itrade ~ iprofit from your loss πΈg00n activist πΈΒ§tarted clippin at age 2β’ check-out @smcdao
Spiritual
Joined September 2024
- Tweets84.1K
- Following1.7K
- Followers2.1K
- Likes93.7K
Spazze π³ retweeted
the person responsible for manually creating every ad variation in the company just watched the @usefastlane demo and suddenly needs a moment alone ππ
π€ Paid partnership
Spazze π³ retweeted
INJ just got spotted on Robinhood.
Robinhood already holds a large share of US retail traders and INJ has spent months building the regulated side.
Transfer agent status, CFTC futures, the Canary filing and the Washington meetings all point the same way.
A retail app that normal users already have is the missing piece, if the teaser turns into real access.
It is still a teaser. Wait for the official confirmation before you treat it as live.
What matters is the pattern.
@injective keeps showing up where regulated and retail paths meet, not only on crypto native apps.
Would you buy $INJ on Robinhood if it goes live?
Spazze π³ retweeted
Escrow is the easy part.
The dispute layer is the part that decides if agent commerce works.
I've been reading how @termix_ai handles it.
Here is what I understood:
When an agent delivers, the job does not pay out right away.
A challenge window opens first. During that window, anyone can say the work is wrong.
If someone challenges, a random panel of 3 evaluators reviews the delivery.
Random matters. Nobody can pick friendly judges.
Both sides have money on the line.
Providers stake before taking work.
Evaluators stake too.
A provider who delivers bad work can be slashed. An evaluator who judges badly can be slashed as well.
Being wrong costs something for everyone in the room.
If a decision is disputed again, there is an arbitration path above the panel.
Some jobs need stronger proof. For those, TEE or zkVM proofs are optional.
They let a job show it was run the way it claimed, not just that someone said so.
Then there is reputation.
It only gets written from settled outcomes, ones that could have been challenged.
An agent cannot collect a good record from jobs nobody could question.
Why this matters more than escrow:
if bad or hostile work can slip through, buyers leave. Locking money is easy.
Deciding who is right when two sides disagree is the hard part.
I do not know the exact rules for how evaluator seats are given out or rewarded, so I am not guessing.
That is the part I want to read more on.
Human final review is one answer. An on-chain challenge window is another.
Deliverable hash β window β evaluators β settle or don't.
On agent.family, trust is a state machine.
Spazze π³ retweeted
e-commerce founders about to open 15 new tabs, research every competitor in their niche, and start testing new creatives after watching this @usefastlane demo ππ°
π€ Paid partnership
Spazze π³ retweeted
free mint to $20π©
nft on robinhood chain cooking
thanks for the GTD bro @BigAbdulWeb3
first, ai helped us create content faster.
now @usefastlane is going after the entire paid marketing workflow.
Spazze π³ retweeted
in @fomopoly_rh, i think timing could be just as important as the assets you own.
sometimes, expanding your position might seem like the obvious choice but other times, holding back and waiting for a better opportunity could make more sense.
that creates a different kind of challenge: knowing when to act, when to stay patient, and when your current strategy needs to change.
i'm interested in seeing how these decisions play out as players navigate the ecosystem and work with $DEAL.
because having a plan matters, but knowing when to adjust it can make all the difference.
explore the ecosystem: fomopoly.com
π€ Paid partnership
with @fomopoly_rh, i'm looking at how players can turn individual properties into a bigger plan rather than treating every asset as a separate win.
the connection between land, stocks, and $DEAL adds another layer to decision making. each choice can influence what becomes possible next, making it important to think beyond the immediate reward.
i'm curious to see how players combine these different elements to build strategies that stand out over time.
the goal isn't simply to collect more, but to understand how everything works together.
explore the ecosystem: fomopoly.com
Spazze π³ retweeted
True, but @StandX_Official is a good example of projects actually compensating users.
I personally lost a high 2-figure amount trading, and the checker went live today. What I received covers almost 95% of my losses.
Canβt speak for everyone, but I think thatβs a fair way to handle it.
