
🇺🇸 Senior Fellow @FDD. J.D. in Int'l Law/Laws of Armed Conflict. Focused on the nexus of Israel, Hezbollah, and Lebanon. יהודי מהעדה הלבנונית.
Washington, D.C.
Joined November 2023
- Tweets10.8K
- Following2.8K
- Followers8.9K
- Likes10.2K
Pinned Tweet
"I have no data yet. It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts." - Sherlock Holmes, A Scandal in Bohemia
"One of the students, speaking anonymously, expressed frustration over the situation. He feared arrest at the airport over his draft status if he tried to travel abroad, and questioned why young yeshiva students were being targeted for draft evasion rather than the rabbis whose directives they were following."
Um, simple -- because you are adults with agency and free will, and the choice to submit blindly to these rabbis -- fallible human beings who are mere flesh and blood -- is a freely made personal choice. Pagans.
jpost.com/israel-news/articl…
I remember when this Palestine Firster positioned himself -- and was wrongly perceived -- as a sensible moderate.
David Daoud retweeted
Hezbollah readies for possible new regional war with funds from Iran, sources say reuters.com/world/middle-eas…
.@walidjoumblatt "says the only way to disarm Hezbollah is through dialogue and possibly a compromise, with the support of Iran and Israel."
Yeah, ok chief. Why do we entertain this?
‼️Lebanese Druze leader Walid Jumblatt, in an interview with Hadley Gamble:
• “The Americans are withdrawing from the region, and the Israelis are filling the vacuum.”
• “We made a mistake by choosing Marco Rubio’s track instead of the Islamabad track. Rubio’s approach will lead us nowhere.”
• “I do not believe Lebanese-Israeli negotiations, in their current format, will produce results as long as Israel continues to occupy southern Lebanon.”
• “The government tried, but believing that the Americans can pressure Israel to withdraw is a complete illusion.”
• “Israel is seeking to erase the memories of southern Lebanon, as though preparing to establish settlements in parts of it.”
• Calls for internal dialogue based on the principle that only the Lebanese state has the right to possess weapons.
• Says the only way to disarm Hezbollah is through dialogue and possibly a compromise, with the support of Iran and Israel.
• Suggests that the British-Irish experience could serve as a model for Hezbollah’s disarmament, noting that even Margaret Thatcher accepted a compromise with the IRA.
• “I cannot accept a hardline approach toward Hezbollah if it leads to civil war.”
• “We cannot eliminate the Shia community or tell them to leave. They are part of Lebanon.”
• Rejects the establishment of cantons, stressing that Christians and Muslims must continue living together.
• Says Israel’s policy is aimed at erasing Palestinian national identity, from Gaza to the West Bank, while pursuing territorial expansion in Syria and Lebanon.
• “Regardless of who wins the Israeli elections, nothing will change.”
• Says Israeli policy is rooted in the Old Testament and biblical narratives.
• Calls on the United States to send better diplomats and adopt better policies toward the region.
• “Syria’s Druze are taking the wrong path by choosing to become a tool in Israel’s hands.”
• “If we, as Druze, do not embrace broader movements of national solidarity and Arab nationalism, we are heading toward collective suicide.”
• Says the Druze in Israel do not determine their own fate, arguing that the Israeli government makes decisions affecting Druze communities in both Israel and Syria.
• Calls for engagement with Iran, arguing that Hezbollah’s actual policies have been determined in Tehran since Nasrallah’s assassination and that dialogue could help reduce escalation.
• “The region’s crises will not end as long as Netanyahu, the Israeli government, or Israeli society believe they can do whatever they want through force.”
David Daoud retweeted
That the Communist hammer and sickle isn’t commonly regarded as evil and offensive as the Nazi swastika is a failure of education.
“Dear Italian students, who today take to the streets carrying flags with the hammer and sickle and wearing T-shirts emblazoned with ‘CCCP’,” began an open letter in Italian by Lithuanian expat Neringa Budryt.
“I would like to ask you a question: do you truly know what the symbols you carry represent? And do you know what would have happened to many of you had you openly demonstrated in countries living under the oppression of communist regimes?
Let me tell you something. It is easy to display a red flag when, for you, communism is merely an abstract idea of equality, social justice, and rebellion against the system. It is easy to wear a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it when you have never experienced the reality of a communist regime.
We come from that part of Europe where communism was not a T-shirt, a symbol of rebellion, or a romanticized notion of equality. It was the system in which we lived—a system we never chose.
We know the history of Soviet repression, Stalinist purges, the Gulags, and mass deportations. Above all, we know the word "Siberia"—a place to which thousands of innocent people were forcibly deported, simply for thinking differently.
In Siberia—amidst freezing cold, starvation, and forced labor—many lost their lives; those who survived carried the scars of that experience forever. Entire families were torn apart, and generations were denied the chance to live freely in their own homeland.
In the countries of the Soviet bloc, censorship, political police, surveillance, and the suppression of dissent drastically curtailed individual freedoms.
We grew up in a system where state control permeated even our daily lives. At school, we were required to wear the red necktie of the "Pioneers." We were monitored; they tracked where we went and even whether we attended church. Even faith—a choice that should belong to an individual’s own conscience—could become a cause for suspicion.
We used to celebrate Christmas with our windows blacked out, to ensure no one would see us and report us. Because it was forbidden—just like so many other things: jeans, rock music, and all the symbols of a Western lifestyle. My mother returned from a Soviet labor camp. And do you know what happened to her? She was barred from continuing her education because she had been labeled an enemy of communism.
Under a communist regime, you could not protest. You risked arrest, imprisonment, interrogation, persecution—and, in certain historical contexts, even death. In the Soviet Union and other communist regimes, political dissent could cost you your freedom and your life.
