@CiteCase

We are a small group of lawyers. We read law and judgments and watch Courts and lawyers. We share what we learn/read/see and our views.

 India
citecase.in
Joined July 2021
  • Tweets21.6K
  • Following5
  • Followers44.4K
7.7KMedia
Dear all, reading our posts on X are sufficient for a lawyer or law student to stay updated with latest Supreme Court Judgments. If you think you should support us, please subscribe here: caseciter.in/pricing ! Thank you in advance.

CaseCiter — Supreme Court of India Judgments Archive

Search every reported Supreme Court of India judgment with full-text search and structured filters across statutes, benches, dispositions and case types.

caseciter.in
3
2
10
5,102
A classic case of how an investigation should not be proceeded with:
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase9h
ARUN @ DEEPAK v. STATE OF U.P. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

ARUN @ DEEPAK vs. STATE OF U.P.

2026 INSC 1150 — Electronic evidence is inadmissible in the absence of a mandatory certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

caseciter.in
6
45
1,705
Justice GP Singh universe🔥
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase8h
THE ASSESSING OFFICER, TEXTILES COMMITTEE v. M/S. PREMIUM SUITING PVT. LTD. & ANOTHER caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

THE ASSESSING OFFICER, TEXTILES COMMITTEE vs. M/S. PREMIUM SUITING PVT. LTD. & ANOTHER

2026 INSC 1158 — In the absence of a definition of "manufacture" in the Textiles Committee Act, 1963, the definition provided in the Central Excise Act, 1944, cannot be imported as the two…

caseciter.in
2
20
1,183
THE ASSESSING OFFICER, TEXTILES COMMITTEE v. M/S. PREMIUM SUITING PVT. LTD. & ANOTHER caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

THE ASSESSING OFFICER, TEXTILES COMMITTEE vs. M/S. PREMIUM SUITING PVT. LTD. & ANOTHER

2026 INSC 1158 — In the absence of a definition of "manufacture" in the Textiles Committee Act, 1963, the definition provided in the Central Excise Act, 1944, cannot be imported as the two…

caseciter.in
1
1
1
1,359
The powers of a Constitutional Court cannot be totally circumscribed by statutory provisions, reiterates #SupremeCourt !
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase8h
DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. v. VAIBHAV METAL CRUSHER caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. vs. VAIBHAV METAL CRUSHER

2026 INSC 1157 — In cases of electricity theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the amount required for restoration of supply upon disconnection must be assessed using the procedure…

caseciter.in
2
17
1,015
DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. v. VAIBHAV METAL CRUSHER caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. vs. VAIBHAV METAL CRUSHER

2026 INSC 1157 — In cases of electricity theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the amount required for restoration of supply upon disconnection must be assessed using the procedure…

caseciter.in
1
1
1
1,199
Much ado about Hakkupatra 🙂
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase9h
BALAKRISHNA (DEAD) THR. LRS. v. G.N. KANNIAH NAIDU (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ANOTHER caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

BALAKRISHNA (DEAD) THR. LRS. vs. G.N. KANNIAH NAIDU (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ANOTHER

2026 INSC 1155 — An application filed under Order XXI Rules 97 to 101 CPC is equivalent to a regular suit, and the Executing Court is legally mandated to adjudicate the rights, title, and interest…

caseciter.in
1
6
849
Looking for a #SupremeCourt judgment that rejected Res Judicata plea by applying 'Fraud vitiates all solemn acts’ Principle? Here is it:
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase9h
N. Arasappa v. State of Karnataka & Ors. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

N. Arasappa vs. State of Karnataka & Ors.

2026 INSC 1151 — The acquisition of land for a Cooperative Society under Section 3(f)(vi) of the Land Acquisition Act requires the prior approval of a specific housing scheme, including a layout…

caseciter.in
12
56
2,503
When Supreme Court of India began its judgment endorsing an observation from a very old judgment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania:
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase9h
N. Arasappa v. State of Karnataka & Ors. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

N. Arasappa vs. State of Karnataka & Ors.

2026 INSC 1151 — The acquisition of land for a Cooperative Society under Section 3(f)(vi) of the Land Acquisition Act requires the prior approval of a specific housing scheme, including a layout…

caseciter.in
2
24
1,743
N. Arasappa v. State of Karnataka & Ors. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

N. Arasappa vs. State of Karnataka & Ors.

2026 INSC 1151 — The acquisition of land for a Cooperative Society under Section 3(f)(vi) of the Land Acquisition Act requires the prior approval of a specific housing scheme, including a layout…

caseciter.in
1
1
4,371
This Court is not only the Court of law but also a Court of equity and the relief, says #SupremeCourt !
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase9h
ATIBIR INDUSTRIES CO. LTD. v. STATE BANK OF INDIA & ANR. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

ATIBIR INDUSTRIES CO. LTD. vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA & ANR.

