25, Degen, Builder. 🇮🇳
Hell
Joined March 2021
- Tweets20.3K
- Following2.3K
- Followers5.7K
- Likes28.1K
CryptoDevil retweeted
There is a guy on telegram who i know for 3 years now, have zero info about him.
I send him usdc, he sends me my local currency.
Started with mutual trust, used to do 300-500$ before, now it's 5-10k, immediate credit in 10-15 mins.
Good people are a blessing to this world man.
CryptoDevil retweeted
Expanding on why I believe "ETH as store of value (SoV)" makes much more sense to focus on than "ETH as fee-burning token".
Three primary reasons:
1. ETH as fee-burning token never was as strong as it seemed
2. Optimizing for ETH as fee-burning token would demand Ethereum and ETH function in ways that are very hard to make compatible with decentralization and capture resistance.
3. Meanwhile, optimizing for ETH as SoV is aligned with Ethereum focusing on its unique strengths (decentralization and CROPS)
EIP-1559 (including its burn) is fine and good, we should keep them. But we should not feel sad if fee burn is < 10% of breakeven indefinitely; the value of ETH comes from elsewhere.
The core idea: the big thing that people appreciate about Ethereum is decentralization and CROPS. The main pragmatic benefit that these things translate into is stability. SoV is the category where that is not an unneeded extra we merely put effort into for ideological reasons, but rather a pragmatic strength from the perspective of people putting in their assets. And in the era of AI disruption, stability will be highly valued.
You know how is AI is making breakthroughs we human never could? I have a theory.
It’s because AI is inherently multidisciplinary, and human academics are trapped in the ultimate echo chamber.
Read the full breakdown below:
Let’s be honest: human knowledge is severely siloed. To become a world-class oncologist, you have to spend 30 years reading nothing but cancer papers. You don’t have time to read about organic chemistry, quantum physics, or ancient history.
We force our smartest people to look at the world through a straw. They know everything about their single blade of grass, but they are completely blind to the forest. AI doesn't have a major. It doesn't give a shit about university departments or academic tribalism.
A model can ingest 10 million papers across 50 unrelated fields in a single afternoon. It can take a weird mathematical structure used in a forgotten 1980s astrophysics paper, cross-reference it with a random 2014 marine biology study, and use it to solve a 2026 protein-folding crisis.
AI operates entirely in the blank spaces between human disciplines. It thrives in our collective blind spots. Historically, the biggest human leaps only happened when someone accidentally crossed fields (like mixing X-ray physics with biology to find the structure of DNA). But for humans, that cross-pollination is slow, rare, and relies on pure luck. AI makes this exact cross-pollination automatic and instantaneous.
It isn't "creative" like a human artist, but it is infinitely combinatorial. It treats the sum of human knowledge as one giant jigsaw puzzle. It tries the insane combinations a human expert would never attempt because "that's not how it's done in our field."
1
131
Tired of all the hidden ads on the timeline bruh. Best new way 😍 and it’s just a hidden refferal link or ad post.
Please tell me about accounts that don’t bullshit and cut straight to facts.
2
76
gpt-6 is out here doing literal open-brain surgery on smaller models and i still can't even figure out which way a usb drive goes in
We asked GPT-6 Astra to edit Qwen3.5-0.8B weights to improve math.
It directly changed only 0.016% of weights, fixing 0.8B's reasoning loops & improving math up to 6x and even instruction following 3x, without gradients or training.
We call this Weight-Space Programming: frontier LLMs can now natively read/write neural network weights! 🧵
Blog: rikiyat.github.io/blog/weigh…
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
LLM was given weights explicitly as text in prompt and used code/forward passes (per authors' logs) to ablate Qwen looping direction, a known thinking-mode issue per model card. Primarily fixed repetition in that mode, not general 'natively' improving weights/math.
rikiyat.github.io/blog/weight-sp…
github.com/RikiyaT/lm_und…
huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.5-0…
huggingface.co/RikiyaT/Qwen3.…
1
92
She asked for his love language and bro gave her 12 random words 💀
🚨 BREAKING: BINANCE ENGINEER HAD ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIP WITH NORTH KOREAN SPY BEFORE $6.3B HACK
New, unverified allegations claim that a Binance DevOps engineer was romantically involved with a North Korean operative and left their laptop unattended on the day of the attack.
