UnHinged

Progress has always been made in the pursuit of pussy.

Stop treating men as success objects.

Women do not simply hold high standards. They hold standards that rise with their own value and with the alternatives available. That is hypergamy: a directional preference that continually recalibrates attraction upward. The result is that what feels like a reasonable standard to her is often an impossible one for most men.

You don’t need religion to recognize that some sexual behavior is simply irresponsible. The science is clear: a genetically unique human organism begins at conception. It is not the mother’s body. It has its own DNA.

That explains the epidemic of single mothers. Wait...

Being maternal and soft is something women do occasionally and only when their every need is met at all times.

What this woman is describing is actually female preselection: women are substantially more attracted to men already desired by other women. Men’s preferences are more intrinsic. A man wants what he finds desirable in itself. If other men also want it, that is usually because the thing itself is valuable, not because other men want it. Women’s preferences are socially mediated. They route their judgments through the opinions and desires of others. Women have a substantially harder time understanding the male experience because, on average, their psychology is far more oriented toward social consensus. They are markedly less willing to stand alone against the opinions of the group.

Stopping America from advancing AI just means that China is going to beat us in the AI race, which I guess is exactly what the communists who voted for Democrats wanted in the first place.

The only female deaths directly tied to lack of access to abortions are illegal abortions. Millions of female babies die because of abortion. No women die because of a lack of abortion.

When you vote blue, the stock market goes red.

“Incel” is largely a moralizing label that lets people avoid stating the fact that most of these men are simply physically unattractive.

I've only become more extreme in my political beliefs as time goes by.

I am reminded of an argument that women love to use: If men were the ones who became pregnant, they would immediately demand legal, government-funded abortion. The implication being that male interests would dictate the policy. Apply the identical logic. If women were suddenly placed in the position of the men currently failing in the mating market—low status, low optionality, facing consistent rejection—their revealed preferences would shift. They would not continue to insist that the hierarchy is illusory, that selectivity is costless, or that the unsuccessful simply need better attitudes. They would discover, with some rapidity, that competence thresholds exist, that optionality is unevenly distributed, and that moral condemnation of the unsuccessful does not alter the distribution. The hypothetical is useful precisely because it reveals that the present stance is not a universal principle. It is a position taken from the side that currently holds the greater leverage.

The classic reply and then block.

Men love women. Women love what men can provide.

The right advice with the wrong intent.

White liberal women have thrown away our country.

Time to open a Somali daycare center.