We Share Info on $BTC, DEFI & AI - Stop holding and hoping 👇👇Follow Our Strategy and take profits with us! https://xitter.cf/t.co/f9qbBneHkV

Atlanta, Georgia
Joined January 2018
Crypto views may be down in general but not for us the Disco Fam is locked in! Now is the time to be engaged and accumulating!
84
234
2
214
81,992
Discover Crypto | AI Investing retweeted
I don’t really understand this … THe traders who make real money are all at hedge funds etc. My friends at citadel Brendan Howard .. millennium etc make 40-50mm a year consistently for years … Very common knowledge that the traders at the big hedge funds make 100mm+ Not a single one of them wants to be w celebrity … even John Paulson etc who made billions as traders only became famous cuz movies were made about them It seems the only “celebrity traders” are the one who made some money deploying rugs on pump fun and posted vlogs spending cash … A top 10 hype airdrop recipient who made $110mm on hype and another 20-30 consistent year after year on his account just bought a 40mm dollar house in palm beach near me. He has like 70 followers on twitter. lol I think this trader celebrity thing is only for people who aren’t real traders. It’s for young kids who don’t know what a real trader is and for them to scam their way to to wealth cuz they couldn’t as traders When I made real money I literally left nyc and moved to middle of nowhere in Midwest and Palm beach house for winter. No real trader who can make money from actual trading has ever wanted to be a celebrity or a content creator lol Nothing wrong with the guys who do.,, but let’s not confuse ?
the rise of traders as celebrities makes a lot of sense to me most people can't realistically become the next LeBron, but they can learn how to trade from someone who started out just like them that relatability, combined with the potential to make money, creates a different kind of connection between traders and their audiences i expect that to become a bigger part of the social trading
126
55
22
1,164
102,146
The bull market our forefathers prophesied is coming 🌙
8
3
1
21
16,042
Discover Crypto | AI Investing retweeted
Aave has generated at least $1M from 10 different revenue streams in 2026. You can't say that about any other DeFi protocol. As @Aave expands into tokenized equities, new collateral types, additional lending markets, and a broader consumer base, its revenue becomes less dependent on a single source. With Aavenomics 3.0, all value will accrue to the DAO and $AAVE holders. Data by @Token_Logic.
13
16
1
118
5,241
Discover Crypto | AI Investing retweeted
YOUTUBE JUST BANNED SIMPLY BITCOIN We bootstrapped this company off zero and we are a team of 15 that depends on YouTube for our livelihoods. We strictly follow the community guidelines and believe this to be a mistake. @YouTube @TeamYouTube
615
683
127
3,982
187,519
Discover Crypto | AI Investing retweeted
The Audit Of The Memecoin Casino Since late August we have recorded every trade on every pump fun and Stonk launch on Solana. Not a sample. All of it: 384 million swaps from 7.7 million wallets across more than a million pools, every bonding curve and every pool that follows it. That is over 56 GB of data and 820 million rows of market history, and it grows by 18 to 25 million trades, up to a million wallets and more than 60,000 new launches every day. We measured each coin minute by minute. We scored every entry by what the coin did next. We trained neural nets on the result, then went wallet by wallet looking for the people who actually win. The question was simple: can anyone see the big move coming before it happens? The short answer is no. The long answer is worse than no, because the data does not just fail to find an edge for you. It shows, in detail, who holds the edge, how they use it, and what they do with you. Start with a coin that has actually caught a bid: real volume, real buyers, the kind of thing that shows up on your screener. From any given moment, about one in ten of those doubles within the next 24 hours. The rest bleed, and the bleeding is not gentle. Now take a wallet's first buy into a live coin. Every first buy, 22.8 million of them over a two-week window. In 17% of those entries the coin doubles before it drops 40%. Trade that mechanically, double or stop, and you lose about 19% per attempt after costs. Call that the house hold. A slot machine keeps 5 to 10%. This keeps 19%, per pull, before any skill or selection is applied. The reason is the shape of the payoff. A 2× pays you 100%. The failures do not cost you 10%; they cost you 50%, 80%, 95%. To break even you have to be right far more often than the game allows. The cabal is real, and we can see it CT calls it the cabal. The data calls it a cluster: a set of wallets whose first buys land within a minute of each other, on the same brand-new coins, over and over. We do not find them by name or PFP. They fall out of the trade stream all on their own. They are there. Swarms of 450, 1,400 and 2,000 wallets that hit hundreds of launches a week, moving in within the first minute or two of a coin's life. Smaller, tighter groups of 7 to 50 wallets that pick their spots. Across daily