YalePhDBiochemistUCBerkeleyASCPrf.BioSci.Purdue Biodefense.Pandemic.Ethics.IndianaSenateD23Candidate.Ebola.ScienceDetective.https://xitter.cf/t.co/2yowANFTo8

Purdue University, Indiana
Joined August 2008
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
Angela,I enjoy your posts. However,at VECTOR (which I inspected on behalf of the US Defense Threat Reduction Agency Biological Weapons Proliferation Prevention Program) there was only virus(not bacterial) bioweapons research. I believe bacterial research was conducted at Obolensk
1
1
2
149
Protecting personal privacy has been at the core of my public service. I have an established record opposing artificial-intelligence-based mass surveillance and will continue to be a champion for that cause. Please watch the video for more information.
4
68
I spoke about the successful Stop the Water Steal movement that I founded that worked with a coalition of groups across the political spectrum to prevent the transfer of up to 100 Mil gallons/day of water from Wabash River-associated aquifers davidsandersindiana.com
3
79
I'm not sure why so many journals regard internal duplications and/or "enhancements" as acceptable.
5
397
Replying to @addictedtoigno1
You are not surprised, are you? Standard operating procedure.
1
64
Replying to @jstewartIndy
There was vicious and false negative advertising by both Republican candidates in the State Senate District 23 primary. 3 million dollars of dark money. You are correct that it will backfire.
21
Replying to @RobMKendall
Not only did Paula Copenhaver attempt to get votes discarded,but she also wanted to subpoena voters,so that they would have to testify about the contents of their secret ballots,thereby endangering election process privacy. The lawyer for Deery called that attempt “disgusting.”
49
Because of a proposed lawsuit we still don't know who won the Republican primary for Indiana State Senate District 23. But I know who lost.
1
4
128
Replying to @FOX59
Because of a proposed lawsuit we still don't know who won the Republican primary. But I know who lost.
39
Replying to @CBS4Indy
Because of a proposed lawsuit we still don't know who won the Republican primary. But I know who lost.
13
Replying to @RobMKendall
Because of a proposed lawsuit we still don't know who won the Republican primary. But I know who lost.
70
Replying to @RobMKendall
Copenhaver attempted to get votes discarded&also wanted to subpoena voters so they would have to testify about the contents of their secret ballots, thereby endangering election-process privacy. The lawyer for Deery called that attempt “disgusting.” wishtv.com/news/election/cop…
1
39
Copenhaver attempted to get votes discarded&wanted to subpoena voters so they would have to testify about the contents of their secret ballots,thereby endangering the privacy of our election process. The lawyer for Deery called that attempt “disgusting.”wishtv.com/news/election/cop…
6
139
Replying to @CBS4Indy
Both Republican candidates lost: Their integrity, because they have been bought by dark-money political action committees (PACs); Their credibility, because of the vicious and deception-filled advertising campaigns that they ran against each other aol.com/articles/opinion-ind…
16
Replying to @FOX59
Both Republican candidates lost: Their integrity, because they have been bought by dark-money political action committees (PACs); Their credibility, because of the vicious and deception-filled advertising campaigns that they ran against each other aol.com/articles/opinion-ind…
43