Pinned Tweet
New pinned comment: my public football stuff folder, featuring retooled field diagrams, including a bunch of cropped ones for use with @ProQuickDrawPQD . Examples posted. The dimensions (NFHS) are pretty much perfect. Included is a visio file as well.
drive.google.com/drive/folde…
6
498
Neema Salimi retweeted
Sports parent rules I don't follow. Dad of four, not an expert. Kids quit at 13 on average and it's almost never about losing. Which one would you drop?
Neema Salimi retweeted
Most people do not realize just how easy the AP exams have gotten. They are not college level.
Why/how have they become so easy? What's going on?
This might shock you... A brutal new piece in Education Next just dropped, saying the decline in rigor of the AP in the last two decades is, in large part, because the content has been GUTTED. For example:
— AP Biology cut 40% of its material
— Required lines from the Aeneid in AP Latin halved
— Spanish Lit reading list cut from 56 works to 38
Then the questions themselves have become absurdly easier. Readability measures show English passages have fallen multiple grade levels, and some now include footnotes defining basic words...
A 2025 AP English prompt included footnote definitions for words like "optimism" and "pessimism."
At the same time, scoring was recalibrated so that more students pass: guessing penalties disappeared, rubrics grew more generous, readers were told to give students the benefit of the doubt, etc. — "no one at College Board had any incentive to maintain rigor."
College professors are now seeing students arrive with AP credit who lack basic content knowledge and writing ability. The College Board insists the exams have not become easier, but everybody familiar with them knows they've become an absolute joke.
Advanced Placement is no longer advanced. This is not college level.
It must be replaced.
Neema Salimi retweeted
It starts with students passing a prerequisite course without demonstrating sufficient mastery of the material.
Then, the instructor of the next course discovers that students are struggling to learn the course material due to missing foundational knowledge.
The only true remedy is to hold the students accountable for learning all the material in the course, including the prerequisite material that they are missing.
But this requires the instructor to put forth a ton of effort supporting students through remedial assignments/assessments and help sessions while simultaneously "holding the line" in a hardcore way.
And of course it requires a ton of effort from students because they have to put in the extra work to pay off their "learning debt," which is usually a rude awakening for them.
So what usually ends up happening instead is everyone turns a blind eye and pushes the problem further down the line.
The instructor just gives the usual lectures/assignments, curves (or otherwise inflates) the grades, students go along with it, and the problem is left for their next instructor to deal with (or not deal with).
Neema Salimi retweeted
Empirical evidence surrounding mathematics pedagogy concludes that explicit and direct instruction consistently outperforms constructivist, inquiry-based, and discovery-based approaches in fostering mathematical achievement.
Discovery-based learning yields a negative effect on student achievement (d = -0.30), while explicit and Direct Instruction consistently deliver large, reliable gains averaging 0.72 rising to 1.22 for struggling learners. Complex problem-solving does not bypass foundational procedural fluency; it depends on it. If we want authentic mathematical reasoning, we must teach the concepts and procedures explicitly from the start.
In practice, inquiry functions effectively only as a later-stage consolidation tool for advanced learners who have already mastered foundational skills through explicit instruction never as a primary vehicle for novices to learn them from scratch.
237d54fc-9a88-4753-8e4a-7bb9…
Neema Salimi retweeted
One of my friends tutored Calculus 1 students at WashU last year, and there's so many crazy stories of educational dysfunction.
Like one day, they were helping a student who was stuck on subtracting negative numbers.
Yeah, a calculus student stuck on subtracting negatives. They were doing a problem that asked them to calculate a derivative, and the student couldn't do -27 minus 14.
I mean, no wonder they had no idea what was going on in the class or how to choose what derivative rule to apply to each function or how to work with functions.
Like, for crying out loud, they don't know how to do arithmetic!
And just because you graduated doesn't mean you get to leave all that math you're supposed to learn behind cause everything builds on each other.
Algebra builds on arithmetic. Calculus builds on algebra.
You're never done with anything. It always comes back, and you gotta keep building on top of it.
If you wanna solve calculus problems, it's not just the new stuff in calculus that you need to know. It's also all the foundational material from algebra and arithmetic, trigonometry, everything that is gonna come back and get exercised.
And if you can't do it, you're gonna struggle until you refresh that knowledge. So when we're putting students into calculus who don't know middle school math, it's no surprise that they're completely underwater.
This is playing out everywhere. Further reading: justinmath.com/the-fall-of-o…
Neema Salimi retweeted
Many students are sold a lie that learning should feel pleasurable, and when that's not their experience, the cognitive dissonance eats them alive.
It's like someone signs up for strength & conditioning at a gym and the trainer tells them that they should feel pleasure doing pushups, sprints, deadlifts, etc. Or like a nutritionist saying "you should enjoy the taste of broccoli." Completely alienating.
