the power to replace the sequencer (names or entities, multisig threshold, timelock)? Will you commit that users can always force-withdraw to Ethereum without LTIN’s permission?
9. Can LTIN or Zilliqa revoke a vLEI and thereby block or freeze a wallet’s funds? Can the funds of non-institutional holders be frozen? Which law and regulator apply (for example Liechtenstein’s TVTG, MiCAR), and has ZIL been legally classified?
LTIN dependency
10. What percentage of LTIN does Zilliqa own, and is the arrangement exclusive? LTIN has also announced identity work on other chains such as Solana. What stops institutions from using LTIN’s vLEIs elsewhere without ZIL? If LTIN’s QVI accreditation is delayed or denied, what is Plan B?
Proof of demand and accountability
11. The FAQ says no institution is committed to production yet. How many signed letters of intent or pilots exist? By what date will the first institution transact on the L2? What milestone, by what date, would you accept as proof the strategy has failed, and what would you do then?
12. The earlier roadmap listed a Mediation Layer specification and a first public report on ZIL economics as early milestones. Which were delivered, which were not, and why should the new timeline be trusted?
Incidents
13. X-Bridge: how much value was lost? Was the compromised key a single key or part of a multisig, who held it, and how was it compromised? Has an independent post-mortem been commissioned? Will the treasury be used for compensation, yes or no? Also, did the external security firm announced on 25 October produce findings, and will they be published by a specific date?
14. ZRC-2: what was the total value extracted, how much was frozen or recovered at exchanges, and will recovered funds go to affected LPs and holders? An earlier version of the FAQ said PlunderSwap goes offline on 26 November and asked liquidity providers to withdraw; that line was removed. Is the date still valid?
Company
15. What is the runway in months, and what is the treasury composition? Will you publish it by a specific date? When will permanent leadership be named, and does the former CEO keep any advisory role or token or equity interest?
Thank you for your time. Clear answers, even partial ones with dates, would help holders plan with confidence. Looking forward to your reply.
Want the longer version? It’s in the FAQ.
teapaw.org/zilliqa/status/2119768…
ZIL holders: the move to Layer 2 needs no action from you today.
Scammers love a migration. Zilliqa will never ask you to send your recovery phrase to anyone.
If someone offers you a claim, swap or migration, check zilliqa.com first.
C.Meij retweeted
🚀 Zilliqa's migration to Ethereum Layer 2 could put it in competition with major players in the L2 ecosystem:
🔹 Arbitrum (ARB)
🔹 Optimism (OP)
🔹 zkSync (ZK)
🔹 Starknet (STRK)
🔹 Scroll (SCR)
🔹 Mantle (MNT)
🔹 Linea
@zilliqa
👇👇👇👇
























