Daniel Ivan franco (@DanielPDT) profile picture
Joined January 2011
Photo by Daniel Ivan franco (@DanielPDT)Photo by Daniel Ivan franco (@DanielPDT)Photo by Daniel Ivan franco (@DanielPDT)Photo by Daniel Ivan franco (@DanielPDT)Photo by Daniel Ivan franco (@DanielPDT)Photo by Daniel Ivan franco (@DanielPDT)Photo by Daniel Ivan franco (@DanielPDT)Photo by Daniel Ivan franco (@DanielPDT)Photo by Daniel Ivan franco (@DanielPDT)Photo by Daniel Ivan franco (@DanielPDT)
Daniel Ivan franco retweeted
Tutti questi fenomeni su X che dipingono la Cina come una dittatura che calpesta i diritti dei cittadini ... ci sono mai stati in Cina? Hanno la minima idea che la Cina è il paese dove circa un miliardo di persone è uscito dalla povertà negli ultimi trent'anni? Che la Cina è il paese dove i piani quinquennali del governo non sono promesse elettorali mai mantenute: sono documenti operativi in cui università e imprese private lavorano insieme su obiettivi decisi a tavolino non lasciati agli spregiudicati interessi di gruppi di potere economico. Provate a trovare qualcosa di simile in Occidente. Zero. Zilch. La Cina è il paese dove gli amministratori pubblici che non raggiungono i risultati, vengono mandati a casa con una valutazione che incide sulle future nomine e sulla carriera, non premiati con un posto nel CDA di qualche società. La Cina è il paese dove quando provi a fare il tycoon (Jack Ma Alibaba) con pratiche monopolistiche, lo Stato ti mette una multa da 2,8 miliardi di dollari e tre anni di supervisione. Perché in Cina, l'accumulo di ricchezza che diventa potere contro l'interesse pubblico viene fermato. Da noi Thiel compra elezioni. Soros ne finanzia altre. Destra e sinistra, stesso meccanismo: chi ha i soldi decide le regole. Cambia solo la bandiera. Fatevi un giro in Cina. Parlate con la gente. Chiedete se sono davvero così scontenti e se farebbero cambio con quello che succede oggi nel democratico occidente. Magari scoprite che la realtà è un po' più complicata degli slogan
620
686
54
5,685
278,903
Daniel Ivan franco retweeted
并非单纯是政客将社会分裂,而是政客与极端民意共振,两者共同推动了族群的分化、对立、撕裂。 不可否认,原始状态的人群就存在天然的立场差异,但他们的绝大多数原本都是温和的。中间派人数最多,其次是稍微偏左,以及稍微偏右。越趋于极端,人数越少。 但在民主政治中,政客会通过煽动对立,来形成自己的铁票仓,让本来立场温和的选民,滑向对立场相反群体的敌视,并在己方内部形成激烈共振,从而走向极端。 互相对立的政党和选民,会在长期的互相攻击中,矛盾螺旋升级,陷入恶性循环。再叠加当下自媒体算法对极端言论的推波助澜,社会撕裂愈演愈烈。 而在一党制的社会中,则可以通过政治宣传,让这些立场差异不大、对立情绪不强烈的人群团结起来。他们会渐渐形成相对统一的立场:我们虽有差异,但不是仇敌。 当然,我并不是在这里一味鼓吹一党制,朝鲜模式我是立场鲜明地反对的。朝鲜模式是另一种极端,即为了彻底消灭立场多元化,走向了暴政。 拿中国来说,中国对LGBT的态度是“不反对、不倡导”。因此你可以在中国看到,同性恋可以大明星,变性人可以是电视主持人,他们并没有受到压迫。但你不能宣扬极端的LGBT立场言论,因为这个群体并没有受到压迫,极端言论会造成“反感LGBT但态度温和的人群”的情绪反弹,让他们从温和反对,滑向激烈的敌视,从而造成对立和撕裂。 而在朝鲜,公开讨论LGBT议题的空间完全没有(中国只禁止极端言论,理性的LGBT讨论并不受限)。虽缺乏调查结论,但可以想象,在完全没有讨论自由的社会中,LGBT的处境必定不会很好。 我们再将目光转向民主政治的社会,在那里,LGBT议题吵翻天。支持LGBT的群体,支持到简直要求赋予他们特权的地步。而反对LGBT的群体,则反对到甚至出现枪杀他们的极端案件。很大的原因是,LGBT议题被政客利用来做敌我划分。本来并不严重的对立,被政客煽动成激烈的撕裂和仇视。 也就是说,必须承认人群天然存在多元立场,但如何引导人群的相处方式,则取决于政治模式(现在还多了“信息环境”这个社会变量)。极端的多元化压制(暴政)和完全失控的政治极化(民主),都不是理想的社会模型。
Replying to @jxzdmzw
J’ai l’impression que vous présentez les choses de la façon suivante : la société est divisée parce que les politiciens la divisent. Pourtant, la société connaît bien des divisions matérielles. Comment faire une politique qui profite à tous dans une telle société ?