2026 INSC 1156 — While the validity of asset classification and assignment is subject to legal scrutiny, the Supreme Court, in the exercise of its equitable jurisdiction to preserve a running…

caseciter.in
1
6
20
958
ATIBIR INDUSTRIES CO. LTD. v. STATE BANK OF INDIA & ANR. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

ATIBIR INDUSTRIES CO. LTD. vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA & ANR.

2026 INSC 1156 — While the validity of asset classification and assignment is subject to legal scrutiny, the Supreme Court, in the exercise of its equitable jurisdiction to preserve a running…

caseciter.in
1
1
1
1,256
"Six years have been erased from the life of a man on the strength of a concocted story built on mere surmises and conjectures...We come across such travesty of justice in many matters.." #SupremeCourt asks State Of Uttar Pradesh to pay 6 Lakh Compensation to murder accused (who was acquitted later) who spent 6 years in jail as under-trial.
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase9h
ARUN @ DEEPAK v. STATE OF U.P. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

ARUN @ DEEPAK vs. STATE OF U.P.

2026 INSC 1150 — Electronic evidence is inadmissible in the absence of a mandatory certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

caseciter.in
6
15
1,048
ARUN @ DEEPAK v. STATE OF U.P. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

ARUN @ DEEPAK vs. STATE OF U.P.

2026 INSC 1150 — Electronic evidence is inadmissible in the absence of a mandatory certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

caseciter.in
1
1
9
2,797
#SupremeCourt: Application filed under Order XXI Rules 97 to 101 CPC is on par with a regular suit and that is the reason why an order passed on such application is appealable as a regular first appeal.
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase9h
BALAKRISHNA (DEAD) THR. LRS. v. G.N. KANNIAH NAIDU (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ANOTHER caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

BALAKRISHNA (DEAD) THR. LRS. vs. G.N. KANNIAH NAIDU (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ANOTHER

2026 INSC 1155 — An application filed under Order XXI Rules 97 to 101 CPC is equivalent to a regular suit, and the Executing Court is legally mandated to adjudicate the rights, title, and interest…

caseciter.in
2
22
1,259
BALAKRISHNA (DEAD) THR. LRS. v. G.N. KANNIAH NAIDU (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ANOTHER caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

BALAKRISHNA (DEAD) THR. LRS. vs. G.N. KANNIAH NAIDU (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ANOTHER

2026 INSC 1155 — An application filed under Order XXI Rules 97 to 101 CPC is equivalent to a regular suit, and the Executing Court is legally mandated to adjudicate the rights, title, and interest…

caseciter.in
1
1
3
2,053
#SupremeCourt judgment on scope of definition of information under RTI Act:
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase10h
The Muppathadam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. The State Chief Information Commissioner & Ors. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

The Muppathadam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. vs. The State Chief Information Commissioner & Ors.

2026 INSC 1153 — Information held by a private body becomes accessible under the Right to Information Act, 2005, if a public authority has the statutory power to access such information under any…

caseciter.in
1
16
2
72
2,880
The Muppathadam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. The State Chief Information Commissioner & Ors. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

The Muppathadam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. vs. The State Chief Information Commissioner & Ors.

2026 INSC 1153 — Information held by a private body becomes accessible under the Right to Information Act, 2005, if a public authority has the statutory power to access such information under any…

caseciter.in
2
1
5
2,987
Counsel: I will take only two seconds, My Lord. Judge: One.... Two....over. Court room bursts into laughter. (Just watched this from Kerala HC Division Bench hearing in Writ Appeal filed by @pinarayivijayan & others)
1
13
2,309
❤️
Sahaj from Courtroom by TLOI@sahajtloiOct 24
The war between the parliament and the Supreme Court over the Arbitration Act - the 2015 & 19 Amendments, Automatic Stay under 36, date of challenge to awards, BCCI & Hindustan Construction Judgment in 2019.
20
1,888
Load more