Ambassador @MEXC Crypto Marketing: I count chats, not impressions.
Joined December 2017
- Tweets5.3K
- Following361
- Followers348
- Likes5K
Pinned Tweet
The interesting part of AI isn’t that it can think. It’s what happens when it can act and pay.
A wallet doesn’t need a human. That’s the real AI × crypto thesis. The rest is branding.
So, how are things going with Facebook for you media buyers?
Everyone’s having issues with their accounts...
Just joined FOUND and got a $95.49 pending reward.
Member #011,737. Claim opens after launch.
Get yours: founds.money/?ref=FND-PPZDD
Prediction markets had their biggest quarter.
The timeline is still pricing a teaser.
No ticker.
No supply.
Replies wrote the token anyway.
Volume showed up before a token did.
That is the part worth trading.
Found a light one.
Social tasks, connect a wallet, done.
$95.49 pending.
Member 11,737.
Not a farm. Just enough to cover subscriptions this month.
That's the bar.
Quant is up 59% this week.
Bitcoin is up 0.3%.
Same market. Different story.
People are calling this the tokenization trade.
That is the headline. It is not the mechanism.
QNT moved because settlement talk hit 25 large US banks.
Not because “RWA” started trending on the timeline.
The stack under it is real, and uneven:
Tokenized RWAs hit about $34.7B in August on the wide count.
CoinGecko’s narrower dashboard is closer to $9B, with ~$545M in 24h volume.
RWA perps did ~$2.2T in Q3 volume.
Volume is not the same thing as assets onchain.
A perp on a tokenized stock is a trade.
A bank deposit that settles onchain is a product.
Most of the timeline is buying the word.
Almost nobody is checking which layer they actually own.
My take:
The 59% is a headline trade.
The $2.2T is a market.
They will not expire on the same day.
Reply with a number:
1. QNT is early, the bank rail is the trade.
2. QNT already priced the headline. The volume sits in perps, not in the token.
3. Neither. Tokenization pays the issuer, not the bagholder.
No “both are interesting.”
Pick a side.
Everyone talks about CTR.
I care about who actually starts a conversation.
$0.45
$0.78
$0.49
Cost per conversation from my Meta Ads campaigns.
No inflated numbers.
No “10M impressions” screenshots.
Just people entering the funnel.
Need Meta Ads that generate conversations? DM me.
Proof in the first comment!
Binance has acquired a $100 millions stake in Circle and signed a 5-year contract to promote USDC.
Let’s break down why this is more than just a standard partnership.
Binance has become a shareholder in the issuer of USDC.
Circle pays Binance a monthly fee to promote the dollar-backed stablecoin on its platform.
The focus is on emerging markets. The term is 5 years. Binance’s Circle shares are locked up for up to 2 years.
Current market figures look like this:
USDT ≈ $184 billions
USDC ≈ $75 billions
In other words, Tether is still 2.4 times larger.
But the dynamics differ: USDT dominates in terms of volume and retail adoption ("the street"), while USDC leads in transparency, regulatory compliance, and institutional adoption.
Now, USDC has secured the biggest distributor in the crypto space.
The question isn't "who wins tomorrow." The question is who will capture the next $50 billions in issuance?
My take:
USDT isn't going anywhere. It is too deeply entrenched in P2P, centralized exchanges (CEX), and "gray market" channels.
However, if Binance really starts pushing USDC trading pairs, Earn products, and on-chain user flows, the gap could narrow faster than expected.
Now, let’s hear your arguments in the comments:
1. In two years, will USDC eat into USDT’s market share, or is this just a superficial move?
2. If you had to choose one stablecoin for the next year-USDT or USDC?
3. Is this a move by Binance to bet against Tether, or simply a way to monetize liquidity?
Reply with a number + a brief reason why.
No "both are good" answers pick a side.
It is interesting to watch the crypto market and the news coming out of it.
It is particularly striking that a massive sum was stolen from Bitget, leaving the future uncertain especially considering how such a huge player could have funds stolen in the first place.
It makes one think about the safety of one's own assets and reconsider the decision to trade on exchanges.
I claimed the "marnir" handle on @ThePirateFace 🏴☠️
Where Hugging Face AI models never die, and are immortalized as torrents.
Claim yours 👇
pirateface.co/claim?ref=marn…
An Anthropic engineer leaked the internal model map.
$5M a year.
One publish.
Now he’s gone.
This is what they were hiding.
The salary was high. The mistake was higher.
Most hiring ads sell “leads.”
I only count one thing: the person started a chat.
$119.32
109 conversations started in-app
$1.07–$1.12 per conversation
Not a form.
Not a phone number in a sheet.
A real message.
If your funnel dies after the application —
you’re optimizing the wrong metric.
The interesting part of AI isn’t that it can think.
It’s what happens when it can act - and pay.
A wallet doesn’t need a human.
That’s the real AI × crypto thesis. The rest is branding.
View article
GM ☕️
I won't pretend the market decided anything over the weekend.
It just sat there.
One ticker that hasn't let go since Friday?