5
8
1
65
4,018
Daniel Ivan franco retweeted
Replying to @Ma_WuKong
人们忘了那些大平台连别国总统的私密信息都能摸到吗?美国捏着全球最大的几家社交平台,等于把全世界人的信息流都攥在手里。我们翻墙出去一看,西方对华报道里批评声一直很高,新疆西藏尤其集中。美国为了打压中国、打压社会主义,在媒体和舆论上确实长期投入不小。要是中国自己不搞平台,这世界的舆论就更容易变成美国一家说了算,它想让全球怎么看就怎么看。 中国有自己的社交媒体,微博、小红书上很多人还是在表达想法。批评具体政策和地方问题的空间是有的,但涉及高层政治和敏感议题的红线比较明确。 言论不能完全不加控制地放开。历史上美国通过资金和情报手段影响别国舆论是有先例的,如果国内舆论完全敞开,美国等外部力量买通媒体、放大负面叙事的风险很可怕。 你忘记美国对智利做过什么吗?美国CIA认为阿连德政府会扩大共产主义在拉丁美洲的影响,于是资助智利反对派媒体,包括大型报纸。普通读者每天看到本国最有影响力的报纸报道政府正在摧毁经济、国家即将崩溃、新闻自由被破坏、社会主义政策在毁掉国家,自然会形成负面印象。但很多人不知道,部分报道背后的资金和安排来自外国情报机构。 1964年,美国CIA投入约300万美元影响智利总统选举。1970年至1973年,CIA又批准了约880万美元的秘密行动资金,资助反对阿连德的政治组织,支持反对派媒体和宣传活动,向部分商业组织提供资金。1970年曾试图推动军事政变阻止阿连德就任。1973年,智利军方发动政变推翻了阿连德政府。 阿连德政府真的太可惜了,他是真想对智利人民好,但触及美国利益就不被允许。人民是很容易被持续叙事煽动的,掌控金钱和财富的资本巨头也可以通过媒体影响人心。
5
1
19
2,576
Daniel Ivan franco retweeted
Si los occidentales empiezan a interactuar con el espacio digital chino... jaque mate para las democracias liberales. Creíais que el cortafuegos chino aislaba a los chinos, pero en realidad os protegía a vosotros.
Replying to @Espertma_
西方民主只不过是在一群演员中选出演技最好的演员。西方民主制度的两大漏洞:1.只在选演员的过程中民主,而不是在具体决策中民主,2.智者和傻逼的投票权平等,而且傻逼在人数上有绝对优势
15
70
2
587
20,949
Daniel Ivan franco retweeted
Replying to @Espertma_
西方民主只不过是在一群演员中选出演技最好的演员。西方民主制度的两大漏洞:1.只在选演员的过程中民主,而不是在具体决策中民主,2.智者和傻逼的投票权平等,而且傻逼在人数上有绝对优势
482
6,198
906
46,483
2,397,471
Recordatorio: nadie necesita multimillonarios y autos voladores. Todos necesitamos agua limpia, alimentos sanos y bosques vivos para sobrevivir.
745
23,717
194
107,631
694,762
Daniel Ivan franco retweeted
Por 43 casi incendian el país. Por 1600 dientes de leche de ≈ 80 (o más) menores de 12 años, parece que a los de Morena les comió la lengua el ratón.
145
4,566
46
23,617
165,841
Daniel Ivan franco retweeted
I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.
20,412
166,778
39,464
799,360
175,600,875
Daniel Ivan franco retweeted
“JEFE SÚBASE lo VAN a ROBAR!” CUIDADO: INVENTAN LLANTAS PONCHADAS para ROBAR Así se colocan estos tipos en Circuito Interior, límites de @AlcCuauhtemocMx y @AlcaldiaMHmx Inventan q la llanta etas ponchada para parar automovilistas. Si los ve, avise a @SSC_CDMX o @FiscaliaCDMX El caso #C4EnAlerta
144
3,766
35
16,154
889,254
Daniel Ivan franco retweeted
Entregar al "Jando" a Estados Unidos, sin interrogarle sobre la participación de las agencias extranjeras en la extracción del "Mayo" Zambada, será recordará como una de las peores pifias de la @FGRMexico.
