César Sinde (@CesarSinde) header
César Sinde (@CesarSinde) profile picture

Periodista. Interesado en Política, Economía, Motor, Vivienda y Seguridad Vial. Madrid, ESPAÑA. V.E.R.D.E 👑🇪🇸

Madrid, España
Joined March 2011
Photo by César Sinde (@CesarSinde)Photo by César Sinde (@CesarSinde)Photo by César Sinde (@CesarSinde)Photo by César Sinde (@CesarSinde)Photo by César Sinde (@CesarSinde)Photo by César Sinde (@CesarSinde)Photo by César Sinde (@CesarSinde)Photo by César Sinde (@CesarSinde)Photo by César Sinde (@CesarSinde)Photo by César Sinde (@CesarSinde)
Mucho habla la izquierda de que la vivienda es un derecho reconocido en la Constitución Pero este derecho se manipula burda, tosca y torticeramente dando a entender que el Estado puede hasta confiscar a las personas sus propiedades o que se puede entrar a una casa a vivir gratis
35
49
3
117
33,476
Una vez más, un diésel salvándole el culo a un coche eléctrico.
206
El #Gobierno destroza el mercado de vivienda en compra de obra nueva y alquiler. Aprobando leyes e impuestos confiscatorios. Y luego usa ese destrozo que ha provocado para justificar más intervención que sólo trae más escasez. #ViviendaDigna
2
183
Los propietarios de vivienda SOMOS la mayoría social: ✅ El 73% de los españoles residimos en un inmueble de NUESTRA propiedad. ✅ El 92% de los 3,6 millones de viviendas en alquiler son de particulares. Datos del Banco de España. #ViviendaDigna
1
1
297
Criminalizar a los propietarios de #vivienda por el uso que hagan de ella es totalitario. El propietario de una vivienda es el que tiene que decidir cómo usa o no usa SU casa. #ViviendaDigna
1
124
Legislando en contra de los propietarios se perjudica a los inquilinos: ❌ Menos oferta de vivienda en alquiler ❌ Alquileres más caros ❌ Inmuebles de peor calidad ❌ Mayores requisitos de solvencia a los inquilinos #ViviendaDigna
1
1
129
Nunca se aumenta la oferta de un bien atacando a los que ofrecen un bien en el mercado. Secuestrando la #ViviendaDigna de los propietarios que alquilan sólo se provoca más caída en la oferta, precios más caros y que se pidan más garantías de solvencia a quien pretenda alquilar.
1
2
122
El #Gobierno hace política de #ViviendaDigna con las casas de los demás. Robar la vivienda de quien la tiene no es la solución, sino todo lo contrario. El propietario de vivienda tiene que tener garantizado SUS derechos sobre SU inmueble.
1
5
397
El #Gobierno ha aprobado el secuestro de la #ViviendaDigna de la gente. En sólo un mes desde que aprobó sus decretos #Maricarmen, la oferta de vivienda en alquiler se ha desplomado en 26.500 casas. Y desde 2028, otras 400.000 viviendas ya no se alquilan. #SocialismoEsMiseria
1
1
195
💢 135,9 Millones de € públicos para el CINE en lo que va de 2026. No tardarán en sumarse a la campaña del PSOE, pues ya han cobrado, como los sindicatos. ¿Entienden ahora los discursitos de la ceremonia de los Goya? Que me quedo sin comer…
37
1,254
40
1,651
19,113
El #Gobierno perpetúa el secuestro de la #ViviendaDigna de los particulares que alquilan. Desde la aprobación de los decretos #Maricarmen se han retirado 20.000 viviendas del mercado del alquiler. Perseguir al propietario sólo provoca escasez y carestía de casas
1
2
67
NUNCA aumenta la oferta de un bien atacando a los que ofrecen ese bien en el mercado. Si no hay más oferta de un bien, NUNCA bajarán los precios de ese bien. Los propietarios de #ViviendaDigna no están para dar alojamiento gratis en sus casas a NADIE.
1
1
35
Los propietarios de #ViviendaDigna no tenemos por qué ser criminalizados por lo que decidamos sobre nuestras propiedades Cuanto más se viola el derecho del dueño de un inmueble a decidir sobre lo que es SUYO, menos gente va alquilar Y la escasez de oferta perjudica al inquilino
2
4
47
Los propietarios de vivienda somos la mayoría social: ➡️ El 73% de los españoles vivimos en una casa de nuestra propiedad. Datos del Banco de España. Decretar el secuestro de la vivienda de la gente es ir en contra de la mayoría social #ViviendaDigna
2
2
52
El #Gobierno ha imposibilitado ofrecer #ViviendaDigna y asequible con sus leyes e impuestos. Y cuando ha hecho imposible que el mercado funcione, interviene todavía más en el mismo sentido. Es como intentar curarte la cirrosis del hígado bebiendo más alcohol. De locos.
4
5
50
César Sinde retweeted
No sé quién es, pero este tío es un crack 🤣🤣🤣
146
3,740
104
13,242
338,194
Los mal llamados piquetes “informativos”no son informativos, sino COACTIVOS. Por eso hay que PROHIBIRLOS Quien no quiera secundar una huelga no tiene por qué hacerlo Y NADIE tiene derecho a impedirte que trabajes Los sindicatos son una mafia #HuelgaGeneral11
4
13
483
Esto está dando la vuelta al mundo y con razón. Es una explicación perfecta de cómo el globalismo se ha convertido en ideología dominante. Es el proceso que explico en “Reiniciar España”.
