Fresh

This tree prank is so hilarious 😂😂😂

While at it I also stumbled on Bayesian thinking, lol. Would you look at God 😂😂😂 Btw, this one was absolutely by accident I promise but given Bayesian thinking nothing is by accident I found out that priors + evidence = posterior knowledge = priors² Priors²+ evidence² = posterior knowledge² = priors³ And the loop goes on ad infinitum (at least for the rest of your life) What that silly math says is learning is compounding your brain never starts at zero What you learn today is your starting point tomorrow So you're never actually going to learn a thing from zero twice I'd like to explore this further to see where this takes me Someone who knows this is probably going to laugh when they see this for how juvenile I put it Don't blame me I'm going off my priors give me time to compound the learning I'd get better. ✌️

In my head, granting Agrippa's trillema Of justifications for systems foundationaly would into either run into: -Infinite regress. -A circle. - Become Dogma. That means that you grant every system at least at the foundational level. But tonight I discovered something many people may have discovered long before now. That, where logical justification ends at the foundational level is where metaphysical justification begins, so the conversation doesn't just end by granting logical justifications because they would end up in Agrippa's trillema. You would just need to move it one level up Which is the metaphysical justification for the system. I hate that I'm just finding this out, because even in my conversations among peers I just grant foundational assumptions at the foundational level not the application level. but we could have had more profound conversations if only I found out earlier we could move the conversation up instead of a deadlock. better late than never tho, so I'm more optimistic with this new discovery and it would bring more interesting conversations even possibly revisiting some of my old conversations just for fun and giggles Anyways just tweeting into the ether once more.

At best democrats winning the senate and the house would most likely just create a gridlock. They block his proposed bills he vetos theirs Unless they get supermajority votes against his vetos. So trump and the democrats may have to compromise on things. But I'm super interested to see how things unravel for real.

You'd just know that seyi makinde is a engineer even his manifesto was built on pillars and you can see the structure coming to form as you read his manifesto.