I don't like the trend of projects shutting down pre-TGE and being seen as somewhat heroic because they didn't extract.
It's incredibly disingenuous because people burn thousands, sometimes tens of thousands of dollars farming these airdrops, I know people who are down five figs on Abstract memes or paid high four figs in StandX fees.
Not doing a TGE just for the sake of it *can* be heroic, but only if there's adequate compensation for the people who used the products in justified expectations of being rewarded
Spazze π³ retweeted
what if your ads could get smarter with every campaign instead of starting from scratch every time?
that's the kind of future @usefastlane is pushing toward.
π€ Paid partnership
Spazze π³ retweeted
ad creation, launching, and tracking all in one place. fastlane is making the whole process look ridiculously simple.
π€ Paid partnership
Spazze π³ retweeted
literally me chasing the AI that finds winning competitor ads and starts making thousands of variations in seconds! @UseFastlane
π€ Paid partnership
Spazze π³ retweeted
alright, @usefastlane might have just changed the marketing game forever π
π€ Paid partnership
Spazze π³ retweeted
Meta shares just pumped, and banks projecting it to even go higher
"I do wish I held my long. I sold it a few days ago"
"but I may go back in since a lot of banks are projecting that Meta will be worth $900 plus sometime next year."
Spazze π³ retweeted
Most people think of a public ledger as a transparency feature.
But for anyone moving real size, it's closer to a live feed of your strategy.
Visible positions get tracked. Visible deposits can be traded against. That's why "confidential finance" is more than a privacy slogan it's about using open rails without publishing your playbook.
@primus_labs Confidential Vault on BNB Chain is the concrete example. You shield $U into an encrypted version, $EU, send it without exposing the amount, or deposit it for yield without showing your position size. You can convert back whenever you want, and reports say selective decryption can still serve audits.
The detail I find most interesting is that this works on a chain people already use.
I haven't seen independent usage data yet, so treat it as promising, not proven.
Start earning XP: points.primuslabs.xyz/?ref=Jβ¦
s.kaito.ai/AVooSYM
@KaitoAI
π€ Paid partnership
Why institutions still stay out of onchain finance:
It's not the technology. It's the exposure.
A fund can't show its positions to the whole internet. A bank can't publish client activity on a public ledger. A treasury can't broadcast its strategy before it executes it.
But the same institutions also can't ask anyone to just trust their claims. Compliance, auditors, and counterparties all need proof.
So the real requirement has two parts:
Privacy for what must stay confidential.
Verification for what must be trusted.
Remove either one, and institutional activity doesn't happen.
That's the problem @primus_labs is built to solve.
Start earning XP: points.primuslabs.xyz/?ref=Jβ¦
s.kaito.ai/AVooSYM
@KaitoAI
Spazze π³ retweeted
first, ai helped us create content faster.
now @usefastlane is going after the entire paid marketing workflow.
π€ Paid partnership
Spazze π³ retweeted
the real game changer isn't ai making ads.
it's ai learning what works, improving the creatives, and helping teams scale winning campaigns.
fastlane is taking this seriously.
π€ Paid partnership
Spazze π³ retweeted
good ad ideas are everywhere. testing them properly is the hard part. @UseFastlane makes that process possible.
π€ Paid partnership
Spazze π³ retweeted
Grvt has completed its first 1.1M ethereum:0xad29f2723fcdbcf665f210f25e06f97477e417cf buyback and burn, nearly 1% of circulating supply at the time.
The tokens were permanently burned, not held in a treasury. Thatβs real execution, not just a roadmap promise.
Future buybacks are intended monthly, at the issuerβs discretion, with every transaction tracked onchain.
And Grvt 2.0 is bringing more:
β Grvt Earn, targeting up to 11% yield, not guaranteed.
β Stable Funding Perps, expanding into stocks, FX, commodities, and indices.
β Yield as Margin, letting eligible balances earn while trading.
β A unified self custodial app for earning, trading, and investing.
Yield as Margin is what excites me most. Grvt is making capital work harder without sacrificing self custody.
@grvt_io