Bernard (@ClastonB) header
Bernard (@ClastonB) profile picture

Olympian. Author. Speaker. CWG Gold, LSU NCAA & SEC Champ. I do my civic duties. Former US Congress Candidate. Intact families are the strength of our society.

Louisiana, USA
Joined July 2010
Photo by Bernard (@ClastonB)Photo by Bernard (@ClastonB)Photo by Bernard (@ClastonB)Photo by Bernard (@ClastonB)Photo by Bernard (@ClastonB)Photo by Bernard (@ClastonB)Photo by Bernard (@ClastonB)Photo by Bernard (@ClastonB)Photo by Bernard (@ClastonB)Photo by Bernard (@ClastonB)
Earlier this afternoon a tanker hit a cruise ship along the Mississippi River in New Orleans. The cruise ship took on water and eventually flipped. Because of the heroic work of our first responders ALL PASSENGERS have been accounted for. This is nothing short of a miracle. While we will continue to work through the details of this incident, one thing is clear: our first responders on the national, state, and local level saved countless lives today, and for that I and all of our country are thankful!
5
28
1
220
5,524
Bernard retweeted
Do you realize how absurd evolution really is?
358
60
37
881
112,248
Becky and I are saddened by the passing of my good friend State Rep. Mike Bayham. Mike was a good man who cared deeply about the people of St. Bernard Parish and Louisiana and served them faithfully. Rest in peace my friend. You will be missed. wdsu.com/article/mike-bayham…
34
51
1
520
41,210
Early this morning Representative Mike Bayham passed away. Mike was a true public servant, bringing passion and determination to everything he did. The interests of St. Bernard Parish and Louisiana were always at the forefront. Throughout his health battles, Mike remained joyful and dedicated to his work. Always in pursuit of ways to make Louisiana better. While I know we will all miss Mike’s presence throughout the halls of the Capitol and the streets of St. Bernard, I know that he has “fought the good fight, finished the race, and kept the faith.” Sharon and I join all of Louisiana in mourning this loss. Please keep the Bayham family, his colleagues in the legislature, and St. Bernard Parish in your prayers.
4
35
5
173
5,909
Yup!
I agree with Mike Davis.  President Biden should NOT be treated like this by the River to the Sea bastards.  Like him or not, he was our president and this is appalling.  These people should be rounded up and charged. aol.com/articles/protesters-…
252
Wow. Check for planet alignment. @marklevinshow agrees with me. I published this a long time ago but if you really want to know the True Historical Precedent for After Office Impeachment- Here it is! krisannehall.com/2021/01/24/…
The Democrats impeached President Trump a second time and actually had a trial in the Senate when he was a private citizen.  Therefore, I propose the impeachment of every past president who is still alive for military operations in which they never received a declaration of war -- impeach them all and try them all -- as this is the new standard.  The same for every past, living SecDef and SecState.
2
23
1
52
1,609
Zechariah 14:4 describes the day when the Lord’s feet will stand on the Mount of Olives. Acts 1:11-12 tells us that Yeshua will return in the same manner as He ascended, and identifies the Mount of Olives as the place from which He departed. The connection is unmistakable: Yeshua is returning to Israel. And His descent will be to the Mount of Olives.
41
42
2
260
3,610
Another prophet of the false religion of Darwinism. You admit you don’t know how the universe came into existence, yet ridicule Genesis. What arrogance! Genesis declares, “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.” Something cannot come from absolute nothing. Natural laws do not explain their own existence.
Replying to @ClastonB
Invoking Genesis shows me you have no idea how the universe came to be. There's no need to bring in fairy tales when we don't know.