refreshes the count has run from 9 groups to 33, with members rotating in and out as wallets burn and fresh ones take their place. They are not guessing. The coins the big swarms pile into double 28 to 46% of the time, three to four times the base rate. Their own entries, across every coin they touch, run 50 to 60% to a 2× before a 40% drop, against 17% for everyone else. That is what an edge looks like in this market. It belongs to a few hundred wallets, and it is applied to tens of thousands of launches with industrial regularity. Copying them loses too The obvious retort: find the cabal, copy the cabal. We did exactly that. A machine watches every launch every minute and flags the moment a known group piles in. Then we traded every flag the way a fast human could: in two minutes behind the group, double or stop out at −40%, out after a day. Following the big swarms lost 41% per coin across 93 coins. The median result was −95%. Not because they were wrong; their coins doubled 28% of the time. Two minutes behind them is simply already the top of the move. They bought at launch. You bought the candle they are selling into. Following only the groups with a positive track record still lost 11% per coin. Following one good wallet on its own lost 20% per trade in our back-tests. The single pocket that came out ahead, a handful of small, tight groups, made about 10% per coin over 16 coins. That is a few days of trades and nothing anyone should bet a bankroll on. The cabal's edge is not information you can borrow. It is position. By the time their trade is visible on-chain, the thing that made it profitable is gone. The best model we could build still loses We also tried the honest version: no cabal, just prediction. Dozens of signals per coin every minute, price, flow, liquidity, holder behaviour, bot share, fed into neural nets trained on our own history and tested on days they had never seen. It works, in the sense a quant would recognize. The top of its ranking doubles 26% of the time against a 10% base rate. Two and a half times better than chance. It also loses money every single day. 771 picks over eight days; every day negative; −11% per pick on the same double-or-stop rule; the median pick down 45%; 55% stopped out within 24 hours. The ranking is real and the P&L is still red. The losers are deeper than the winners are tall, and nothing observable at the five-minute mark separates the coin that keeps going from the one that reverses. That is the part worth meditating on: a model 2.5× better than chance odds is still a losing model. Why nobody sees it coming The reason is simple, and it should change how you look at every chart. A meme coin moves because a few people decide to move it: the operator holding the supply, the caller with an audience, the wallet group with the bankroll. That decision is made off-chain. The chain only shows you its execution, the swaps, the volume, the new holders, and by then the first leg is done. Everything a trader looks at, from a screener to a chart to a wallet tracker, is a photograph of a decision that has already been made. The data is enormous and almost all of it is the crowd reacting. The informative part, a few hundred wallets' intent, is visible only at the instant it executes, and the people executing it are the ones selling to you a few minutes later. Add 60,000 launches a day, and the future 100× at minute one is indistinguishable from the 59,999 that die. The casino does not need to hide the cards because it deals them faster than anyone can read and analyze them. Conclusion After spending thousands of dollars in API credits, VPS costs, Claude credits, etc the goal was simple: find alpha - if it exists - in order to be able to monetize it. Instead, all we were able to prove is what we all have suspected all along - the meme coin casino is almost entirely cabal driven. 🫡 From the depths — The White Whale 🐋
308
334
149
1,970
179,513
Bullish
JUST IN: Banking giant Citi says $AAVE represents one of the most important real-world use cases for tokenized finance.
15
14,650
Discover Crypto | AI Investing retweeted
New Week. Most communities sell signals. We focus on something far more valuable: perspective. Join our discord, you have free trial! Macro Desk Premium | Whop whop.com/macro-desk/macro-de…
2
3
4
2,261
Bitcoin is Crashing... Really? The Bitcoin chart is well above key cycle moving averages. In fact, any $BTC move down that finds support above $71K is still a normal Bull trend pullback reset Patience > emotional moves here Chart: @therationalroot
2
1
16
14,957
Discover Crypto | AI Investing retweeted
News: JPM Coin (JPMD), @jpmorgan's USD deposit token, is now live on @ethereum. JPMD extends from Base to Ethereum L1, giving institutional clients native onchain cash that sits alongside the assets, collateral and counterparties they transact with already. J.P. Morgan has now added a cash leg to the products it already live on Ethereum mainnet, with tokenized money market funds MONY and JLTXX both already on the network. Ethereum is the home of onchain finance.
53
152
60
870
99,209
Discover Crypto | AI Investing retweeted
AERO WILL BE THE UNIFIED LIQUIDITY LAYER FOR ALL OF ETHEREUM.