Recently I told you there are two kinds of people in this system: cynics and believers. Ursula von der Leyen, I put her with the believers. And that's exactly why you need to understand how the machine works. Because cynics are very rare. Soros, I put him in that category: he knows exactly what he's doing, and he has never hidden it. He read Popper, he has a theory of change, and he understood early on something the right still hasn't figured out: you don't change a society by winning an election. You change it by funding, for thirty years, the people who will write the reports, train the lawyers, and advise whoever wins the elections. $24 billion spent by Open Society since its creation. More than 50,000 grants. In 2015, he wrote in plain text that the EU must accept at least a million asylum seekers a year, and mobilize NGOs, churches and businesses to take them in. All of it is public. That's the most impressive part. Here's how the system got hacked, in three steps. Step one: selection. Nobody recruits idiots. No need. The money does the selecting on its own. A grant never goes to the person who doubts. It goes to the person who already believes. Repeat that over thirty years and tens of thousands of grants, and you get an entire ecosystem where the free thinker was filtered out at the door. He wasn't fired. He just never got funded. What's left: people who are sincere, credentialed, conformist, and whose paycheck depends on the cause. Step two: funding manufactures conviction. Try explaining something to someone whose paycheck depends on not getting it. The NGO produces a report. The report gets cited by an expert. The expert testifies before the Commission. The Commission turns it into a directive. And the NGO guy ends up in a cabinet, then goes back to a foundation. Everyone knows each other, cites each other, funds each other. It's an echo chamber with a budget. Step three: emotion. You never debate results. You debate intentions. One photo beats a thousand statistics. Every objection backed by numbers becomes a moral failing. And when reality contradicts the narrative, the dissonance always gets resolved the same way: "It's a necessary evil." "It's collateral damage." "The real problem is elsewhere." Immigration is never a problem. The problem is your perception. The result: the system doesn't produce corrupt people. It produces NPCs. People reciting a script while convinced they wrote it themselves. Ursula doesn't need to be bought. She has spent her entire career in an environment where every expert, every report, every "civil society" group tells her the same thing. She is convinced she's on the side of good. And that's what makes her immune to facts. And the best part of the story: Soros isn't even the system's biggest funder anymore. You are. Between 2021 and 2023, €7.4 billion in EU funds went to more than 12,000 NGOs. The European Court of Auditors itself says it can't get a reliable picture of who gets what. The hack worked so well that the machine now runs on your taxes. This is not a conspiracy. A conspiracy hides. Here, the amounts are public, the op-eds are public, the recipients are public. It's an incentive system. And you don't fight an incentive system by insulting the believers. You fight it by cutting off the tap and demanding total transparency: who funds whom, to say what. As long as it stays opaque, they'll keep shipping believers at scale.
10
244
2
531
14,426
César Sinde retweeted
Recently I told you there are two kinds of people in this system: cynics and believers. Ursula von der Leyen, I put her with the believers. And that's exactly why you need to understand how the machine works. Because cynics are very rare. Soros, I put him in that category: he knows exactly what he's doing, and he has never hidden it. He read Popper, he has a theory of change, and he understood early on something the right still hasn't figured out: you don't change a society by winning an election. You change it by funding, for thirty years, the people who will write the reports, train the lawyers, and advise whoever wins the elections. $24 billion spent by Open Society since its creation. More than 50,000 grants. In 2015, he wrote in plain text that the EU must accept at least a million asylum seekers a year, and mobilize NGOs, churches and businesses to take them in. All of it is public. That's the most impressive part. Here's how the system got hacked, in three steps. Step one: selection. Nobody recruits idiots. No need. The money does the selecting on its own. A grant never goes to the person who doubts. It goes to the person who already believes. Repeat that over thirty years and tens of thousands of grants, and you get an entire ecosystem where the free thinker was filtered out at the door. He wasn't fired. He just never got funded. What's left: people who are sincere, credentialed, conformist, and whose paycheck depends on the cause. Step two: funding manufactures conviction. Try explaining something to someone whose paycheck depends on not getting it. The NGO produces a report. The report gets cited by an expert. The expert testifies before the Commission. The Commission turns it into a directive. And the NGO guy ends up in a cabinet, then goes back to a foundation. Everyone knows each other, cites each other, funds each other. It's an echo chamber with a budget. Step three: emotion. You never debate results. You debate intentions. One photo beats a thousand statistics. Every objection backed by numbers becomes a moral failing. And when reality contradicts the narrative, the dissonance always gets resolved the same way: "It's a necessary evil." "It's collateral damage." "The real problem is elsewhere." Immigration is never a problem. The problem is your perception. The result: the system doesn't produce corrupt people. It produces NPCs. People reciting a script while convinced they wrote it themselves. Ursula doesn't need to be bought. She has spent her entire career in an environment where every expert, every report, every "civil society" group tells her the same thing. She is convinced she's on the side of good. And that's what makes her immune to facts. And the best part of the story: Soros isn't even the system's biggest funder anymore. You are. Between 2021 and 2023, €7.4 billion in EU funds went to more than 12,000 NGOs. The European Court of Auditors itself says it can't get a reliable picture of who gets what. The hack worked so well that the machine now runs on your taxes. This is not a conspiracy. A conspiracy hides. Here, the amounts are public, the op-eds are public, the recipients are public. It's an incentive system. And you don't fight an incentive system by insulting the believers. You fight it by cutting off the tap and demanding total transparency: who funds whom, to say what. As long as it stays opaque, they'll keep shipping believers at scale.
302
2,834
296
7,437
287,379
César Sinde retweeted
En catalán, huelga se dice vaga. Vaya acierto de sustantivo. Vaga viene de vagar, que en catalán también significa no hacer nada, y este del latín vacare, estar libre de ocupaciones. De la misma familia sale vagància.
11
98
2
584
11,015
César Sinde retweeted
Es decir, que no vienen a pagarte las pensiones. Vienen a que se las pagues tú.
18
1,416
3
5,218
52,554