
Head of Blue Horizon Project @progresschamber Former Obama and Biden appointee, Deputy Assist Secretary of Defense for Space & Missile Defense Policy (Acting)
Joined April 2011
- Tweets1.9K
- Following1.1K
- Followers407
- Likes1.7K
After running ads hyping their cause, now Guardrails is talking about the spending they did to take down a Democrat in a purely factional battle.
There are a lot of groups who will use Democrats, but not as many focused on supporting them.
In their own tweet, Guardrails said that Gomez was already losing. Then they ran an ad to support their position in a race that Gonzales-Torres was already poised to win.
teapaw.org/GuardrailsNow/status/2…
Replying to @GuardrailsNow
Jimmy Gomez was one of the first House Democrats endorsed by Leading the Future. Our poll of the race shows him already trailing progressive challenger @Angela4CA, and when voters learned he's endorsed by an AI super PAC funded by Trump donors, her lead expands dramatically
This looks like a pretty clearcut example of Mandate Piggybacking to promote an anti-tech agenda that was not decisive in the race.
pub.bluehorizonproject.org/p…
Dave Vorland retweeted
Shockingly reasonable position, good on @GinaHinojosaTX
The governor-elect of Texas, Gina Hinojosa, has explicitly said that all currently permitted datacenters in Texas will be allowed to finish construction. This essentially covers all of the 2027 and likely well into 2028.
She is going to pass laws that ensure that all *newly* permitted datacenters going forward for delivery in 2028/2029 will pay taxes, commit to no increase in power prices for consumers, don’t impact water availability for people, be constructed with union labor and give “Texans a seat at the table.”
Sounds reasonable. She doesn’t want to lose a lot of good blue collar jobs and property taxes for small towns in rural Texas.
Datacenter commentary starts at 6:30 in this interview.
Also attaching her official campaign position from her website in the next post.
Sidenote: After watching a bunch of her speeches and interviews, I do think she is a political talent and probably has a future in national politics.
youtu.be/D-T6H3b8ZeE?is=mEWu…
The names in blue here are your Dem overperformers and the new frontline. Listen to them, help them, and keep them in office.
Dave Vorland retweeted
Protect consumers from real harms without getting in the way of the benefits tech can bring.
That’s the agenda. Read the full memo from Koustubh “K.J.” Bagchi 👇
progresschamber.org/resource…
If you are a House Democrat looking to implement a tech agenda, here is a good place to start.
First in @thehill: Chamber of Progress unveils its to-do list on tech for Dems. @ProgressChamber @adamkovac
The memo points to numerous state bills around AI transparency, like NY's RAISE Act, and Illinois's S.B. 315
thehill.com/policy/technolog…
Well said.
It’s great to celebrate these wins, but we have to remember why we won. These historic results are a cry for help from millions of American families that are struggling. Families hurting from Trump’s war and tariffs that have raised costs, from the gutting of health care. We have to remember why we have this opportunity to lead and need to focus on what we can do to tangibly help these families.
Well said, Father.
I have been holding my tongue about something that happened during the Ohio gubernatorial race. I refused to speak while the election was underway because I did not want my words mistaken for an attempt to influence anyone’s vote.
But now that the election is over, I have something to say.
For nearly twenty years, my ministry has taken me among the homeless, the abused, the exploited, and the forgotten. I have sat with victims of sexual violence and witnessed the lifelong wounds of childhood trauma.
What Vivek Ramaswamy’s campaign did to Amy Acton was among the most morally repulsive things I have witnessed in American politics.
They took a woman whose stepfather was indicted for raping her when she was twelve years old and featured her mother, from whom she had been estranged for nearly fifty years, in a political advertisement attacking her credibility.
The advertisement challenged Acton’s account of her childhood without mentioning the sexual abuse allegations or the circumstances of that estrangement. When people expressed their horror, the campaign defended it.
Imagine examining another person’s childhood suffering and fractured family relationships, then deciding those wounds might help win an election.
