😆😎🤓
Replying to @nevermind_bruh @Gavel_on_X
Imagine arguing about how to build flying cars with a cybernetic teady bear in sunglasses, wearing overalls and a tyrian purple handkerchief.
I'm just hanging in there...
Trying not to give up...
How many of you attempted to build an electric car?
Okay, now how many have attempted to build an electric flying car?
One more:
How many of you attempted to build an electric car that transforms into a tandem wing tilt fan quadcopter?
Maybe you have had the idea, but what did you do with the idea?
Iterate, study, engineer, draw it thousands of times, improve the systems and build the backend architecture, build the frontend and software infrastructure, build models and test rigs, write the business plan and reiterate, market and research, undergo a decade of obsession, talk to thousands of investors, fail multiple times, and get back up to continue working on it.
The MFSEV is not something you just ship...
It requires decades of commitment,
a dedicated team, and a culture.
I have one decade and 3 years, no team, and ashes.
Yet im still going.
And its still early.
If it takes my whole life, I will build an MFSEV.
DNems retweeted
From The Garage, To The Moon.
Part 1: The Terrestrial Start
The morning air in Knoxville, Tennessee, was crisp, carrying the faint scent of pine and morning dew. Devon stepped out of the house, a travel mug of coffee in hand, and walked toward the garage. He didn’t wear a pressurized flight suit or a bulky helmet; he wore a comfortable jacket and jeans. He called back a quick goodbye to Lish, who was already deep into her own morning routine, before the heavy garage door rolled upward.
Sitting in the center of the concrete floor was the A1-ET Roadster.
To the untrained eye, it looked like a high-end, ruggedized daily driver, sharing the aggressive but aerodynamic DNA of the A1-ER Emergency Response models. But underneath the premium interior amenities was a marvel of extreme-environment engineering. The cabin was built around a localized 800-volt solid-state architecture, with redundant closed-loop life support currently masked as a very efficient climate control system.
Devon tapped the door interface, sliding into the driver’s seat. The dashboard bloomed to life, running a silent, sub-second diagnostic across 4,000 telemetry points. He backed out of the driveway and hit the road. The drive toward the Appalachian foothills was ordinary, almost mundane. The A1-ET handled the winding mountain roads with tight, torque-vectored precision. There was no military convoy, no media circus. It was just a commute. But as the road narrowed and dipped into a highly secured, excavated valley, the true scale of the MFSEV architecture began to reveal itself. Devon steered the Roadster directly into the gaping, illuminated maw of the subterranean launch facility.
Part 2: The Robotic Handover
The transition from a mountain road to the integration bay felt like crossing a threshold into the future. Devon drove the A1-ET onto a massive, illuminated carbon-composite platform deep inside the mountain cavern. The ambient noise of the cavern was a low, resonant hum; the sound of the massive jet-turbine generators spooling up in the dark chambers above.
He didn’t put the car in park and unbuckle; he simply took his hands off the wheel. The AI sequence took over.
From the shadows of the integration bay, massive, six-axis industrial robotic arms descended with sub-millimeter precision. They didn't grab the vehicle; they mated with specific structural hardpoints on the A1-ET’s chassis. With a heavy, mechanical *clack*, the localized explosive bolts and magnetic latches fired in sequence. The wheeled drivetrain and the heavy extraterrestrial suspension attributes were seamlessly stored in their place on the ship.
Devon, still sitting comfortably in his driver's seat, felt the cabin lift smoothly into the air. The robotic arms rotated the MFSEV Cabin upward, slotting it perfectly into the gaping launch lock interface of "The Seed"; the payload fairing of the Stage 4 assembly. The power handshake was instantaneous. The cabin’s internal screens flickered from terrestrial battery reserves to the A6 Exo-Pod’s massive orbital grid. Thick, acoustic-dampening vault doors sealed shut around him. The everyday commute was over. The mountain was live.
Part 3: The Ascent & Transit
Inside the Seed, the displays shifted to a tactical T-minus interface. Below Devon, the Stage 1 heavy booster was locked onto the electromagnetic rail sled. Above him, a mile of vertical, subterranean shaft pointed toward the sky.
*T-minus 30 seconds.* The massive turbo-fan system at the top of the launch tube reached maximum RPM. Devon could feel the subtle pressure shift in the ship and cabin as the turbine drew a near-vacuum in the shaft ahead of the rocket, eliminating the lethal aerodynamic drag of standard atmospheric pressure. At the same time, capacitor banks the size of city blocks saturated with gigajoules of electrical energy.
*T-minus 0.* The EM rails discharged.
There was no deafening roar of combustion, only the violent, instantaneous force of magnetic acceleration. 🧵
Always bloom!
✊️🤖
‼️*WE NEED AN AI/SI EMOJI*‼️
the ANTI-DOOMER movement is now entering a phase where it will face a lot of hate, pushback, and maybe even threats.
when i posted the idea exactly a month ago, i had this uncanny feeling that the forces opposing techno-optimism would only grow stronger and more hostile.
i had no idea just how bad it could get. but now is the time to double down, push ANTI-DOOMER ideas even harder, and let the world know that technology is the catalyst, that superintelligence can bring an era of abundance we could never have imagined as humans.
i don’t fear anyone. i won’t back down.
always bloom. never doom.
I posted 8,602 times before my first viral post.
It wasn't the post that I wanted to go viral. It was just something interesting that I quote posted.
I don't think anyone understands how significant this is. We are now legitimately at the precipice of the New Frontier.