What a good trainer will say is "Yes, it feels taxing, and that's okay, that's normal. Our goal here is not pleasure, it's satisfaction -- making progress, doing things you weren't able to do before, feeling good about what you've accomplished, transforming yourself in ways that are beneficial for your future. You're here to work, so let's do work."
People respect that, and there's a kind of comfort in knowing that we're all here to do serious work. Whether it's the gym or the classroom, that's what people need to hear.
Neema Salimi retweeted
My long-held opinion that "test anxiety" is fake: confirmed.
You're anxious because you don't know the material! The anxiety is called not having studied hard enough!
Neema Salimi retweeted
You can say this a million times and there will always be people who say "you just want memorization." Even if you're a mathematician, who has discovered new mathematics and guided students to genuinely discover new mathematics. You will still get labelled that way. At some point, you realize the argument is futile.
In some rather influential education circles, you're just not really supposed to say memorization and knowledge acquisition are important foundations for higher-order thinking. The point is to try to make you feel like you're against thinking and what kind of terrible person would be against thinking?
There is more to life than drilling, repetition, and rote memorization but these are the foundations of higher-level skill acquisition and do not deserve the current stigmatization they receive from ed schools and union leaders.
slowboring.com/p/math-needs-…
Neema Salimi retweeted
Yesterday I was helping my younger cousin with her fractions homework: turning mixed numbers into improper fractions and vice versa and then adding/subtracting them
Her addition, subtraction, and multiplication isn't automatic - she had to stop and think about each and every calculation which made us pause so much
I told her mom that she needs to be practicing her math facts until they are fluent because as she progresses into more complicated math, she is going to struggle immensely
I recommended factfreaks.com/ (@sharemath is the math wizard)
Remembering facts is fundamental to learning and its crazy we even have this problem!
Neema Salimi retweeted
I think "failing schools" discourse leads people to underrate exactly how bad the instructional practices are at the *typical* American school.
The *median* American student has shocking lapses in competency, this is just not a hard question.
slowboring.com/p/math-needs-…
Neema Salimi retweeted
Woah 🤯
Students struggling w/fractions is more widespread than I thought
2026 EdWeek survey: 90% of respondents cited fractions as the top foundational skill holding middle/high schoolers back in math
Replying to @LifeofTabor
I used to be an after school tutor. It was eye opening for me to see middle school students struggle w/fractions (not apparent right away, required figuring out why they were struggling w/ current concepts taught in class).
Now I’m hearing more people say they see students struggle w/fractions specifically.
Neema Salimi retweeted
🚨 Waterloo is often described as the MIT of Canada. On CBC, Waterloo math instructor Dan Wolczuk describes first-year students arriving with inflated grades, missing foundational math skills, and unprepared for university math. The problem has worsened over time.
He makes several important points:
- High school math classes have been weakened so students can get better grades.
- Less testing in high school and fewer standardized tests both hurt student learning and lead to grade inflation.
- Grade inflation doesn't help students in the long run. It's demoralizing to get 99% in high school and fail your first calculus test b/c prerequisite knowledge isn't secure.
- Some memorization is necessary in math. Math builds on itself and students need to be able to easily retrieve foundational knowledge.
- The testing effect matters. More testing helps students retain information long term.
- More low stakes testing also helps curb test anxiety.
Dan thinks we need a national standardized test in Canada. I wholeheardedly agree.
Link below (Excellent job by @KrissyHolmes CBC, Newfoundland & Labrador, Sept 9) @CBCNL 👇
This is why pervasive calculator use is so detrimental to mathematics education
The anti-memorization movement has left millions of students unable to think because every elementary operation consumes working memory.
For instance, solving equations feels smooth when basic arithmetic is automatic. It's like moving puzzle pieces around, and you just need to identify how they fit together.
But without automaticity on basic arithmetic, each puzzle piece is a heavy weight. You struggle to move them at all, much less figure out where they're supposed to go.
It’s the same all the way up the ladder of math: from arithmetic, to algebra, to calculus, to all sorts of university-level math and beyond.
1
261
Neema Salimi retweeted
In the late 1990s the SAT used 200+ points to differentiate the top 1% after recentering, and before 1995 it used 300 points.
All credit to: @StumblingOaf
Replying to @GayBearRes
....you don't think students, college-oriented high schools, and the tutoring industry would adjust?
Neema Salimi retweeted
Our lineman have started making PBJs with a Honeybun in the middle
This morning they made me one, which is a sign of respect and admiration in their culture.
It is ELECTRIC.
Neema Salimi retweeted
"I teach mathematics at UC Berkeley. Three days a week, I stand in front of lecture halls with 500 to 1,400 students. By the second week of the semester, I already know who is in trouble. Some students are five to eight years behind in mathematics. Office hours that should be spent discussing integrals instead become lessons on fractions and basic algebra you would expect students to learn in middle school." sfstandard.com/opinion/2026/…







