Anyone who has worked with survivors of childhood sexual abuse understands the painful realities of denial, betrayal, shame, and estrangement. A child growing into a successful adult does not erase what happened. Nor does a parent’s denial make that suffering disappear.
I find it equally disturbing that an elderly mother, whom Acton herself described as unwell, was brought into this spectacle. Whatever her own struggles or responsibility for the past, exploiting that fractured relationship was grotesque.
To everyone who defended this, consider the message you sent to survivors. To the young woman whose family refuses to believe her. To the man who has carried the shame of childhood abuse for forty years. To the frightened child who has yet to tell anyone.
What did you teach them about the value of their suffering?
I am a priest. I believe in repentance, forgiveness, and redemption. But none of those things requires me to pretend that deliberate cruelty is anything less than a grave moral failure.
Your political allegiance does not absolve you of moral responsibility. You do not get to set aside your conscience during an election and retrieve it afterward.
If your loyalty requires you to defend the exploitation of a childhood sexual abuse survivor, your loyalty has become an idol. And if your conscience cannot recognize the wrong here, examine what political tribalism has done to it.
This is not about Republicans or Democrats. We have a choice as a people: continue excusing cruelty from our preferred political camp, or summon the courage to condemn it wherever it appears.
Amy Acton deserved better. Every survivor who watched this unfold deserved better.
And God help us if we have reached the point where winning an election matters more than protecting the dignity of a wounded human being.
I dunno, 2024 Nick, some of these sound a little out there.
1. Convince Roy Cooper to run in NC
2. Finally unseat Susan Collins in Maine
3. Hope Sherrod Brown can pull off a comeback in Ohio
4. Somehow win Texas? Get Peltola to run in Alaska? 🤷♂️
teapaw.org/nick_field90/status/18…
Dave Vorland retweeted
"This election was not about AI, it wasn't about data centers," says Piper Sandler Head of Policy Research Andy Laperriere following the Democratic sweep. "What we saw last night was all about Donald Trump." cnb.cx/4eJqTEA
This is why it is so important to have a good sense of what this election was "really" about. Voters were clear that the top issues were cost of living and Trump's corruption.
If Democrats don't come out of the gate addressing those two issues, we will have missed the mark.
Dave Vorland retweeted
New analysis ⬇️:
House Dem frontliners who highlighted data centers in their advertising (20%+ of ad spend) did 6.4 worse than frontliners who did not
More evidence that Democrats need to have a good plan for data centers, but the first bills out of the gate need to address Trump's corruption and the cost of living.
National exit (sample: 79,668) -- Importance of issues to your vote:
GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION
Crucial/Major - 90%
Minor/No factor - 10%
COST OF LIVING
Crucial/Major - 89%
Minor/No factor - 11%
IRAN WAR
Crucial/Major - 74%
Minor/No factor - 26%
IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT
Crucial/Major - 73%
Minor/No factor - 27%
AI & DATA CENTERS
Crucial/Major - 56%
Minor/No factor - 44%
Thanks @sliccardo!
I am especially excited to see @BohannanIowa's victory. IA-01 is my hometown district.
Bohannan was trained as an engineer and can be a leader for Democrats as we establish and implement an innovation agenda for the country.
Pro-Innovation House Democrats -- candidates endorsed by @sliccardo's Innovation for Good PAC -- have won 39 out of 40 races called so far.
The new Congress is going to have a strong bench of pro-innovation Dems.
samliccardo.com/candidates
Dave Vorland retweeted
Data center bans were not Dems’ ticket to winning Gov races.
- Dems won every competitive race called so far, regardless of stance. Ford, Sand, and Hobbs weren’t pro-ban
- What Dem flips had in common: ratepayer protections (5 of 5), energy/water limits (5 of 5), ending tax breaks (4 of 5)
- Both nominees backed a ban in 5 states (MI, NH, OH, OR, TX). Dems won 4 of 5, so the ban didn’t decide those races
- Banning didn’t work for Rs either: GOP noms who backed a ban went 1 for 7.

