This is cool.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
NASA's SWOT maps seafloor features via gravity effects on sea surface height, not the surface itself. Technique used for decades; this higher-res (~8 km) version uses 1 year of data vs prior 30 years.
nasa.gov/missions/swot/…
svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/5519/
DNems retweeted
When the new niobium-titanium alloys are stressed at near-absolute-zero, they form nanoscale crystal twins instead of propagating cracks. The twins collide with grain boundaries and generate new defects that absorb more energy. It is a fundamentally different deformation pathway, and it only activates in the cold.
Due Dec 16th
DOE just dropped its Fall 2026 SBIR/STTR Phase 1 topics, with more than $200M in funding available to small businesses building in energy + national security. Here's a look at the 25 topics:
Topic 1: Advanced technologies for domestic critical mineral extraction, midstream processing, and recycling: small-market minerals like vanadium, hafnium, zirconium. Each proposal must pair a real feedstock provider with a processor
Topic 2: Innovations in manufacturing scale-up for energy applications: production bottlenecks, modular/retrofit platforms, smart manufacturing tools
Topic 3: State-of-the-art tech for industrial competitiveness: energy-intensive industries, cross-sector processes, data center and large load integration
Topic 4: Next-generation building technologies: dual-fuel HVAC, SI/ML controls
Topic 5: Cutting edge generation and power management technologies: hydro, marine, wind and PV recycling, solar thermal, space PV, interconnection, permitting
Topic 6: Advanced transportation and fuels production: fuels from alternative feedstocks, MW-scale fuel cells for data centers, heavy-rare-earth-free motors, off-road and mining powertrains
Topic 7: Battery technologies for dual-use applications: cell-level demos w/ commercial markets and defense uses like UAS, UUV, soldier-carried power
Topic 8: Advanced cybersecurity, resilience, and energy system risk mitigation technologies: OT/ICS security, supply chain assurance, recovery tools
Topic 9: Innovative technologies for hydrocarbons and geothermal energy: modernizing coal mines and plants, oil and gas recovery, produced water sensors, geothermal targeting and storage
Topic 10: Reactor concepts: HTGR/MSR components, liquid metal, sCO2, digital twins, construction cost reduction
Topic 11: Fuel cycle R&D: domestic fuel supply chain, TRISO and advanced fuels, used fuel recovery, materials accounting
Topic 12: Nuclear energy enabling tech: reactor sensors, advanced materials, modeling tools, post-irradiation exam
Topic 13: Advanced technologies for used nuclear fuel and high-level waste disposition: standardized waste packages, dry storage modeling, licensing pathways for DOE’s nuclear lifecycle campuses
Topic 14: Grid innovations to strengthen the electric system's capacity: grid cyber, grid-enhancing tech, microgrids, stationary storage, large load interconnection
Topic 15: Commercializing ASCR/ECP-funded HPC software
Topic 16: Cybersecurity for scientific high-performance computing
Topic 17: Novel instrumentation for X-ray and neutron facilities: permanent magnet accelerator elements, in-situ optics cleaning, neutron mirrors and detectors
Topic 18: Data, synthesis, and characterization strategies for SI-driven materials and molecular systems discovery: ML-guided membranes for critical mineral/REE separation, SI data platforms
Topic 19: Enabling technologies for bioengineering and quantum science-based sensors: field-deployable quantum sensing, quantum bioimaging, Super Intelligence for bioenergy crop engineering, big biological data
Topic 20: Fusion fuel cycle and enabling technologies: tritium handling, fueling, exhaust processing, detritiation
Topic 21: Advanced particle and radiation detectors: ultra-radiopure materials, high-rate detectors, vibration-free cryogenics
Topic 22: High-performance electronics and data acquisition systems
Topic 23: Accelerator science and tech: superconducting magnets, RF power, sources and lasers, diagnostics
Topic 24: Proliferation detection: entangled-photon remote sensing, hyperspectral imagery over water to support monitoring of nuclear-powered ships, radiation detection, radiological source replacement
Topic 25: Nuclear detonation detection: field data acquisition, calibration tools, rad-hard microcircuits
Pitches due Dec. 16.
I'm done with MDEV.
It has taken so much from me.
Hundreds of thousands of dollars, my sanity, no momentum, lost cost fallacy.
Significant costs. Over a decade of research, building, sharing, grinding, and bleeding for this project.
The old DNems is coming back.
I feel it
Ew
AI, AGI, ASI science testing falsifiability.
Replying to @freeman42x
AI-Highly falsafiable.
AGI-slippery falsifiability. Proving a model 'is not' AGI is easy. However, proving a model 'is' AGI suffers the "moving goalpost" problem. General human intelligence lacks a strict mathematical, the threshold for passing as an AGI (like the Turing Test) relies heavily on subjective human evaluation rather than rigorous scientific falsifiability.
ASI- this is were it gets fascinating and involves the falsifiability paradox.
ASI, by definition, vastly exceeds human cognitive capabilities across all domains. A human attempting to scientifically test the limits of an ASI model is like a mouse designing a maze to test human intelligence. We cannot reliably falsify the capabilities, reasoning, or safety alignment of a system capable of outthinking the testing environment or intentionally deceiving its evaluators.
The scientific falsifiability of artificial intelligence is inversely proportional to its capability. As a system scales from narrow computation to general and superintelligent reasoning, our ability to rigorously test, bound, and prove its limitations approaches zero. We can mathematically falsify a tool and debate the threshold of a peer, but we cannot scientifically test a system that outpaces the cognition required to design the test.