The hack has previously been linked to a compromised engineer's laptop, while North Korean hackers have been implicated in the wider breach.
The romantic relationship and unattended-laptop claims are being attributed to ZachXBT online, but his original statement has not been independently verified.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Claims that a Binance DevOps engineer had a romantic relationship with a North Korean spy and left their laptop unattended are unverified false rumors falsely attributed to ZachXBT. No such details appear in his posts or official reports.
cryptotimes.io/2026/11/01/fac…
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Bina…
x.com/zachxbt/status…
2
91
The biggest crypto hack ever: $6.3B out of Binance, 4x the old record.
The first $2B+ left in ONE transaction. The fee: $0.94.
Binance says no key leaked. So who signed it 50 times?
How it worked:
- Since 2025, an Ethereum wallet can run a smart contract's code, but only if its own key signs off
- The attacker sent 50 pre-signed sign-offs, all from Binance 14's key. One matched, and the wallet started obeying the attacker
- One call named "sweep" moved 167,000 ETH, 1.6B USDT and 61 more tokens
- Binance's first finding: likely a hacked engineer's laptop that reached its internal systems
- ~$3B is frozen, but 195,000 ETH can't be frozen
- Binance says it will cover every loss. Investigators suspect North Korea's Lazarus group (not confirmed)
Ethereum didn't break. The signing worked as intended.
Sources:
Binance's statement + Chainalysis via Cointelegraph: cointelegraph.com/news/binan…
The $0.94 sweep on-chain: etherscan.io/tx/0x53bd38b816…
1
2
87
CryptoDevil retweeted
The biggest crypto hack ever: $6.3B out of Binance, 4x the old record.
The first $2B+ left in ONE transaction. The fee: $0.94.
Binance says no key leaked. So who signed it 50 times?
How it worked:
- Since 2025, an Ethereum wallet can run a smart contract's code, but only if its own key signs off
- The attacker sent 50 pre-signed sign-offs, all from Binance 14's key. One matched, and the wallet started obeying the attacker
- One call named "sweep" moved 167,000 ETH, 1.6B USDT and 61 more tokens
- Binance's first finding: likely a hacked engineer's laptop that reached its internal systems
- ~$3B is frozen, but 195,000 ETH can't be frozen
- Binance says it will cover every loss. Investigators suspect North Korea's Lazarus group (not confirmed)
Ethereum didn't break. The signing worked as intended.
"Hey claude, launder $6B for me, make no mistakes"
Our investigators are observing never-seen-before laundering patterns with the stolen funds from the Binance exploit. Thousands of transactions in a short period suggest that the attackers are using automation to obscure the trail of funds. Rather than simply moving funds onward, they repeatedly circulate them among addresses, often sending funds back to addresses involved earlier in the sequence.
Read more: chainalysis.com/blog/binance…
2
111
The biggest Crypto hack explained for dummies
The biggest crypto hack ever: $6.3B out of Binance, 4x the old record.
The first $2B+ left in ONE transaction. The fee: $0.94.
Binance says no key leaked. So who signed it 50 times?
How it worked:
- Since 2025, an Ethereum wallet can run a smart contract's code, but only if its own key signs off
- The attacker sent 50 pre-signed sign-offs, all from Binance 14's key. One matched, and the wallet started obeying the attacker
- One call named "sweep" moved 167,000 ETH, 1.6B USDT and 61 more tokens
- Binance's first finding: likely a hacked engineer's laptop that reached its internal systems
- ~$3B is frozen, but 195,000 ETH can't be frozen
- Binance says it will cover every loss. Investigators suspect North Korea's Lazarus group (not confirmed)
Ethereum didn't break. The signing worked as intended.
1
170