2
1
5
301
Nayib Bukele: “There is no State that cannot defeat criminals. If a State does not defeat criminality, it is because the State is complicit.” @nayibbukele
907
13,184
1,314
54,425
1,262,114
This is getting more and more comical each day. The False Prophets of the Darwin delusion is out in full force pushing their fallacious arguments. Michael Shermer, defeated what, exactly? Can a dead cell bring itself back to life? Even when its chemical components remain, possessing those components does not mean we can restore life. Yet you presume that invoking natural processes settles the question of life’s ultimate origin. And what exactly did Darwin contribute to explaining why life exists in the first place? Nothing. His theory presupposes living, reproducing organisms. It does not explain the origin of life, consciousness, intelligence, or the laws governing existence. Now consider the men who helped establish the foundations of modern science. Isaac Newton and Blaise Pascal believed in God. Their conviction that the universe was the work of an intelligent Creator informed their understanding that nature operated according to rational, uniform, discoverable LAWS. Those laws made systematic observation, experimentation, mathematical prediction, and scientific advancement possible. The scientific revolution was not founded upon atheistic Darwinism. It preceded Darwin and was profoundly shaped by men who believed in divine creation. And now you ridicule Genesis while invoking the authority of a scientific tradition whose foundations were helped along by believers in the God of Genesis? Genesis declares that God created life. Christ’s resurrection proclaims His sovereignty over death. You may describe biological changes, but you have not thereby explained the ultimate origin of life or demonstrated that creation is unguided. Like the prophets of Baal, you announce victory while the fundamental question remains unanswered. You have not defeated the Creator by studying the laws of His creation.
I wrote a book refuting Intelligent Design Creationism in 2006 @GadSaad . It's hard to believe that Behe, and others, who were thoroughly defeated in the Dover trial & exposed as religious evangelists, not scientists, are still going at it. Why not believe God used evolution?
1
1
184
Please join Sharon and me in prayer for Representative Mike Bayham who is facing severe health challenges. Although this is a hard battle, I know Mike is as tough as nails! All of Louisiana is with you, thinking of you, and praying for you, Mike!
12
41
10
196
15,519
Beast mode.
Nou kenbe pwomès nou… Nou detwi kay Lanmò San Jou ak katye jeneral gang 400 Mawozo a. Pifò ladan yo kouri ale san yo pa menm eseye goumen. Ala lach yo lach! 🥲
1
15
343
Gad Saad, you still have no answer for Genesis. Genesis declares that God created man in His own image and breathed into him the breath of life. Life, intelligence, consciousness, and moral awareness originate with the Creator, not with some self originating, unguided process. But here is what makes this dismissal of Genesis particularly foolish and fatal. The same God who gave life in Genesis demonstrated His absolute sovereignty over death through the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Christ was crucified, died, was buried, and rose again on the third day. The very thing humanity cannot accomplish through its scientific ingenuity, restoring life after irreversible death, Scripture declares that Christ accomplished by divine power. Acts 2:24 says, “because it was not possible that he should be holden of it.” Think about that. Death itself could not hold the Author of life. Genesis reveals the origin of life. The resurrection reveals the authority over life and death. Together, they confront the philosophical presumption that unguided natural processes are the ultimate explanation of existence.
OK, let me see if I can carve out the next four weeks to offer you a rebuttal to issues that have been addressed in innumerable ways across countless disciplines for nearly 160 years. Your referencing Genesis is definitely the fatal blow to Darwin. Back to the drawing board!
1
2
313
Tongue in cheek, Gad Saad: you offered no substantive basis for your assertions, only sarcasm and a name drop. So stay with your “160 years.” I will stay with Genesis. That is my first premise, and it is not arbitrary. Some of the greatest scientific minds in history, Isaac Newton, Blaise Pascal, and many others who built the foundations of modern inquiry, operated from the biblical worldview of a rational Creator whose orderly creation could be studied and understood. Newton wrote more on Scripture than on science and attributed the design of the solar system to an intelligent Being. Pascal grounded human nature in the Fall and distinguished empirical method from revelation while remaining a committed Christian. Their theistic framework (not atheism) supplied the expectation that nature is law governed and intelligible. If you can show that framework is false, or that those men somehow advanced science despite rather than because of their starting point, then mock away. Until then, invoking Richard (“oh my God”) Dawkins and declaring evolution “more evidenced than gravity” is simply an appeal to authority plus ridicule. It does not address the origin of existence, the source of the laws of nature, consciousness, reason, or objective moral obligation. Like the prophets of Baal on Carmel, the response remains noise rather than an answer. I will begin and remain with Genesis, then with the men whose biblical premises undergirded the scientific explosion we still rely on.
