This is genuinely impressive work, @mudgen. I recently learnt that ERC-2535 Diamonds have always been powerful, but let’s be honest, the mental overhead and complexity can make them hard to reason about, even for experienced devs They promise simplicity, yet understanding and explaining them often takes real effort. What you’re introducing here feels like a meaningful step forward: a cleaner, more intuitive way to think about diamond contracts that improves usability without sacrificing flexibility. The terminology in particular stands out. It’s concise, memorable, and far easier to reason about a big win in a space already overloaded with abstractions and jargon. Clear language goes a long way toward real adoption. The optional upgrade path for existing ERC-2535 implementations is also a smart move. It lowers the barrier for current projects while nudging the ecosystem toward a simpler, more coherent standard. If this gains traction, it could significantly improve how builders approach modular smart contract design on Ethereum.