🗣️🔴 “‘El Jando’ no representaba un peligro para la seguridad nacional (...) Había elementos para que nos contara la película que México exigió, y lo perdimos a propósito”: @oscarbalmen sobre el piloto que llevó a ‘El Mayo’ a EU 📺 #MILENIO21h con @elisaalanis
11
134
3
470
18,809
Daniel Ivan franco retweeted
Let's talk about Mexican football, about their World Cup, about Gilberto Mora and this new generation of talented midfielders, and about why I believe this match against England can give real hope for the future of Mexican football. Mexico did a fantastic job at this World Cup. Four wins in a row against South Africa, South Korea, the Czech Republic and Ecuador, without conceding a single goal, before dominating England, one of the tournament favourites, for long periods and being brave enough to impose themselves. Of course, hosting the World Cup and playing at altitude are significant advantages. But you don't reach this stage of a World Cup because of those factors alone. I said it a few months ago: I felt Javier Aguirre and his coaching staff had found something. Mexico finally started to develop an identity. Before that, I struggled to understand what kind of team Mexico wanted to be. There wasn't a clear idea of how they wanted to play or what they wanted to represent on the pitch. Aguirre realised he had an exceptional group of technical midfielders and that he needed to build around them. More importantly, he understood that Mexico had enough quality in midfield to dominate possession and look any national team in the eye. That's why he moved towards a 3-4-3 with a square midfield, allowing him to accommodate players like Erik Lira, Álvaro Fidalgo, Obed Vargas, Bryan Gutiérrez and Gilberto Mora. You can even add more names performing well in Liga MX, such as Marcel Ruiz, unfortunately injured, or Charly Rodríguez. Mexico found its identity in that 3-4-3. The left winger, usually Julián Quiñones, played inside and enjoyed an outstanding World Cup in that role. Gallardo pushed high from left fullback, while the right back generally stayed deeper. This created a solid 3+2 rest defence that allowed Mexico to remain protected whenever possession was lost. But the main reason I believe this system suited Mexico is because of the profiles they currently produce. Mexico lacks players who consistently threaten in behind or can punish opponents in transition with pace over long distances. One solution would have been to defend in a low 5-4-1 block and wait for transition opportunities. The problem is that if you don't have players capable of carrying those transitions, sooner or later your game plan collapses. It made a lot of sense for Mexico to be more dominant on the ball and, especially, to press opponents high from goal kicks and other restarts, something they had been doing well for a long time and that led to goals, such as the opener against South Africa. Interestingly, Aguirre was actually more conservative during the group stage than he was against Ecuador and England. Against South Korea and the Czech Republic, Mexico often defended in a reactive 5-4-1. But against Ecuador and England, they pressed aggressively in a 4-4-2, enjoyed much more possession and controlled large parts of both matches. There is one name that changed everything, Gilberto Mora. At just 17 years old, he demanded the ball in front of more than 80,000 people at the Azteca Stadium and gave his teammates the confidence to play with courage. He showed Mexico that if you surround him with intelligent, technical players who can combine with him, this team can compete with anyone. Suddenly, "Piojo" Alvarado started playing at a much higher level alongside Mora. Mexico began creating relationships, combining through quick one-twos, building wide triangles and, above all, generating dangerous crosses into the penalty area. Alvarado would drift inside onto his stronger foot before delivering inswinging crosses towards Quiñones and Raúl Jiménez. It became one of the defining images of Mexico's tournament. Alvarado cuts inside, everyone inside the Azteca rises to their feet, and Raúl Jiménez powers a header into the net. You could hang it in the Louvre. Yes, we can argue that Mexico struggled in the final minutes against England and that Aguirre made a mistake by introducing too many strikers and relying almost exclusively on crosses. But this is also the same Javier Aguirre who produced two incredibly brave game plans, trusted young players and selected the best performers rather than simply choosing those playing in Europe. In fact, Mexico fielded more Liga MX players than European-based players. I'm not sure whether this evolution towards a more courageous, possession-oriented style was entirely Aguirre's idea, whether it was driven by Gilberto Mora's emergence, by the players themselves, or by the Mexican public demanding a braver national team. Perhaps it was a combination of all those factors. Whatever the reason, Javier Aguirre will always do what he believes gives his team the best chance of competing. Now it's time for the Mexican Football Federation to think about the future. The players themselves are already giving you an identity. You simply need to embrace it. Everything should start with Gilberto Mora (17) and building a structure that allows him to flourish. Alongside him you have Obed Vargas (20), Bryan Gutiérrez (23), Marcel Ruiz (25) and Erik Lira (26). There aren't many areas of the pitch where Mexico is producing this much talent. You can even add more players who still need time but have potential: Elías Montiel (20), Iker