OK, let me see if I can carve out the next four weeks to offer you a rebuttal to issues that have been addressed in innumerable ways across countless disciplines for nearly 160 years. Your referencing Genesis is definitely the fatal blow to Darwin. Back to the drawing board!
1
1
5
295
The first followers of Yeshua (Jesus) were Jews who never had a New Testament, and who believed in Yeshua based on the Torah and the Prophets. John 1:45: “We’ve found the One that Moses in the Torah, and also the prophets, wrote about—Yeshua of Natzeret, the son of Joseph!” Later, after He was crucified and risen from the dead, Yeshua taught them more specifically how the Torah and the Prophets, also called the Tanakh or Old Testament, bore witness to Him, and how it was the mission of these Jewish witnesses, which today we call "messianic Jews" to go to the Gentiles and teach them. Gentiles, or "goyim" in Hebrew is also translated "nations" in the Bible. So it was that from one nation, the Jews, came the salvation of all nations. This is why the nations which stand with Israel are standing with the cradle of salvation and are therefore blessed: Luke 24:45-48: 45 Then He opened their minds to understand the Scriptures, 46 and He said to them, “So it is written, that the Messiah is to suffer and to rise from the dead on the third day, 47 and that repentance for the removal of sins is to be proclaimed in His name to all nations, beginning from Jerusalem. 48 You are witnesses of these things.
21
23
3
91
2,793
Bernard retweeted
Your articles are BS Tom. You’re working with those who have a stated objective to destroy the US Constitution.
I’ve seen some of my colleagues say @SecWar Hegseth has been effective and they agree with the war, so they’ll vote not to impeach. That’s not the question though. The question is whether he committed impeachable acts, and the answer is yes, eight times: massie.house.gov/UploadedFil…
51
240
1
1,407
15,330
Massie is a degenerate.
Replying to @JonathanTurley
...That makes these two articles as messy and difficult as alleged "high crimes and misdemeanors." I will be looking for the underlying evidence on those two articles, however, I believe that the other six are flawed. On the two articles, we need to know more about the evidence, but I believe that they are novel and initially problematic.
1
3
13
448
Gad Saad, your argument is juvenile and sophomoric. Invoking Richard Dawkins and declaring that evolution has more evidence than gravity is not scientific methodology. It is an appeal to authority dressed up as intellectual superiority. You have not addressed the fundamental questions. What is the origin of existence itself? What accounts for the laws governing the universe? What is the ultimate source of human consciousness, intelligence, reason, and objective morality? Then explain the historical chronology. If humanity supposedly existed for hundreds of thousands of years, why are the recognizable institutions of civilization, including organized governments, written laws, cities, complex engineering, and administrative systems, concentrated within the last several thousand years? Do not merely recite a timeline. Explain the evidence, the methodology, and why the conclusions follow. Human beings appear in recorded civilization as intelligent, reasoning, morally accountable creatures capable of extraordinary ingenuity. The biblical account declares that God created humanity in His image, male and female, endowed with the capacities necessary to fulfill His purpose. Adaptation to environmental and climatic conditions does not, by itself, establish that humanity descended from a different ancestral species. Nor does identifying biological mechanisms explain why life, consciousness, rationality, or moral obligation exists in the first place. You cannot invoke natural laws and then pretend that those laws have explained their own existence. Nor can you establish that the universe is unguided merely by describing processes within it. Genesis declares that God created. Your theory of unguided origins has not disproved Him. If you want to debate science, present evidence and defend your reasoning. Stop confusing ridicule, authority, and philosophical naturalism with scientific proof.
Utter rubbish shite. Innumerable evolutionists have already refuted this nonsense including @RichardDawkins among many others. There is not a single scientific phenomenon that has received as much evidence across countless disciplines as is the case with evolution. There is more evidence for the veracity of evolution than there is for f**king gravity, and these types of clowns continue to spew their garbage.
33
7
2
55
22,614