Demonstrations independent of the authorities were not a guaranteed right; they were often suppressed by force.
That is why it strikes me to see young Italians proudly displaying the hammer and sickle—symbols associated with regimes that persecuted and imprisoned millions of people.
Today, you are free to take to the streets, shout against the government, criticize institutions, and wave your flags precisely because you live in a democracy that grants you these freedoms. Under an authoritarian regime of that kind, protesting against those in power could have landed you in prison.
This is not about denying the existence of social injustices, inequalities, or the right to fight for a better world. You are free to take to the streets to demand a more just society—but you should not idealize a system that denied so many people the very things you are free to exercise today: the right to choose, to believe, to speak, and to dissent. Before wearing a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it, listen to those who experienced that world. Talk to the deportees and their descendants; read the accounts of those who endured the gulags and forced exile to Siberia. Learn what it meant to be stripped of your freedom, your home, your loved ones—and even any prospect of a normal life—simply because of your background or your beliefs.
Before waving the hammer and sickle, please, study history thoroughly.”
I couldn’t read all of Joelle Abi Rashed’s article, it’s behind a paywall.
But this blurb said it all to me:
“By taking up the cause of Lebanon’s murdered Jewish leaders, Israel threatens to detach them from their history and absorb them into its own.”
So that’s the point of this? Not actual concern, but denying Israel — which has taken up this specific cause since the 80s — “first dibs” on Jews murdered and neglected by Lebanon?
Also, did Ms. Abi Rashed even consider the sentiments of actual Lebanese Jews on this matter, especially on the absurd concept Israel “threatening” to “detach” us from Lebanon’s history? Whether we view Lebanon’s history as our own? Or is she coming to impose her own preferences, identity, and history upon us and make us own it as ours?
I’m fairly certain Lebanon made clear what side of the fence our history belongs to — you know, the place where Jews can walk around freely with a Star of David and openly identify as Jewish without having to calculate and worry. And as the kids say: no take-backs.
How perhaps I’m judging from a mere blurb. Perhaps the rest of the article takes a wonderful twist, in which case I’ll eat my words. But somehow I doubt it.
This is a must read by Joelle Abi Rashed in @nybooks about Lebanese Jews taken hostage during Lebanon's civil war 1975-1990 and killed in captivity. Israel never negotiated for them at the time but is demanding their bodies now.
‘Natives of the Country’ nybooks.com/online/2026/10/2…
Helpful @TimesofIsrael infographic breaking down Israel's elections and where each party stands -- one quibble though: it lists @naftalibennett's B'Yachad's position on "voluntary" emigration of Gazans as "unknown" -- except Bennett has said in several interviews he's against that.
The Times of Israel's electoral dashboard: polls, possible coalitions and the issues at stake timesofisrael.com/topic/2026… via @timesofisrael
The Times of Israel's electoral dashboard: polls, possible coalitions and the issues at stake timesofisrael.com/topic/2026… via @timesofisrael
David Daoud retweeted
Bank of Israel rejects Netanyahu’s suggestion to circumvent sanctions with cryptocurrency
More than 100 senior Israeli economic figures warned that sanctions would ‘utterly destroy’ Israel’s economic model
jewishinsider.com/2026/10/ne…
David Daoud retweeted
נתניהו לפני עשור: אני אחזק את מעמד ישראל בעולם, תהיה לנו מדינה חזקה עם יחסי חוץ מעולים.
נתניהו היום: נתבצר על הר קירח במדבר יהודה ונאגור מטבעות וירטואליים.
David Daoud retweeted
גורמים פוליטיים: נתניהו עשוי לתקוף באיראן כדי לדחוק את איזנקוט לממשלת אחדות | הידיעה של @BenCaspit - בתגובה הראשונה
As for the "barely functional pariah state" part -- maybe our Haredi betters should show us heathens how a model society and country are run. Oh, wait... that would entail doing something besides idolizing human beings. Or doing anything at all.
Emphatically not a defense of Smotrich, but the solution offered by this old crackpot -- yeah, sorry, "Yakovolf," I don't owe your self-appointed "gedoylim" even the least bit of respect -- was to live a humiliated and second-class existence and to be happy with that.
Maybe you're good with that. But your lack of self-respect shouldn't govern the rest of us.
A 96-year-old gadol baTorah who has spent his entire life dedicated to Hashem and the Torah says that Torah and pikuach nefesh come before juvenile nationalist fantasies, and this arrogant, bloodthirsty warmonger Smotrich, who is prepared to sacrifice thousands of Jewish lives on the altar of his militant Zionist idol, has the chutzpah to lecture Rav Landau about teshuvah.
Absolutely grotesque. 🤮
Sorry, Smotrich, but the Torah stands above your childish obsession with your barely functional pariah state, its delusions of grandeur, and its fantasies of power.
Maybe it's time this Idolatrous Zionist finally converts to Judaism?
Heidi Levine describes her ordeal to @jaketapper -- for those pretending she wasn't attacked by settlers, or that the phenomenon of violence by the so-called Hilltop Youth and similar groups is transient or minor acts of "a handful of wayward youth."
youtu.be/f55s7iP0Cu4?si=-ZZM…
Isn’t this the criticism that many on the right level against AIPAC? That it allegedly sets aside all issues that affect the daily lives of Americans, including critical national and moral ones, and endorses candidates based on one metric only: pro or anti Israel?
So…how is James different?
The only time I’ve seen turnout like this in Florida was a Trump rally.
I have many disagreements with @AngieNixon (immigration, abortion, Medicare for All), but her opposition to data centers, private equity buying homes, and taxpayer money to Israel is popular and sound.
Tefillin are important. So is math, English, civics. Otherwise, you’ve cheapened tefillin into a mere talisman.