Fimbres (21), Denzel García (22), Fidel Ambriz (23) and Jordan Carrillo (24). There are more than enough talented young midfielders to build an identity around. The next step is surrounding them with players who fit that style. If Mexico wants to become a dominant possession team, they need centre-backs capable of defending far from goal, pressing aggressively, covering large spaces and who can contribute in possession. They already have Johan Vásquez (27), an established European defender who is left-footed, a rare and valuable profile, and perfectly suited to defending high while contributing in build-up. Now Mexico needs to produce more centre-backs with similar characteristics. Diego Campillo (24) could become one of them, but the search shouldn't stop there. At full-back, the future is promising. Rodrigo Huescas (22) and Mateo Chávez (22) are already playing for FC Copenhagen and AZ Alkmaar at a young age. Both possess the energy and technical quality to overlap, underlap and defend aggressively in open spaces. Neither is particularly dominant aerially, which is another reason why Mexico should aim to defend further away from their own penalty area. In goal, "Tala" Rangel (26) has shown he can become the right goalkeeper if Mexico continues down a possession-oriented path. On wide attacking positions, Mexico still needs to produce more wingers capable of consistently winning 1v1 situations. Alvarado (27) and Huerta (25) offer solutions, and Alvarado showed throughout this World Cup that he has the quality to hurt opponents whenever he receives to feet. But Mexico also needs wide players who can attack depth, stretch defensive lines and create more space for the midfielders to operate between the lines. They need more pace. More players capable of threatening large spaces. Up front, Santiago Giménez (25) can be a good option. But he still needs to stay healthy more often and reach his best level. Then there's "Hormiga" González (23). He may not receive as much attention, but he has intelligent movement inside the box, consistently scores goals, attacks depth well and contributes aggressively in the press. When so many of your midfielders want the ball to feet and are more technical than athletic, having a striker who constantly stretches the opposition, attacks space and presses with intensity becomes incredibly valuable. Of course, players like Quiñones and Raúl Jiménez can continue contributing while Mexico gradually gives more responsibility to younger profiles and develops the next generation of strikers. Ultimately, this World Cup has allowed Mexico and its supporters to dream again, but there is still plenty of work to do. Mexico needs to invest more in coach education to produce better Mexican coaches, who will eventually develop better players in the academies. The federation should also make it easier for young Mexican players to move abroad earlier, even if transfer fees are lower. And finally, promotion and relegation must return. Young players develop fastest when they compete under pressure. Few matches are more demanding than fighting against relegation or battling for promotion. Those experiences shape players who can later perform on the biggest stages, like a World Cup. The encouraging part is that Mexico has started talking about football again. Apart from a few journalists unwilling to evolve, most people have praised the way this team competed. The catastrophism and negativity that have surrounded Mexican football for years are slowly disappearing. Mexico is a genuine football country, one of the greatest in the world in that respect. Few stadiums roar like the Azteca. Few cities live football like Mexico City. Everywhere you go, people are talking about their national team. Now it's time for Mexico and its federation to match that passion with a long-term vision. The potential is there. This team has planted the seed.
53
586
35
3,957
105,517
Daniel Ivan franco retweeted
Este es el partido. Es ahora.
207
350
9
12,121
302,102
Daniel Ivan franco retweeted
Mexico vs Inglaterra 1-1 min 89’ El putísimo Julián Quiñones contra la defensa inglesa:
51
862
32
21,019
554,914
Daniel Ivan franco retweeted
🫶🏼🇲🇽
108
6,730
159
67,735
797,111
Daniel Ivan franco retweeted
El único motivo para que Gilberto Mora regrese a Tijuana, es para que le hagan una fiesta privada con todas las putas del Hong Kong. Cuanto futbol tiene en las patas ese mocoso.
63
1,214
19
16,976
223,864
Daniel Ivan franco retweeted
La Marina confirma el asesinato de la periodista Roxana Guzmán, que fue sucuestrada en Veracruz. El horror que vivimos los periodistas en Veracruz
643
6,412
300
13,371
284,952
Daniel Ivan franco retweeted
En Veracruz no falló “un elemento”, falló el Estado con MORENA. 4 policías y un comandante fueron detenidos por participar en el secuestro de la periodista Roxana, hoy confirmada como asesinada. No es percepción, no es una "ataque político" es realidad.
202
6,299
67
16,926
461,472
Daniel Ivan franco retweeted
Cuck Cuack !! 🦆🦆🦆🦆
408
14,841
263
86,028
1,129,223
Daniel Ivan franco retweeted
Los niveles de impunidad en México son tan altos que hoy supimos que una alcaldesa en el Edomex fingió su secuestro para sacar 40 millones del erario y "pagar" por su vida, cuando en realidad quería tapar sus desvíos de recursos. Y estaba segura que nadie se daría cuenta.
56
1,090
23
4,535
55,822
Daniel Ivan franco retweeted
Fantástica la afición de Monterrey abucheando las pausas de "monetización". Ojalá se sumen los tapatíos en el México vs Corea, y los juegos restantes en DF, Los Ángeles, etc...
169
994
13
12,112
169,203