47
73
13
704
34,695
Discover Crypto | AI Investing retweeted
Aero is coming. Get ready for launch. Three resources have been published with the latest details to help everyone prepare👇
20
65
11
666
38,797
Discover Crypto | AI Investing retweeted
Listen, I can't guarantee anything. Because I accept that nothing in the market is guaranteed. But there are a few reasons why I remain unconcerned about Bitcoin during this correction. 1. I accepted that a correction/digestion was entirely possible, even as low as $72k, while still retaining bullish price structure above the 200-day MA cloud. 2. The actual price structure itself shows that this current range is valid potential structural support. Again, is it guaranteed that price will use this range as support? No. But I look at the data and the data tells me that Bitcoin has entered a new bull market. Therefore, I view a high probability that bullish setups in the context of a bull market should be effective. This structural range (former resistance with the potential to act as current support after a recent breakout) is enticing to me and represents a bullish setup. While I accept that a bullish setup isn't guaranteed to work in a bull market, I must also accept that this is the type of price structure that has produced bullish follow-through in similar bull market structures in the past. I also accept that this setup might fail, but price could fall further to the 200-day MA cloud and still represent bullish dynamic structure! In other words, this new bull market isn't conditional on this structural support zone holding! For nearly two months, since the initial breakout above the 200-day MA cloud, I've told investors to prepare for an eventual retest of the same 200-day MA cloud, which would provide another opportunity for investors (like myself) to allocate into potential dynamic support. That's still my plan, by the way, if/when we get there. I can't comfort you. I can't press buy/sell for you. I can only tell you what I'm seeing in the market, how I'm interpreting it, and what my plans are, based on data/structure. That's all I've ever done and what I'll continue to do. I'll also tell you (and remind you) to embrace nuance.
11
17
5
217
19,093
Fines are the cost of doing business for big banks
Dear Secretary Bessent @SecScottBessent, My name is Everett Stern. In 2010 I was a compliance officer at @HSBC. From a back office in New Castle, Delaware, I watched billions of dollars move to drug cartels, sanctioned regimes, and terrorist organizations. The enemies of the United States. I documented it, I escalated it, and when the bank would not act, I took it to the @FBI, the @CIA, and eventually the @SECGov. The result was a $1.92 billion settlement. At the time, it was one of the largest in American history. It was also about five weeks of the bank’s profit. Not one banker was charged. Not one went to prison. I paid a different price. I lost my career, my savings, and my place in the industry I had trained for. I was blacklisted. Every door in American finance closed at once. I slept on a camping cot in a 300 square foot apartment because I could not afford a bed, and I waited tables at @PFChangs to eat. I tell you this not for sympathy, but so you understand that I know exactly what it costs to do the right thing in American finance, and exactly how little the system does in return. I made that sacrifice because I believed it would change something. Yesterday, your department fined @BankofAmerica $1.2 billion for failing to report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, some of it tied by your own findings to Chinese laundering networks, narcotics, and the southwest border, alongside 475 apparent sanctions violations touching Russia, Iran, and global terrorism. The bank admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act. Fourteen years after HSBC. A bank with “America” in its name. And once again, not one individual charged. Secretary Bessent, I want to say plainly what I believe you already know. The fines are not working. A fine is paid by shareholders, absorbed by the balance sheet, and forgotten by the next earnings call. Bank of America reported earnings this morning. Nobody who set the alert thresholds, nobody who decided the 2024 cease and desist could wait, nobody who chose the backlog over the law will lose a single thing they value. Their lives are untouched. That is the entire reason the behavior repeats. This is money laundering. This is blood money. Money that reaches a cartel buys fentanyl that kills Americans. Money that reaches a terrorist organization buys the next attack. This country has fought a war on drugs and a war on terror for decades, at enormous cost in lives and treasure, and all the while we have allowed the financing to flow through institutions we charter and regulate. Cut off the money and we win. We have never seriously tried. There is also a question of equal justice that I cannot let go. Before I walked into the FBI building to report HSBC, I stopped in front of the Great Seal on the wall and read the words engraved beneath it: “Justice is the defense of our liberty.” I believed that. I still want to. But every day in this country, people go to prison for crimes that are nothing next to moving money for the people who want Americans dead. A suit, a title, and a corporate badge should not be a shield from the consequences that apply to everyone else. If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel’s money should be standing next to him. I also want to raise something that is rarely said in these conversations. Why has no one inside Bank of America come forward the way I did? The answer is that everyone in American banking knows what happened to me, and to the whistleblowers who came after. The last person who spoke up is the only policy anyone believes. That is a culture problem, and it starts with leadership, in the banks and in the agencies that regulate them. This is not a political issue. It has spanned administrations of both parties. It is a national security issue, and I am asking you to treat it as one. Three things would change the math overnight. Refer individuals for criminal prosecution. Not the analyst in the queue. The executives who set the thresholds and chose the risk. One banker in handcuffs would do more than every fine in Treasury’s history combined. End “too big to jail.” An institution cannot be too big to fail and too big to jail at the same time. If it is the first, it must be held to a higher standard, not a lower one. And if Bank of America will not act as America’s bank, review its charter. A national charter is a privilege granted on behalf of the American people. It should be conditioned on not moving money for the people trying to kill them. Secretary Bessent, you said yesterday that these actions send a clear message that even the biggest institutions are not above the law. With respect, the institution was never the problem. The people inside it are above the law, and they know it. Until that changes, I will keep writing letters like this one, and the next bank will keep paying the next fine. I gave up everything I had to stop this. I am asking you to use the power you have to finish it. Respectfully, Everett A. Stern HSBC Whistleblower Founder and Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit
5
14
21,179